Clinical Trial of a Rehabilitation Game - SuperBetter (SuperBetter)

Clinical Trial of a Novel Rehabilitation Game (Phase I - Feasibility)

Today's hospitals need innovative solutions to help patients transition from our care to self-management at home. The vast majority of the patients seen in Dodd Rehabilitation Hospital and associated clinics leave our care with persistent and life-altering challenges - behavioral, cognitive, emotional and/or physical. The period of time immediately following discharge is an under-addressed stage within the continuum of care. The investigators are researching solutions to help patients in this transition to self-care and believe that multiplayer gaming paradigms may be a promising innovation to facilitate this transition.

The investigators believe that Dr. Jane McGonigal's SuperBetter, and positive play games like it, are promising novel interventions that could make a positive difference in the ability of our patients to successfully transition to self care after discharge from therapeutic care.

Specifically, the investigators will evaluate feasibility of use of such a game by mild to moderate brain injured individuals and to record pilot data to help us plan a clinical effectiveness follow up study. Our goal is to finish this study with an intervention tailored for use within the clinical continuum of care and sufficient pilot data to prepare for a randomized clinical control trial of this intervention.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury; Concussion; Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: SuperBetter play

Detailed Description

Today's hospitals need innovative solutions to help patients transition from our care to self-management at home. The vast majority of the patients seen in Dodd Rehabilitation Hospital and associated clinics leave our care with persistent and life-altering challenges - behavioral, cognitive, emotional and/or physical. The period of time immediately following discharge is an under-addressed stage within the continuum of care. The investigators are researching solutions to help patients in this transition to self-care and believe that multiplayer gaming paradigms may be a promising innovation to facilitate this transition for several reasons:

1. Games can bring the power of social networks and alternate reality to bear on the real world work of post-injury self-management.
2. Games can use a digital platform, enabling quantification of performance in ways that could provide clinically-relevant documentation for post-discharge follow up efforts including tele-rehabilitation.
3. Today's youth are gamers. The investigators aim to tailor our rehabilitative approaches to leverage the existing ability of our youth in this paradigm. In addition, Dr. Jane McGonigal reports in her book, Reality is Broken, that within another decade the majority of the world's population will likely be gamers. The investigators aim to anticipate this shift and be ready for it.
4. Affordable games have the potential to be cost-effective aids and improvements over standard medical care protocols.

Despite the promise of games to facilitate transitions from hospital care to self care, no clinical studies have been done to establish best practices for applying gaming for rehabilitative purposes within the specific window of time in which discharge from standard care happens. While some commercially available games exist for those interested in health self-improvement, through companies such as That Game Company, Nintendo, Xbox, only the Nintendo Wii system has undergone clinical testing to demonstrate feasibility of use within the hospital-based model of patient care. Without more such evidence, the investigators are unable to confidently offer such novel interventions for our patients.

A new game, SuperBetter (SuperBetter, LLC, Sausilito, CA), has been developed to employ both social networking and alternate reality theory to achieve rehabilitative goals. SuperBetter is most similar to Facebook or Twitter in that users, or "gamers", create an account, invite others to be within their network, and post short status update messages. There are two major differences between SuperBetter and Twitter or Facebook, however. One difference is that this rehabilitation game will not offer a public option. The only people who can see a user's posts and status updates will have been specifically invited by that gamer; people outside the invited network will have no ability to "friend" a gamer, meaning there is no way to request to become part of a user's network - you must be invited by the account holder. The second difference is that SuperBetter assigns points to a gamer for attaining health goals such as: remembering to take medications each day; avoiding circumstances that exacerbate symptoms; checking in with someone within your trusted network (i.e. reaching out to your loved ones for support). Points are also assigned for "epic wins" which are defined by the patient and amount to things he or she cannot do today but want to be able to do tomorrow; this includes short term wins like hanging out with friends/loved ones or long term wins like getting back to playing sports.

The investigators believe that McGonigal's SuperBetter, and positive play games like it, are promising novel interventions that could make a positive difference in the ability of our patients to successfully transition to self care after discharge from therapeutic care. The investigators are conducting Phase I clinical testing (feasibility) to determine whether such a rehabilitation game is appropriate for use with: mild traumatic brain injured children and teens.

Specifically, the investigators will evaluate feasibility of use of such a game by mild traumatic brain injured individuals and to record pilot data to help us plan a clinical effectiveness follow up study. Our goal is to finish this study with an intervention tailored for use within the clinical continuum of care and sufficient pilot data to prepare for a randomized clinical control trial of this intervention.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 20
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Ohio
    • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
      • The Ohio State University Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 15 years to 25 years (Child, Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients: between 15 and 25 years old
• diagnosed within the last year with at least one traumatic brain injury (mild or moderate)
• subjective report of less than complete recovery from the injury
• easy access to computer with internet access
• compatible web browser (such as the latest version of Internet Explorer, Chrome, Firefox or other as determined by developers)
• has a support giver (18 or over) who is willing to participate in this study also

Exclusion Criteria:

● history of substance abuse as self reported by patient or reported by support giver

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SuperBetter Play; members of this group will play SuperBetter for 6 weeks (averaging 10 min per day of play for 6 week period)	Behavioral: SuperBetter play; average 10 min of game play per day for 6 week period

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Participation	Number of Participants who used the app and returned for post testing	8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Satisfaction With App	Satisfaction rating on a 7 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very satisfied) to 7 (very dissatisfied) among those who used the app and returned for post testing	8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Ohio State University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Lise Worthen-Chaudhari, MFA,MS,CCRC, Ohio State University

Publications and helpful links

Helpful Links

• Sponsor website
• Game designer website

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: May 1, 2014
• Primary Completion (Actual): January 1, 2015
• Study Completion (Actual): January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 19, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 19, 2011
• First Posted (Estimate): July 20, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 6, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 11, 2021
• Last Verified: March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: TBI; brain injury; concussion
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Craniocerebral Trauma; Trauma, Nervous System; Head Injuries, Closed; Wounds, Nonpenetrating; Brain Injuries; Wounds and Injuries; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Brain Concussion
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2011H0077