- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01474291
An Observational Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) As Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Routine Clinical Practice (ACT SOLO)
Evaluation of Factors Influencing Use of RoActemra® as Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in a Real Life Setting - ACT SOLO
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aix Les Bains, France, 73106
-
Amiens, France, 80000
-
Amiens, France, 80054
-
Angers, France, 49933
-
Auch, France, 32008
-
Aulnay Sous Bois, France, 93602
-
Avignon, France, 84902
-
Bastia, France, 20604
-
Bayonne, France, 64109
-
Beauvais, France, 60021
-
Belfort, France, 90016
-
Belley, France, 01306
-
Berck, France, 62608
-
Besancon, France, 25030
-
Bobigny, France, 93009
-
Bois Guillaume, France, 76233
-
Bondy, France, 93143
-
Bonneville, France, 74136
-
Bordeaux, France, 33076
-
Bordeaux, France, 33075
-
Boulogne-billancourt, France, 92104
-
Bressuire, France, 79302
-
Brest, France, 29609
-
Bry Sur Marne, France, 94366
-
Caen, France, 14033
-
Cahors, France, 46005
-
Cannes, France, 06401
-
Carcassonne, France, 11890
-
Chambray Les Tours, France, 37170
-
Chambray Les Tours, France, 37171
-
Chateauroux, France, 36019
-
Clermont-ferrand, France, 63003
-
Colmar, France, 68024
-
Compiegne, France, 60321
-
Corbeil Essonnes, France, 91106
-
Corbeil-essones, France, 91106
-
Creteil, France, 94010
-
Denain, France, 59723
-
Digne Les Bains, France, 04000
-
Dijon, France, 21000
-
Dole, France, 39108
-
Draguignan, France, 83300
-
Druex, France, 28102
-
Echirolles, France, 38434
-
Epernay, France, 51200
-
Evian Les Bains, France, 74500
-
Evreux, France, 27015
-
Evry, France, 91024
-
Frejus, France, 83608
-
Freyming Merlebach, France, 57804
-
GAP, France, 05000
-
Gleize, France, 69400
-
Haguenau, France, 67500
-
Ivry Sur Seine, France, 94200
-
Laon, France, 02001
-
Lavaur, France, 81500
-
Le Bouscat, France, 33491
-
Le Coudray, France, 28630
-
Le Kremlin Bicetre, France, 94275
-
Libourne, France, 33505
-
Lievin, France, 62806
-
Lille, France, 59037
-
Limoges, France, 87042
-
Limoges, France, 87100
-
Lomme, France, 59462
-
Lyon, France, 69437
-
Lyon, France, 69002
-
Maisons Laffitte, France, 78600
-
Marseille, France, 13006
-
Marseille, France, 13274
-
Marseille, France, 13384
-
Metz Tessy, France, 74370
-
Montauban, France, 82017
-
Montpellier, France, 34295
-
Moulins, France, 03000
-
Mulhouse, France, 68070
-
Nanterre, France, 92014
-
Nantes, France, 44035
-
Narbonne, France, 11108
-
Nevers, France, 58000
-
Nice, France, 06202
-
Nimes, France, 30029
-
Orange, France, 84106
-
Paris, France, 75651
-
Paris, France, 75475
-
Paris, France, 75571
-
Paris, France, 75679
-
Paris, France, 75877
-
Paris, France, 75960
-
Perigueux, France, 24019
-
Perpignan, France, 66046
-
Pierre Benite, France, 69495
-
Poissy, France, 78303
-
Pontoise, France, 95300
-
Reims, France, 51092
-
Rennes, France, 35203
-
Rodez, France, 12027
-
Roubaix, France, 59056
-
Salon De Provence, France, 13658
-
St Brieuc, France, 22027
-
St Chamond, France, 42403
-
St Mande, France, 94163
-
St Priest En Jarez, France, 42277
-
Ste Maxime, France, 83120
-
Strasbourg, France, 67098
-
Suresnes, France, 92151
-
Thionville, France, 57126
-
Toulon, France, 83041
-
Toulouse, France, 31059
-
Toulouse, France, 31076
-
Toulouse, France, 31077
-
Tourcoing, France, 59208
-
Valenciennes, France, 59300
-
Valenciennes, France, 59322
-
Vandoeuvre-les-nancy, France, 54511
-
Vannes, France, 56017
-
Villeneuve St Georges, France, 94195
-
Villeurbanne, France, 69626
-
Vlleneuve Sur Lot, France, 47307
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
- Patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom the rheumatologist decides to start tocilizumab in combination with DMARD or as monotherapy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current participation in a clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Tocilizumab
Tocilizumab administered as monotherapy or in combination with other standard of care therapy according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice.
|
Tocilizumab administered according to prescribing information and normal clinical practice.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Assigned Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab as Part of Combination Therapy at Study Inclusion
Time Frame: Day 1
|
The number of participants assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy versus tocilizumab combination therapy is reported.
A multivariate analysis was performed to search for predictive factors for the initiation of tocilizumab in monotherapy.
|
Day 1
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Methotrexate (MTX)
Time Frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
|
The percentage of participants who discontinued MTX treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation. Reason for discontinuation "Other Intolerance" = intolerance other than cytopenia or hepatic cytolysis. |
Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Leflunomide
Time Frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
|
The percentage of participants who discontinued leflunomide treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
|
Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Sulfasalazine
Time Frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
|
The percentage of participants who discontinued sulfasalazine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
|
Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Hydroxychloroquine
Time Frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
|
The percentage of participants who discontinued hydroxychloroquine treatment prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
|
Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab Monotherapy Who Discontinued Unspecified Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Time Frame: Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
|
The percentage of participants who discontinued treatment with unspecified csDMARDs prior to being assigned to tocilizumab monotherapy is presented by reason for discontinuation.
|
Day 1 (assessment of discontinuations within prior 2 years)
|
|
Mean Number of Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period
Time Frame: Up to 30 months
|
Up to 30 months
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab Infusions Over the Study Period
Time Frame: Up to 13.4 months
|
The percentage of participants who received infusions is presented by category of total infusions received over the study period.
|
Up to 13.4 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants With No Modification of Tocilizumab Treatment Over the Study Period
Time Frame: Up to 30 months
|
The percentage of participants with no modifications (dose modification or discontinuation) is presented.
|
Up to 30 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least One csDMARD Intensification During the Study
Time Frame: Up to 30 months
|
csDMARD intensification was defined as an addition of a csDMARD without suppression of other csDMARD, dose increase of a csDMARD, switch (addition and suppression) of a csDMARD without intolerance, biological abnormality or symptom improvement to the suppressed csDMARD, or modification of the MTX administration route (from oral route to intramuscular/subcutaneous) with dose increase or maintenance.
|
Up to 30 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
|
DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
A score of ≤3.2 was considered to be DAS28-ESR LDA.
Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
|
Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
|
DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
A score of <2.6 was considered to be DAS28-ESR remission.
Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
|
Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) LDA at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
|
CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
A score of ≤10 was considered to be CDAI LDA.
Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
|
Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Remission at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
|
CDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
A score of ≤2.8 was considered to be CDAI remission.
Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
|
Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) LDA at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
|
SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligrams per liter (mg/L)) per , and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
A score of ≤11 was considered to be SDAI LDA.
Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
|
Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants With SDAI Remission at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
|
SDAI was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, CRP (mg/L), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity; SDAI scores range from 0 to 86, where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
A score of ≤3.3 was considered to be SDAI remission.
Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
|
Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants With American College or Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
|
ACR20/50/70 response was calculated as improvement (from baseline) of at least 20/50/70% (respectively) of tender and of swollen joints, and improvement from baseline of least 20/50/70% (respectively) in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: participant's pain assessment, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) score, and ESR (mm/hour) or CRP (mg/L).
Participants with missing data were considered to have failed to achieve the outcome.
|
Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
|
EULAR response was categorized as good or moderate response and was calculated as the difference between DAS28-ESR scores at baseline and Month 12. DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity; scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
|
Month 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline; Month 6; Month 12
|
The HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform daily living activities.
This composite index score ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (total functional disability) and includes questions regarding 8 domains (dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week).
A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state.
|
Baseline; Month 6; Month 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score
Time Frame: Baseline; Month 6, Month 12
|
The RAID questionnaire is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating the impact of rheumatoid arthritis on participant quality of life.
This composite index score ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst) and includes questions regarding 7 domains (pain, functional disability assessment, fatigue, sleep, physical well-being, emotional well-being, coping).
A decrease in score corresponds to improvement in participant-assessed health state.
|
Baseline; Month 6, Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Health State Assessed by the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Questionnaire.
Time Frame: Baseline; Month 6; Month 12
|
Participants were asked: "If you were to remain in the same condition for the next few months as you have been over the last 8 days, would this be 1) acceptable, 2) unacceptable?"
The percentage of participants who responded "acceptable" at each time point is presented.
|
Baseline; Month 6; Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 30 months
|
An adverse event was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding if accompanied by clinical symptoms, results in a change in study treatment, results in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy or clinically significant in the investigator's judgment), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
|
Up to 30 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ML27873
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCWithdrawnActive Rheumatoid Arthritis; Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Centocor, Inc.CompletedRheumatoid Arthritis, Juvenile
-
Yuanyuan ZhangRecruitingRheumatoid Arthritis (RA) | Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease | Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid ArthritisChina
-
AmgenTerminated
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
AmgenImmunex CorporationCompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Richard Burt, MDTerminated
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisSociete Francaise de RhumatologieRecruiting
-
University Hospital, ToulouseCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisFrance
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcEuropean CommissionCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisNetherlands, Germany, Portugal, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia
Clinical Trials on Tocilizumab
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruiting
-
University of ChicagoRecruiting
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityNot yet recruitingGranulomatous Mastitis | Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisFresenius AGNot yet recruitingCalcium Pyrophosphate Deposition DiseaseFrance
-
Hoffmann-La RocheRecruiting
-
Nationwide Children's HospitalChildren's Hospital ColoradoRecruitingAdamantinomatous Craniopharyngioma | Recurrent Adamantinomatous CraniopharyngiomaUnited States, Australia, Canada
-
Queen's Medical CenterTerminatedCOVID-19United States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompleted
-
Capital Medical UniversityRecruiting
-
Capital Medical UniversityRecruiting