A Positron Emission Topographic (PET) Study on Depression Patient With Electroacupuncture

December 4, 2015 updated by: Prof. Zhang Zhang-Jin, The University of Hong Kong

The Identification of Central Neural Network for Antidepressant Effects of Dense Cranial Electroacupuncture Stimulation - a Positron Emission Topographic (PET) Study

This is a randomized, assessor-blind, placebo controlled study in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients. Subjects receiving antidepressant drug (FLX) would be assigned to receive either 18 sham / active DCEAS for in 6 weeks. Changes in the severity of depressive symptoms over time are measured using depression rating scales. Brain glucose metabolic levels are measured using PET at baseline and endpoint. The most intriguing and expected result might be that acupuncture treated-patients may display comparable or even better outcomes and the clinical improvements by acupuncture are correlated with the restoration of the activities in the related brain regions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although the development of various classes of antidepressant drugs, represented by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), has considerably improved the prognosis and the tolerability in the treatment of depressive disorders, the currently available antidepressant therapy is still incomplete, because there are about 40% of depressed individuals who cannot obtain full response and a large proportion of the patients experience recurrent episodes.

Recently the principal investigator has completed a clinical trial to test whether dense cranial electroacupuncture stimulation (DCEAS) could enhance the antidepressant efficacy in the early phase of SSRI treatment (fluoxetine, FLX) of major depressive disorder (MDD). It was found that DCEAS is clinically safe and effective in augmenting the antidepressant efficacy in early SSRI treatment. As we hypothesize that this normalizing effect is associated with the modulation of various nervous functions associated with the pathophysiology of MDD, we design this neuroimaging (PET) DCEAS study to delineate the related mechanisms.

The objective of this study are:

1) To compare clinical improvements on depressive symptoms between DCEAS and FLX monotherapy in MDD subjects; (2) To determine the effects of DCEAS treatment on glucose metabolic levels in related brain regions in comparison with healthy controls and FLX-treated patients, using PET scanning; and (3) To correlate between clinical improvements and changes in PET-measured activities of related brain regions in a pool of the subjects treated with DCEAS and FLX.

In this 6-week, assessor-blind, randomized, controlled study of DCEAS as additional treatment with the antidepressant drug FLX, a total of 82 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) will be recruited. The patients will be randomly assigned to FLX (10-30 mg/day) combined with sham (n =41) or FLX with active DCEAS (n =41) (18 sessions, 3 sessions a week). Changes in the severity of depressive symptoms over time are measured using depressive instruments. Clinical response and remission rates are also calculated. Two sessions of PET scan will be conducted at baseline and endpoint. The study will be conducted at HKU School of Chinese Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, and Kowloon Hospital, Hong Kong.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Guangzhou, China
        • School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University
      • Hong Kong, China
        • Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital
      • Kowloon, China
        • Department of Psychiatry, Kowloon Hospital
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. with righthandedness;
  2. have first-episode MDD diagnosed as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV); and
  3. HAMD-17 score is ≥ 20; and
  4. never had any psychoactive medications.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. unstable medical conditions;
  2. have suicidal ideas or attempts or aggressive behavior;
  3. previously experienced manic, hypomanic, or mixed episode;
  4. immediate family members have bipolar or psychotic disorders;
  5. treatment with investigational drugs in past 6 months;
  6. alcoholism or drug abuse in past 1 year; or
  7. have needle phobia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: DCEAS

Dense cranial electroacupuncture stimulation (DCEAS)

For those who were currently under antidepressant treatment, they would continue the existing treatment regimens. For those who were not medicated at the time of trial, fluoxetine (FLX) was given at an initiate dose of 10 mg/day and escalated to an optimal dose within one week, based on individual response, but the maximum dose was set at 40 mg/day.

Subjects of both study arms received orally administered SSRIs for 4 weeks in an open manner. For those who were currently under antidepressant treatment, they would continue the existing treatment regimens. For those who were not medicated at the time of trial, fluoxetine (FLX) was given at an initiate dose of 10 mg/day and escalated to an optimal dose within one week, based on individual response, but the maximum dose was set at 40 mg/day.
Other Names:
  • Prozac
  • Sarafem
  • Lovan
  • Fontex
  • Zactin
  • Fluohexal
  • Auscap
  • Depreks
  • Floxet
  • Flunil
  • Fluox
  • Fluzac
  • Fluxen

Six pairs of cranial acupoints are used: Baihui (Du-20) and Yintang (EX-HN3), left Sishencong (EX-HN1) and Toulinqi (GB15), right Sishencong (EX-HN1) and Toulinqi (GB15), bilateral Shuaigu (GB8), bilateral Taiyang (EX-HN5), and bilateral Touwei (ST8). All these acupoints are located on the forehead.

Disposable acupuncture needles (Hwato®/ Dongbang®, 0.30 mm in diameter and 25-40 mm in length) are inserted at a depth of 10-30 mm obliquely into acupoints, on which low- and high-frequency alternating electrical stimulation with continuous waves is conducted for 30 min. The intensity is adjusted to a level at which patients feel comfortable.

Other Names:
  • Hwato®
  • Dongbang®
Sham Comparator: n-CEA

Non-invasive cranial electroacupuncture (n-CEA)

For those who were currently under antidepressant treatment, they would continue the existing treatment regimens. For those who were not medicated at the time of trial, fluoxetine (FLX) was given at an initiate dose of 10 mg/day and escalated to an optimal dose within one week, based on individual response, but the maximum dose was set at 40 mg/day.

Subjects of both study arms received orally administered SSRIs for 4 weeks in an open manner. For those who were currently under antidepressant treatment, they would continue the existing treatment regimens. For those who were not medicated at the time of trial, fluoxetine (FLX) was given at an initiate dose of 10 mg/day and escalated to an optimal dose within one week, based on individual response, but the maximum dose was set at 40 mg/day.
Other Names:
  • Prozac
  • Sarafem
  • Lovan
  • Fontex
  • Zactin
  • Fluohexal
  • Auscap
  • Depreks
  • Floxet
  • Flunil
  • Fluox
  • Fluzac
  • Fluxen
Streitberger's acupuncture needles will be applied on the same acupoints, with the same electrical stimulation parameters, except that the needles only adhere to the skin instead of insertion.
Other Names:
  • Strietberger®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HAMD-17
Time Frame: 42-day (course of treatment)
Depression symptoms is measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and once weekly thereafter.
42-day (course of treatment)
SDS
Time Frame: 42-day (course of treatment)
Depression symptoms is measured using the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Assessments will be conducted at baseline and once weekly thereafter.
42-day (course of treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PET scanning
Time Frame: 42-day (course of treatment)
The secondary outcome measure of high interest is the results of PET scanning. Two sessions of PET scan will be conducted at baseline and endpoint for enrolled subjects. An additional group of age- and gender-matched healthy subjects will be invited for one-session PET scan.
42-day (course of treatment)
Clinical response
Time Frame: 42-day (course of treatment)
Clinical response, defined as greater than or equal to 50% reduction at endpoint from baseline on HAMD-17, is measured at the baseline and once weekly thereafter.
42-day (course of treatment)
Remission
Time Frame: 42-day (course of treatment)
Remission, defined as 7 points or less on HAMD-17 score, is measured at the baseline and once weekly thereafter.
42-day (course of treatment)
Latency
Time Frame: 42-day (course of treatment)
The latency of the clinical response.
42-day (course of treatment)
Adverse events
Time Frame: 42-day (course of treatment)
Adverse events are assessed using the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) when applicable.
42-day (course of treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhang-Jin Zhang, MMed, PhD, School of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 28, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Fluoxetine

Subscribe