Computer-Generated Quality of Life Assessment Program for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients (LUNL2) (LUNL2)

March 10, 2017 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Randomized Trial to Investigate the Impact of a Computer-Generated Quality of Life Assessment Program on Treatment Patterns for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients (LUNL2)

In the treatment of advanced cancer, maximizing quality of life (QoL) is a fundamental goal for oncologists and their patients. In order to achieve this goal, some form of systematic and reliable QoL assessment is needed in routine clinical practice to evaluate the impact of advanced cancer treatments on QoL. The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) is a validated site-specific QoL measure designed for use in patients with lung cancer undergoing treatment. Recently it has been developed into an electronic form that uses a hand-held pocket personal computer (pc) to enhance collection and presentation of QoL assessments into clinical trials and patient care. This study will evaluate the impact of this computer-generated QoL (LCSS-QL) assessment on treatment practices for advanced lung cancer patients using a randomized trial design. The investigators hypothesize that a Computer-Generated Quality of Life Assessment Program will positively impact treatment patterns for patients with lung cancer.

Specifically, the investigators hypothesize:

  1. Use of the LCSS-QL will increase and accelerate referral to and use of palliative care services;
  2. Use of the LCSS-QL will decrease the duration of palliative chemotherapy treatment with earlier identification of lack of benefit in some patients;
  3. Use of the LCSS-QL may decrease the use of imaging tests to assess objective tumor response as an indicator of treatment benefit.

Maximizing quality of life is one of the most important goals of palliative chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced lung cancer. If this simple practical tool can be demonstrated to improve palliative management of these patients, including optimizing duration of chemotherapy and use of palliative and supportive services based on patient QoL response, this will dramatically improve the quality of care provided to advanced lung cancer patients. This study will also provide a springboard for other ways to incorporate computer-generated QoL measurement in treatment decision-making in advanced cancer patients, including in other tumor types such as advanced breast and colorectal cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study Design The study will be conducted using an unblinded, randomized trial design. Patients starting systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC will be invited to complete the LCSS-QL upon starting first-line systemic chemotherapy and then prior to subsequent treatment visits (every 3 weeks). Patients will then be randomized at baseline to whether or not their physician will receive this information at the time of clinic visits for the duration of study participation. Randomization codes will be generated by computer program, with stratification by physician, platinum-based versus non-platinum based therapy and Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status 0 and 1 versus 2 and 3. All patients complete the LCSS-QL at baseline, at the beginning of each cycle of chemotherapy, and at follow up visits until disease progression (initiation of subsequent therapy)or discontinue clinic visits an expected average of 12 to 18 weeks.

Patient Population All NSCLC patients with advanced disease (Stage 3B or 4) starting systemic therapy at the Princess Margaret Hospital will be eligible to participate. Inclusion criteria include the physical ability to use the hand-held instrument (adequate vision, manual dexterity), provision of written informed consent, and written fluency in English, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese or Chinese. Patients will be excluded if they are unable to complete or understand the assessment process, or if they are receiving concurrent radical radiotherapy.

Physician Information Physicians will be trained in interpretation of the LCSS electronic output data, in order to facilitate interpretation of the different domains of patient well-being, for example pain scores. An endorsement sheet will be printed in addition to the LCSS data, highlighting major changes in quality of life. For example, deterioration in pain control will be highlighted with suggestions to increase or change pain medication, consider radiotherapy and other pain management options, including changing systemic therapy.

Outcomes

Endpoints include palliative care referral rates, duration of systemic therapy, use of supportive interventions and QoL during treatment.

Data on the number of chemotherapy cycles administered, referral to palliative care (including timing), institution of additional supportive treatments, and number of imaging tests ordered will be collected for all patients prospectively. Data on LCSS scores, subsequent therapy, and date of death will also be recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Princess Margaret Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of Primary Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Stage 3 or 4 Lung Cancer
  • To receive 1st line Chemotherapy
  • Platinum based chemotherapy or Non Platinum
  • Physical ability to use the hand held device(adequate vision, manual dexterity),
  • ECOG 1-2
  • Written fluency in English, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese or Chinese

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if they are unable to complete or understand the assessment process,
  • If they are receiving concurrent radical radiotherapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Physician to receive results
Arm 1 Physician to receive the results of the Lung QoL scale
Patient completes the Lung Cancer QoL scale on the Palm held computer device and the Physician receives the print out of the results.
Other: Physician Does Not Receive Results
Arm 2 Physician does not receive the results of the Lung QoL scale
Patient completes the Lung Cancer QoL scale on the Palm held computer device and the Physician does not receive the print out of the results.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Palliative care Referrals.
Time Frame: Approximately 12 - 18 weeks
To assess the impact of use of the LCSS-QL on palliative care referrals;
Approximately 12 - 18 weeks
Number of palliative first-line chemotherapy cycles administered.
Time Frame: Approximately 12 - 18 weeks
To assess the impact of use of the LCSS-QL on the number of palliative first-line chemotherapy cycles administered
Approximately 12 - 18 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use of supportive treatments.
Time Frame: 12 - 18 weeks
To assess the impact of use of the LCSS-QL on the use of supportive treatments including radiotherapy, home oxygen, transfusion or growth factor support, community care support;
12 - 18 weeks
Number of imaging tests ordered.
Time Frame: Approximately 12 - 18 weeks
To assess the impact of use of the LCSS-QL on the number of imaging tests ordered to evaluate patient response to therapy.
Approximately 12 - 18 weeks
Differences between study arm scores
Time Frame: Approximately 12 - 18 weeks
To compare LCSS-QL scores of patients between the two study arms
Approximately 12 - 18 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: NATASHA LEIGHL, MD MSC, UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK / PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 18, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Physician Receives QoL results

Subscribe