Topical Jelly and Intracameral Anesthesia Versus Subtenon Anesthesia, in Cataract Surgery

March 2, 2023 updated by: Tomás Ortíz Basso, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Topical Jelly and Intracameral Anesthesia Versus Subtenon Anesthesia, in Cataract Surgery: Preference and Surgical Conditions

The options for anesthesia in cataract surgery described are: general, regional or local. The local strategy, it may be by periocular blocking(subtenon, peribulbar or retrobulbar), subconjunctival or topical. The risks faced by subconjunctival, peribulbar or retrobulbar, have made subtenon and topical strategies the most used. Likewise, to improve the effectiveness of the topical strategy was added gel topical lidocaine and intracameral dose of lidocaine.

Subtenon and topical anesthesia are two safe strategies and there were performed multiple studies showing that both are effective in controlling pain, but showing a slight superiority of subtenon. This difference does not appear to be clinically significant. In turn, the addition of gel and intracameral anesthesia, improved pain control. However, lack evidence to compare patient preference when using topical gel and intracameral anesthesia versus sub-Tenon anesthesia.

Multiple advantages has the topical anesthesia. Besides being a safe strategy for the patient, offers a rapid visual recovery, no generates blepharoptosis or diplopia postoperatively, subconjunctival hemorrhage and chemosis.

Because of this the investigators plan to conduct a study comparing the efficacy of gel topical and intracameral anesthesia versus subtenon anesthesia in cataract surgery with scleral incision, assessing the patient's preference Hypothesis: Topical administration of lidocaine in gel and intracameral anesthesia is a better strategy that subtenon anesthesia in cataract surgery

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Caba, Argentina, C1181ACH
        • Hospitalitaliano de buenos aires
      • Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1181ACH
        • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • bilateral cataract

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refuse to participate, high surgical risk (ASA 4 or 5), allergy to lidocaine or other amide local anesthesics, inability to understand the informed consent, coagulation abnormalities, prior ophthalmologic surgery, small pupil, Fuchs dystrophy, lens luxation, uveitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Topical
We will made anesthesia with topical lidocaine and compared with subtenon anesthesia
Active Comparator: subtenon
We will made anesthesia with topical lidocaine and compared with subtenon anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of subjects who prefer topical anesthesia.
Time Frame: 1 month
The number of subjects who prefer topical anesthesia will measure at the end of the second surgery (1 month)
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intraoperative pain
Time Frame: 1 hour
Amount of pain as verbal analog scale. Be evaluated at the end of surgery
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract Surgery Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine

3
Subscribe