Manual Compared to Magnetic Navigation in Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

The purpose of this study is to compare manual and magnetic navigation in ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Trondheim, Norway
        • Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation at St. Olavs Hospital
  • Implanted Reveal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Magnetic navigation
Ablation with use of the magnetic navigation system
Experimental: Manual navigation
Atrial fibrillation ablation performed with manual navigation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation
Time Frame: 2 years
If the patient have had recurrence or not of atrial fibrillation after ablation. An implanted arrhythmia loop recorder (Reveal XT) is used for monitoring. Recurrence is defined as an attack of atrial fibrillation of more than 2 minutes. It will also be specified if the patient is referred for a second ablation procedure.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure time
Time Frame: Day 1(after ablation procedure)
Duration of the ablation procedure
Day 1(after ablation procedure)
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: Day 1(after ablation procedure)
Complications during and after the ablation procedure. Major: pericardial tamponade, permanent atrioventricular (AV) block, major bleeding, cerebral embolus, infection, heart failure, death. Minor: minor bleeding and temporary AV block.
Day 1(after ablation procedure)
Exposure of radiation to health personnel involved in the procedure
Time Frame: Day 1(after ablation procedure)
Total time with use of of radiation equipment. Radiation exposure of the operator.
Day 1(after ablation procedure)
Amount of analgetics and sedatives given during procedure
Time Frame: Day 1
As a measure of pain and discomfort experienced by the patient during the procedure, the amount of medications are assessed
Day 1
Pain
Time Frame: After ablation(day 1)
Pain scores on the Visual Analog Scale
After ablation(day 1)
Numbers of and types of catheters used
Time Frame: During ablation(Day1)
As a measure of resources needed for the procedure, the catheters used are registered. Numbers of and type of catheters are registered and total cost calculated.
During ablation(Day1)
Time with active ablation
Time Frame: During the procedure(Day 1)
Total time that electrical current has been used during the ablation
During the procedure(Day 1)
Total time nurses are occupied with the ablation
Time Frame: During the ablation(day 1)
As a measure of cost and resources needed for the procedure
During the ablation(day 1)
Myocardial damage
Time Frame: After ablation(day 1)
Measured by Troponin-t and CK-MBAs
After ablation(day 1)
Cardiac volumes and function
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by echocardiography
1 year
Quality of life
Time Frame: 2 years
Measured by SF-36 and atrial fibrillation symptoms and severity checklist
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jan Paal Loennechen, PhD, St. Olavs Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 2, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2010/3345-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Magnetic navigation

Subscribe