Clinical Trial of Zirconia and Metal Adhesive Bridges

A Single-centre Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial of Zirconia-based Versus Metal-based Adhesive Bridges for Replacing 2 Missing Teeth or Less in Adults.

Adhesive bridges are becoming popular in patients with congenitally missing teeth and these are type of bridges that can be done with only minimal or with no preparation to replace the missing tooth/teeth. The best clinical gain is the minimal tooth preparation or no need for the removal of tooth substance. Treatment for this type of bridges does not usually require anaesthesia. In addition, adhesive bridges can provide reasonable aesthetical outcome with minimal cost and reduced chair time.

The biggest issue is that high failure rate in the long term, and gray colour shining through the metal wing cemented onto the abutment tooth. This can compromise the aesthetical outcome. The aesthetical problem can be solved by the use of zirconia all ceramic material to construct the bridge.

Study Overview

• Status: Withdrawn
• Conditions: Missing Teeth
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: Zirconia-based adhesive bridge; Procedure: Metal-based adhesive bridge

• Study Type: Interventional
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United Kingdom
  • London, United Kingdom, E1 2AD
    • Barts and The London, School of Medicine and Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Male or female ≥ 18 years of age
• Has a maximum of 2 units requiring placement
• Is a regular dental attendee and agree to return for assessments
• Written subject informed consent (IC) for this protocol will be obtained prior to study enrolment. Each subject will be required to sign and date the IC form prior to their participation
• Sound or minimally restored abutment(s)

Exclusion Criteria:

• The presence of any periodontal pocket depths equal or above 4 mm with active periodontal disease
• Any history of adverse reaction to clinical materials to be used in this study
• They are pregnant or had serious medical condition that may interfere with the dental treatment
• Acquired tooth loss more than 2 units requiring replacement
• Participants who have parafunctional habits
• Severe Class II Div II cases

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: OTHER
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: PARALLEL
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Zirconia-based adhesive bridges; Patients in this group will be treated with the employment of zirconia-based adhesive bridges to replace the missing tooth/teeth.	Procedure: Zirconia-based adhesive bridge; Zirconia-based adhesive bridge will be used to replace the missing tooth/teeth.
EXPERIMENTAL: Metal-based adhesive bridges; Patients in this group will be treated with the employment of metal-based adhesive bridges.	Procedure: Metal-based adhesive bridge; The metal-based adhesive bridge will be used to replace the missing tooth/teeth.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Clinical survival of adhesive bridges	Evaluation of clinical survival: participants will be evaluated according to the modified USPHS criteria. The evaluation criteria will include: retention, framework fracture, veneering fracture, marginal adaptation, recurrent caries and colour match. The examination will be after one to two weeks, after 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years. The evaluation will also include the biological complication. Plaque, gingival index, periodontal probing depth and gingival recession will be evaluated around the abutments and compared to a control tooth	5 Years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Quality of life, aesthetic outcome.	The patients will be requested to fill the OHIP-14 and the VAS questionnaires after one week to two weeks, after 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months in order to assess the quality of their lives and their aesthetic outcome after having the bridge.	18 months
Marginal discrepancy evaluation.	Marginal discrepancy will be evaluated by means of Scannining Electron Microscope (SEM) after cementation.	After cementation
Economic evaluation	Economic evaluation will be run in parallel to the study and will include the overall cost of the two treatments.	5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Queen Mary University of London
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Aylin Baysan, BDS, MSc, PhD, Queen Mary University of London; Study Director: Amani Agha, BDS,MSc, Queen Mary University of London

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: April 1, 2012
• Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED): April 1, 2018
• Study Completion (ANTICIPATED): April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 27, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 2, 2011
• First Posted (ESTIMATE): May 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): September 26, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 23, 2022
• Last Verified: January 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Congenital Abnormalities; Stomatognathic Diseases; Periodontal Diseases; Mouth Diseases; Tooth Diseases; Stomatognathic System Abnormalities; Tooth Abnormalities; Tooth Loss; Anodontia
• Other Study ID Numbers: 100298307