DURABILITY+ : a Prospective, Multi-center, Controlled Study With the Everflex+ Stent in SFA Lesions (DURABILITY+)

September 30, 2013 updated by: Flanders Medical Research Program

DURABILITY+ : a Prospective, Multi-center, Controlled Study Measuring the Durability in Lesions of the Superficial Femoral Artery of the Protégé Everflex+ Stent

The objective of this study is to evaluate the immediate and long-term (up to 12 months) safety and effectiveness of primary stenting with the Protégé Everflex+ stent system for the treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions (without involvement of the popliteal artery) between 40 mm and 180 mm in length.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Antwerp
      • Bonheiden, Antwerp, Belgium, 2820
        • Imelda Hospital
      • Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium, 2650
        • University Hospital Antwerp
    • East-Flanders
      • Dendermonde, East-Flanders, Belgium, 9200
        • A.Z. Sint-Blasius

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

General Inclusion Criteria:

  • De novo, restenotic or reoccluded (from PTA or adjunct therapy, not including stents or stent grafts) lesion located in the superficial femoral artery (without popliteal involvement) with proximal point at least one centimeter below the origin of the profunda femoralis and suitable for stenting
  • Patient presenting with a score from 2 to 4 following Rutherford classification
  • Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations at the specified times
  • Patient is >18 years old
  • Patient (or their legal representative) understands the nature of the procedure and provides written informed consent, prior to enrollment in the study

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria

  • The length of the target lesion is minimally 40 mm and maximally 180 mm, to be covered with one stent
  • The target lesion has angiographic evidence of stenosis or restenosis > 50% or occlusion which can be passed with standard guidewire manipulation
  • Target vessel diameter visually estimated is >3.5 mm and <7.5 mm
  • Prior to enrollment, the guidewire has crossed target lesion
  • There is angiographic evidence of at least one-vessel-runoff to the foot, irrespective of whether or not outflow was re-established by means of previous endovascular intervention
  • Patient is eligible for treatment with the Protégé Everflex+ stent system

General Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of another stent or stent graft in the target vessel that was placed during a previous procedure
  • Previous by-pass surgery in the same limb requiring access to the target lesion
  • Patients for whom antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulants or thrombolytic drugs are contraindicated or no alternative is available
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to nickel-titanium
  • Patients with uncorrected bleeding disorders
  • Female patient with child bearing potential not using adequate contraceptives or currently breastfeeding
  • Life expectancy of less than twelve months
  • Use of thrombectomy, artherectomy, cryoplasty, cutting balloon, drug-eluting balloon, embolic protection or laser devices during procedure
  • Any patient considered to be hemodynamically unstable at onset of procedure
  • Patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not completed the entire follow up period.

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria

  • Presence of an aortic thrombosis or significant common femoral ipsilateral stenosis
  • Patients who exhibit persistent acute intraluminal thrombus of the proposed target lesion site
  • Perforation, dissection or other injury of the access site or target vessel requiring additional stenting or surgical intervention prior to start of the index procedure
  • Perforation at the angioplasty site evidenced by extravasation of contrast medium
  • Aneurysm located at the level of the SFA and/or proximal popliteal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Protégé EverFlex+
Stenting with Protégé EverFlex+
  • pre-dilation of the study lesion is mandatory
  • stent placement with 1 Protégé Everflex+ stent
  • only 1 stent is allowed within the study protocol
  • post-dilation may be performed but is not mandatory
Other Names:
  • Protégé EverFlex+

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major Adverse Event rate
Time Frame: 30 days post-procedure
The primary safety endpoint of the study is the Major Adverse Event (MAE) rate at 30 days. MAE is defined as: clinically-driven target lesion revascularization, amputation of treated limb or all-cause mortality through 30 days post procedure.
30 days post-procedure
Primary stent patency
Time Frame: 12 months post-procedure
The primary effectiveness endpoint of the study is primary stent patency at 12 months. Primary patency is defined as absence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) at the target lesion and without TLR within 12 months.
12 months post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success
Time Frame: 1 day post-procedure
Technical success, defined as the ability to cross and stent the lesion, after predilation, and with or without additional post-dilation, and achieve residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30%
1 day post-procedure
Primary stent patency at 1 and 6 months
Time Frame: 1 and 6 months post-procedure
Primary patency at 1, 6 months. Primary patency is defined as absence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) at the target lesion and without TLR within the time of procedure and the given follow-up.
1 and 6 months post-procedure
Primary assisted patency
Time Frame: 1, 6 and 12 months post-procedure
Primary assisted patency rate at 1, 6, 12-month follow-up. Defined as flow through the treated lesion maintained by repeat percutaneous intervention completed prior to complete vessel closure.
1, 6 and 12 months post-procedure
Secondary patency
Time Frame: 1, 6 and 12 months post-procedure
Secondary patency rate at 1, 6, 12-month follow-up. Defined as flow through the treated lesion maintained by repeat percutaneous intervention after occlusion of the target lesion.
1, 6 and 12 months post-procedure
Target lesion revascularization
Time Frame: 12 months post-procedure
Target lesion revascularization (TLR) is defined as a repeat intervention, within the study follow-up period of 12 months, to maintain or re-establish patency within the region of the treated arterial vessel plus 5 mm proximal and distal to the treated lesion edge.
12 months post-procedure
limb-salvage
Time Frame: 12-months post-procedure
Limb-salvage rate at all follow-up visits for the subgroup of patients with critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category 4), defined as absence of major amputation. Major amputation is defined as amputation at or above the ankle, as opposed to minor amputation, being an amputation at or below metatarsal level, preserving functionality of the foot)
12-months post-procedure
Clinical success
Time Frame: 1, 6 and 12 months post-procedure
Clinical success at follow-up, defined as an improvement of Rutherford classification at 1 day and 1, 6, 12-month follow-up of one class or more as compared to the pre-procedure Rutherford classification
1, 6 and 12 months post-procedure
Serious adverse events
Time Frame: 12-months post-procedure
Serious adverse events defined as any clinical event that is fatal, life-threatening, or judged to be severe by the investigator; resulted in persistent or significant disability; necessitated surgical or percutaneous intervention; or required prolonged hospitalization.
12-months post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 9, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease

Clinical Trials on stent placement

Subscribe