Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

March 23, 2016 updated by: James McGough, University of California, Los Angeles

An Eight-Week, Open Trial Pilot Investigation of Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

This proposal seeks to obtain preliminary data on the potential efficacy, tolerability, and feasibility of trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) as a treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). If successful, this open-label, exploratory, pilot study will provide a basis for a federal grant application and larger controlled trials.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male and female youth age 9 to 14 years with Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel -IV (DSM-IV) ADHD, combined subtype as determined by Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (KSADS) and clinical interview
  • minimum scores of 12 on both the inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive subscales of the baseline ADHD-Rating Scale (ADHD-RS)S
  • Clinical Global Impression- Severity (CGI-S) score at baseline
  • no current medications with central nervous system (CNS) affects
  • parents able and willing to monitor proper use of the stimulation device and complete all required rating scales.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • impaired functioning to a degree that requires immediate initiation of ADHD medication in the opinion of the parents and/or investigator; 2) current diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder or major depression.
  • history of lifetime psychosis or mania
  • current suicidality
  • history of seizure disorder, tic disorder, or head injury with loss of consciousness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: trigeminal nerve stimulation
Open label treatment with trigeminal nerve stimulation in an 8-week trial.
A standard FDA approved transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit will be used to apply low intensity stimulation to the trigeminal nerves during sleep.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ADHD-IV Rating Scale (ADHD-RS)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8.

A standard, frequently used, clinician completed measure of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual -IV (DSM-IV) ADHD symptoms.

Scale ranges from 0 (best) to 54 (worst).

Unit of Measure - units on a scale.

Outcome value reflects change from baseline at endpoint (Week 8) in ADHD-RS.

Baseline and Week 8.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Week 8

A global measure of clinical improvement compared with baseline.

A standard clinical trials rating scale with value from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).

Unit of measure - percentage improved based on CGI-I scores of 1 and 2 versus all others.

Week 8
Conners Global Index - Parent
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8.

A standard, parent completed measure of ADHD symptoms.

Scale range from 0 (best) to 27 (worst).

Unit of Measure - units on a scale.

Outcome value reflects change from baseline at endpoint (Week 8).

Baseline and Week 8.
Attention Network Task - Incongruent Reaction Time
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8.

Laboratory measure of response inhibition. The measure assessed the reaction time in milliseconds (ms) using the Attention Network Task (ANT), which is a computerized test designed to evaluate the efficiency of an attention network.

Outcome measure represents a change from Baseline at Week 8 for the ANT - Incongruent reaction time. Lower reaction time is consider a better outcome.

Baseline and Week 8.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 6, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Clinical Trials on EMS 7500 Digital Muscle Stimulator

Subscribe