Navigation Brain Stimulation for Evaluation of the Neuroprotective Drug Efficiency in Patients After Ischemic Stroke. (3C)

December 22, 2011 updated by: Clinical Institute of the Brain, Russia

Navigation Brain Stimulation (NBS) for Evaluation of the Neuroprotective Drug Efficiency in Patients After Ischemic Stroke.

Ischemic stroke (IS) causes high mortality and severe disability. To improve outcome it's very important to choose the right way of the management of the patient and an appropriate drugs.

There is a large number of the so-called neuroprotective drugs, which were effective in laboratory, but didn't show positive results in clinical studies with using traditional clinical scales scores as a primary outcome measures.

Specialists suggest, that the investigators could receive better results if the investigators change design of the studies, particularly if the investigators select more precise and sensitive method of assessment.

Aim of this study: to determine the role of navigated brain stimulation (NBS) for evaluation of the changes in the motor centers and motor tracts after administration of different cerebroprotective drugs. (The substances won't be compared to each other).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sverdlovsk region
      • Ekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk region, Russian Federation, 620102
        • Clinical Institute of Brain

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients from 3 to 6 months after ischemic stroke
  • hemispheric infarction
  • paresis from 2 to 4 scores by Medical Research Council Weakness Scale (MRC)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of seizures
  • pregnancy, lactation
  • cognitive deficiency (poor compliance)
  • acute renal failure
  • acute hepatic failure
  • oncological history
  • cardiac pacemakers and other metal implants
  • regular intake of any nootropic drugs
  • Modified Ashford Scale scores 3 and more
  • regular intake of anticonvulsants, neuromuscular relaxants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: cerebrolysin
IV
Cerebrolysin IV 10 ml daily 10 days
Active Comparator: L-Alpha glycerylphosphorylcholine
IV
choline alfoscerate IV 1000mg daily 10 days
Active Comparator: citicoline
IV and per os
citicoline IV 2000 mg, then citicoline 900 mg/day (300mg*3 times per day) per os

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
MEP(motor evoked potential) parameter: motor threshold
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
MEP(motor evoked potential) parameter: latency
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
MEP(motor evoked potential) parameter: amplitude
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Adverse Events
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength scores
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
Barthel index
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
Change from Baseline in Alpha waves percentage
Time Frame: 2 months
EEG parameter
2 months
Change from Baseline in Beta waves percentage
Time Frame: 2 months
EEG parameters
2 months
Change from Baseline in Delta waves percentage
Time Frame: 2 months
EEG parameter
2 months
Change from Baseline in Theta waves percentage
Time Frame: 2 months
EEG parameter
2 months
Presence of the abnormal epileptiform activity
Time Frame: 2 months
EEG parameters
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2011

Last Verified

December 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on cerebrolysin

Subscribe