Femoral Versus Radial Access for Primary PCI (SAFARI-STEMI)

January 25, 2019 updated by: Michel Le May, Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

The Safety and Efficacy of Femoral Access Versus Radial for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (SAFARI-STEMI Trial)

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has become the dominant strategy for the treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), as studies have shown that PPCI is superior to fibrinolytic therapy. Recent evidence suggests that transradial access (TRA) is superior to transfemoral (TFA) for patients undergoing PPCI. Two large trials report a mortality benefit favouring TRA. The results of these two trials could significantly impact practice guidelines and lead to a recommendation that the approach of choice for primary PCI be radial rather than femoral. This would have significant implications for both PCI centers and interventionalists associated with a large impact on practice and education. Yet, many centers and interventionalists in Canada and in the USA prefer TFA and currently feel pressured in making the change to TRA. With that said, these trials did not include new pharmacotherapy and new technology that would likely have closed or eliminated the gap between TFA and TRA by improving the safety and efficacy of these two approaches. Furthermore, these trials were not powered to conclusively show a mortality benefit. The authors of the two large trials emphasized the need for further trials to confirm the benefits of TRA.

The SAFARI-STEMI trial aims to compare TFA with TRA in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI). The primary outcome will be defined as all cause mortality measured at 30 days. The trial will also evaluate: 1) bleeding events and 2) the composite of death, reinfarction, or stroke defined as major adverse clinical events (MACE). The trial will include the use of antithrombotic therapy with monotherapy, with either bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin; the use of glycoprotein inhibitors IIb/IIIa inhibitors will be avoided. The study will encourage liberal use of vascular closing devices. The trial will also compare delays to reperfusion between the two strategies. Finally, a cost analysis is proposed.

In view of recent publications, there is now a need for a large randomized trial using contemporary adjunct therapies to assess the safety and efficacy of the TRA vs. the TFA in PPCI. The proposed trial aims to conclusively show whether there is a survival benefit associated with the TRA approach.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2292

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R2H 2A6
        • St. Boniface Hospital
    • New Brunswick
      • Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada, E2L 4L2
        • Saint John Regional Hospital
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 4G4
        • Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center
    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4W7
        • University of Ottawa Heart Institute
      • Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, P7B 6V4
        • Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ischemic chest discomfort of greater or equal to 30 minutes duration,
  2. Onset of chest pain of greater or equal to 12 hrs prior to entry into the study,
  3. ST segment elevation of > 1 mm (0.1 mV) in two or more contiguous electrocardiographic leads (on a standard 12 lead ECG) or left bundle branch block not known to be old

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age < 18 yrs
  2. Active bleeding
  3. Inadequate vascular access from the femoral arteries (i.e. severe peripheral vascular artery disease precluding right or left femoral approach)
  4. Abnormal Allen's test precluding either right or left radial approach
  5. PCI within the last 30 days
  6. Fibrinolytic agents within the last 7 days
  7. Warfarin, dabigatran or other oral anticoagulant within the last 7 days
  8. Known coagulation disorder (i.e. INR >2.0, platelets <100,000 / mm3)
  9. Allergy to aspirin
  10. Participation in a study with another investigational device or drug < four weeks
  11. Known severe renal impairment (creatinine >200 umol/L)*
  12. Known severe contrast (dye) allergy
  13. Prior coronary artery bypass surgery
  14. Inability to provide informed consent

    • Bivalirudin is contraindicated in renal failure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: TRA
Transradial Access
Participants will be randomly assigned an access site, radial or femoral, for PPCI.
Other: TFA
Transfemoral Access
Participants will be randomly assigned an access site, radial or femoral, for PPCI.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
The primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality measured at 30 days.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Stent thrombosis
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
30 days and 6 months
Death, reinfarction, or stroke
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
30 days and 6 months
Reinfarction
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
30 days and 6 months
Stroke
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
30 days and 6 months
Bleeding
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Number of blood transfusions
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Cardiogenic shock
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Critical time intervals (including door-to-balloon time)
Time Frame: Index hospitalization
Index hospitalization
Fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure
Time Frame: Index Catheterization
Index Catheterization
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: Index hospitalization
Index hospitalization
Resource utilization
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI)

Subscribe