The Head Impulse Test in the Screening of Vestibular Function

June 27, 2013 updated by: Meir Medical Center

The alternate binaural bithermal caloric test (ABBT) is a well established examination in the evaluation of the dizzy patient. ABBT is useful in detecting the side of peripheral vestibulopathy by stimulating each ear separately, it contributes to the diagnosis of bilateral vestibular involvement when all responses to cold and warm stimuli are reduced, and adds to the differentiation of peripheral from central vestibular involvement by measuring the fixation-induced inhibition of the caloric response. In spite of these benefits, ABBT is the most time-consuming part of the electronystagmography/Videonystagmography (ENG/VNG) test battery, and frequently causes significant inconvenience to the patient due to the repeated extreme vestibular stimuli.

The head impulse test (HIT) assesses vestibular function by brisk, passive rotations of the head in the plane of the examined semicircular canals. Whenever the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is deficient, this maneuver would produce catch-up saccades aiming to the re-fixation of the eyes on the target. Hence, both residual VOR and catch-up saccades act synergistically to stabilize gaze. The HIT requires only several minutes and might cause minimal discomfort only.

The study hypothesis is that the HIT recorded by standard VNG equipment of the VNG system would provide diagnostic information on the side of vestibular involvement matching that of the ABBT.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Haifa, Israel, 35152
        • Otoneurology Unit, Lin Medical Center, 35 Rotchild Avenue

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Tertiary center patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Videonystagmography(VNG) test battery is indicated for the diagnosis of dizziness or vertigo

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Signs of retrocochlear lesion or central vestibular pathology in bed-side otoneurological examination or audiometry or ENG/VNG
  • Age < 18 years
  • Otitis externa
  • Otitis media
  • Tympanic membrane perforation
  • Status Post Mastoidectomy
  • Limitations of neck movements in the horizontal plain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the recorded HIT results in the prediction of the caloric test lateralization parameter
Time Frame: 18 months
Sensitivity would be calculated according to the following formula: Number of participants in whom catch-up saccades would be recorded and caloric test lateralization would be greater than 25% divided by the sum of number of participants in whom catch-up saccades would be recorded and caloric test lateralization would be greater than 25% plus the number of participants in whom no catch-up saccades would be recorded and caloric test lateralization would be greater than 25% (number of true positives /(number of true positives + number of false negatives))
18 months
Specificity of the VNG recorded HIT results in the prediction of the caloric test lateralization parameter
Time Frame: 18 months
Specificity would be calculated according to the following formula: Number of participants in whom no catch-up saccades would be recorded and caloric test lateralization would be smaller than 25% divided by the sum of number of participants in whom no catch-up saccades would be recorded and caloric test lateralization would be smaller than 25% plus the number of participants in whom catch-up saccades would be recorded and caloric test lateralization would be smaller than 25% (number of true negatives /(number of true negatives + number of false positives))
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the bed-side HIT examination results in the prediction of the caloric test lateralization parameter
Time Frame: 18 months
Sensitivity = Number of participants in whom catch-up saccades would be diagnosed in the HIT bed-side examination and caloric test lateralization would be greater than 25% divided by the sum of number of participants in whom catch-up saccades would be diagnosed in the HIT bed-side examination and caloric test lateralization would be greater than 25% plus the number of participants in whom no catch-up saccades would be diagnosed and caloric test lateralization would be greater than 25% (number of true positives /(number of true positives +number of false negatives))
18 months
Specificity of the bed-side HIT examination results in the prediction of the caloric test lateralization parameter
Time Frame: 18 months
Specificity would be calculated according to the following formula: Number of participants with no catch-up saccades in the HIT bed-side examination and caloric test lateralization smaller than 25% divided by the sum of number of participants in with catch-up saccades in the HIT bed-side examination and caloric test lateralization smaller than 25% plus the number of participants with catch-up saccades in the HIT bed-side examination and caloric test lateralization smaller than 25% (number of true negatives /(number of true negatives + number of false positives))
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vertigo

Clinical Trials on Video recording of Head Impulse Test

3
Subscribe