Effects of Mutations of the Glycine Gene Associated With Hyperekplexia on Central Pain Processing

September 3, 2014 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne
Mutations in genes affecting pain transmission start to be known, the investigators are investigating a mutation in a glycine channel, which has an influence on pain modulation. Pain modulation is the ability of the central nervous system to enhance or diminish the sensation of pain. The investigators therefore will test patients and healthy volunteers with quantitative sensory tests, basically determining the point at which a stimulation just starts to induce pain. These tests are reliable and permit a direct comparison between healthy volunteers and patients with the affected glycine gene.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background

Hyperekplexia, also known as hereditary startle disease or stiff baby syndrome, is a rare neurogenetic non-epileptic disorder characterized by exaggerated persistent startle response and neonatal hypertonia to unexpected auditory, somatosensory and visual stimuli. Startle responses and generalized muscle stiffness both gradually subside during the first months of life. Pathological startle responses can remain throughout adulthood resulting in unprotected falls and injury.

Hereditary hyperekplexia has been identified in 70 pedigrees, most of them being characterized by the major form. Some occasional occurrence of the minor form was described in rare families, but its presence may remain clinically undetected.

The clinical diagnosis of the major form of hyperekplexia needs three mandatory features:

  1. Generalized stiffness after birth normalizing during the first years of life
  2. Excessive startling to an unexpected stimulus, particularly auditory, present from birth and remaining throughout life
  3. Generalized stiffness after a startle reflex that lasts a few seconds Five genes are associated with hyperekplexia, the disease being caused by mutations in the genes encoding different subunits of the inhibitory postsynaptic glycine receptor GLRA1 and GLRB. Additionally defects in the presynaptic glycine transporter gene (SLC6A5) have been recently identified in human hyperekplexia. GPHN, encoding the glycinergic clustering molecule gephyrin, and ARHGEF9, an X-linked gene encoding collybistin, are each associated with one known case of hyperekplexia.

The glycine receptor is a member of the pentameric ligand-gated ion channel family. The receptor is a membrane-embedded protein that contains an integral Cl- -selective pore. The glycine receptor is the major determinant of inhibitory neurotransmission in the retina, spinal cord and brainstem.

Inhibitory synaptic transmission in the spinal cord dorsal horn use GABA and glycine as their principle fast neurotransmitters. Both of them open the Cl- -channels, which induce postsynaptic hyperpolarisation and impairs the propagation of excitatory potentials on dendrites of neurons. Immunofluorescence studies have revealed abundant glycinergic innervations in the dorsal horn, site attributed to the long standing gate control theory of pain. According to this model, inhibitory GABAergic and glycinergic interneurons in the superficial spinal dorsal horn are key components in the control of pain transmission from the periphery to the brain. The model states that a non-painful stimulation is felt as non painful as long as the synaptic GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition remains intact.

Pharmacological blockade of GABAergic and/or glycinergic neurotransmission in the dorsal horn mimics many symptoms of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Additionally, a loss of synaptic inhibition in the dorsal horn occurs in animal models of experimental pain. This is difficult to prove experimentally in humans, although studies on nociceptive long term potentiation suggest that loss of inhibitory interneurons in the dorsal horn may have a role in the development of chronic pain in patients.

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate for the first time in humans whether symptomatic mutations in the glycinergic system affect central pain processing. Positive results would be suggestive for an important role of the glycinergic system in pain modulation and would therefore stimulate further developments for the pharmacological modulation of human pain syndromes.

Methods

Design Assessment of pain thresholds in consecutive hyperekplexia patients and a group of sex and age-matched healthy volunteers.

Subjects We will test consecutive patients with one of the five mutations cited in the introduction. Patients will receive a compensation of 150 Swiss Francs for their participation, plus reimbursement of travel costs.

23 hyperekplexia patients will be recruited. Once the testing of these patients is completed, 45 healthy age and sex-matched controls will be enrolled.

Treatment with a GABA-agonist (mainly clonazepam) will not be discontinued for safety reasons .

Pain tests:

Pressure pain detection threshold (primary outcome) Electric pain detection threshold to single cutaneous and temporal summation to repeated electrical stimulation Heat and cold pain detection, conditioned pain modulation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Dep. of Anesthesia and Pain medicine, Bern University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hyperekplexia
  • GLRA1
  • GLRB
  • SCLA5
  • GPHN
  • Gephyrin
  • ARHGEF9

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age below 7 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Breast feeding
  • Ongoing medication
  • Cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1

In the setting of comparing patients with a genetic mutation and healthy volunteers blinding of the PI would demand a substantial increase in co-workers (i.e. recruitment, selection of age-and sex matched volunteers), reason why no blinding was chosen.

Affected patients will be compared to age and sex matched volunteers, recruited after completion of testing 23 hyperekplexia patients.

The testing will be the same for healthy volunteers and patients with a mutations in the glycine channel.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pressure pain detection threshold measured in kPA, measured with electronic pressure algometer applied at the centre of the pulp of the 2nd toe
Time Frame: Within 0 to 33 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation
Pain detection thresholds will be measured with an electronic pressure algometer applied at the center of the pulp of the 2nd toe. The probe has a surface area of 1 cm2. The pressure is increased from 0 at a rate of 30kPa/s to a maximum pressure of 1000kPa. Pain detection threshold is defined as the point at which the pressure sensation turns to pain. The subjects are instructed to press a button when these points are reached. The algometer displays the pressure intensity at which the button is pressed.
Within 0 to 33 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Electric pain reflex, as measured with electromyography from the biceps femoris and the rectus femoris muscles
Time Frame: Within 50 to 150 ms after the beginning of stimulation
Electromyographic (EMG) reflex responses to electrical stimulation will be recorded from the middle of the biceps femoris and the rectus femoris muscles (Ag/AgCl-electrodes). A 25 ms, train-of-five, 1 ms, square-wave impulse (perceived as a single stimulus), will be delivered. The current intensity will be increased from 1 mA in steps of 1 mA until: 1) a biceps femoris reflex with an amplitude exceeding 20 mV for at least 10 ms in the 50-150 ms post-stimulation interval will be detected (single stimulus reflex threshold); and 2) a pain sensation will be evoked (single stimulus pain threshold).
Within 50 to 150 ms after the beginning of stimulation
Heat and cold pain detection thresholds, as measured with a thermode in degrees Celsius
Time Frame: Within 0 to 14 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation
A thermode will be applied to the skin. The temperature of the thermode will be continuously increased from 30 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC at a rate of 1.5 ºC/s. Pain detection threshold is defined as for pressure stimulation. The subjects are instructed to press a button when this point is reached. For cold stimulation, the temperature of the thermode will be continuously decreased from 30 ºC to a minimum of 0 ºC at a rate of 1.5 ºC/sec. Pain detection threshold is defined as for pressure stimulation. The subjects are instructed to press a button when this point is reached.
Within 0 to 14 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation
Ice water pain threshold of the hand as measured in seconds the hand was left in the water, measured with ice water container
Time Frame: Within 0 to 2 minutes after the beginning of the stimulation
The device consists of a container separated into an outer and an inner part by a mesh screen. The mesh screen prevents direct contact between the ice (placed in the outer part) and the hand of the subject (placed in the inner part). The water is regularly mixed to maintain the temperature in the inner part near to 0°C. The subject places his hand, wide open and to the wrist, into the inner part of the container. He is asked to keep it in the water until he feels an intolerable sensation of pain and is forced to remove his hand from the container, in any case for a maximum time of 2 min.
Within 0 to 2 minutes after the beginning of the stimulation
Pressure pain detection threshold measured in kPA, measured with electronic pressure algometer applied at the centre of the pulp of the 2nd toe
Time Frame: At the end of the experiment, expected to be after 30 minutes on average
Pain detection thresholds will be measured with an electronic pressure algometer applied at the center of the pulp of the 2nd toe. The probe has a surface area of 1 cm2. The pressure is increased from 0 at a rate of 30kPa/s to a maximum pressure of 1000kPa. Pain detection threshold is defined as the point at which the pressure sensation turns to pain. The subjects are instructed to press a button when these points are reached. The algometer displays the pressure intensity at which the button is pressed.
At the end of the experiment, expected to be after 30 minutes on average

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Michele Curatolo, Prof., Dep. of Anesthesia and Pain medicine, Bern University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 22, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 4, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperekplexia

  • Hospices Civils de Lyon
    Not yet recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
    Completed
    CTNNB1 Gene Mutation | Hyperekplexia
    France
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle
    Sanofi; Takeda; University of Liege; Orchard Therapeutics; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia | Hemophilia A | Hemophilia B | Mucopolysaccharidosis I | Mucopolysaccharidosis II | Cystic Fibrosis | Alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency | Sickle Cell Disease | Fanconi Anemia | Chronic Granulomatous Disease | Wilson Disease | Severe Congenital Neutropenia | Ornithine Transcarbamylase... and other conditions
    Belgium

Clinical Trials on No intervention

3
Subscribe