Comparison of VT Ablation Outcomes Using Remote MAGNETIC Navigation Versus Manual Approach in a Low LVEF Population (MAGNETIC-VT)

September 23, 2022 updated by: Stereotaxis

A Prospective, Multi-center, Post Market Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing VT Ablation Outcomes Using Remote MAGNETIC Navigation Guided Substrate Mapping and Ablation Versus Manual Approach in a Low LVEF Population

The study purpose is to demonstrate that ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation using the Niobe™ ES system results in superior outcomes compared to a manual approach in subjects with ischemic scar VT in a low ejection fraction population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized, single-blind, prospective, multi-center post market evaluation. Subjects will be screened for study eligibility and asked to complete written informed consent prior to any study specific testing assessments. After completing written informed consent, a total of 386 subjects will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive VT ablation treatment using either the Niobe ES or standard manual catheter ablation treatment using commercially available products. This will be the largest randomized VT study comparing outcomes from RMN to manually guided catheter ablation procedures. Subjects will be randomized according to a computer-generated randomization scheme. Randomization will be blocked at the study site level and subjects will be blinded to group assignment. Since quality of life measurements will be collected during follow-up, this study is single-blinded in order to mitigate patient bias. Clinical evaluations will not be masked to the treating physician.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

182

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
        • Westmead Hospital
      • Antwerpen, Belgium
        • ZNA Middelheim
    • West Flanders
      • Brugge, West Flanders, Belgium, 8000
        • AZ Sint-Jan
      • Praha, Czechia, 15030
        • Na Homolce Hospital
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Rigshospitalet
      • Nancy, France
        • CHU de Nancy - Hopitaux de Brabois
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG)
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Erasmus Medical Center
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
        • Florida Hospital
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Augusta University
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Medical Center
      • Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States, 60453
        • Advocate Christ Medical Center
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • The University of Kansas Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Weill Cornell Medical
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, United States, 84107
        • Intermountain Heart Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subject has had an ICD previously implanted
  • subject has drug-refractory monomorphic VT
  • subject is a candidate for ischemic VT RF ablation
  • subject has had a myocardial infarction
  • subject has a LVEF less than or equal to 35%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subject has non-ischemic VT
  • subject has a history of stroke within 1 month prior to enrollment
  • subject has had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to enrollment
  • subject has unstable angina
  • subject has undergone cardiac surgery within 60 days prior to enrollment
  • subject is pregnant or nursing
  • subject has a limited life expectancy of 1 year or less (Subjects requiring LVAD/IABP intraprocedural support may be enrolled as long as life expectancy is at least 1 year following the ablation procedure.)
  • subject is unable or unwilling to cooperate with study procedures
  • subject has a known presence of intracardiac thrombi as determined by echocardiography
  • subject has a major contraindication to anticoagulation therapy or coagulation disorder
  • subject has had a previous pericarditis or cardiac tumor
  • subject has had previous thoracic radiation therapy
  • any other reason the investigator considers the subject ineligible

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Magnetic navigation
Catheter ablation using magnetic navigation for ventricular tachycardia via remote magnetic navigation of a NaviStar RMT ThermoCool catheter, or other magnetically compatible catheter, via Stereotaxis's Niobe ES system.
elimination of cardiac arrhythmias through heating and destroying heart tissue with faulty electrical pathways through the use of Stereotaxis's Niobe ES System with the NaviStar RMT ThermoCool catheter or other magnetically compatible catheters.
Active Comparator: Manual navigation
Catheter ablation using manual navigation for ventricular tachycardia via a manually navigated Thermocool catheter, or equivalent catheter.
elimination of cardiac arrhythmias through heating and destroying heart tissue with faulty electrical pathways through the use of the NaviStar ThermoCool catheter or other manually navigated catheters.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
freedom from any VT in the overall cohort
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
acute success of procedure
Time Frame: at end of procedure (immediate)
non-inducibility of clinical VT and/or other monomorphic VT using typical stimulation protocol for induction
at end of procedure (immediate)
freedom from VT in large scar subpopulation
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
major adverse events
Time Frame: 48 hours post-procedure
death, cardiac tamponade, stroke, bleeding requiring surgical intervention, progressive heart failure related to VT/VF recurrence
48 hours post-procedure
mortality rate
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of appropriate ICD defibrillator shocks
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Total number of ICD applications of anti-tachycardia pacing
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Total procedure time (skin to skin)
Time Frame: through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Total fluoroscopy time
Time Frame: through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Total fluoroscopy dose
Time Frame: through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Total mapping time
Time Frame: through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Total ablation time
Time Frame: through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Total mapping points prior to ablation
Time Frame: through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Total ablation energy delivery
Time Frame: through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Watts X seconds / Total scar surface area
through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Patient quality of life (SF-12)
Time Frame: 12 months
Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form Health Survey
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tachycardia, Ventricular

Clinical Trials on catheter ablation using magnetic navigation

3
Subscribe