Improving Maternal and Child Health in India: Evaluating Demand and Supply Side Strategies (IMATCHINE) (IMATCHINE)

December 14, 2015 updated by: Duke University

Improving Maternal and Child Health in India: Evaluating Demand and Supply Side Strategies

The study evaluates the impact of a new conditional cash transfer (CCT) program (Thayi Bhagya Yojana) to promote child birth in obstetric facilities in the state of Karnataka, India in order to determine its policy value and to guide efforts to improve maternal and infant health outcomes nationally. In addition, the study includes a large randomized evaluation of performance-based incentive payments to providers to improve quality of medical care provided during delivery and actual health improvement in the providers' patient populations and their catchment areas.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The evaluation study will first provide new evidence on the effectiveness of demand-side strategies to increase institutional deliveries and improve childbirth outcomes. Second, the study will analyze one of the first implementations of direct rewards to providers for health improvement in a developing country. Third, the study will provide critical new insight into dynamics between demand and supply-side incentives in improving population health outcomes as either complements or substitutes.

The study uses household survey to collect data from mothers on socio-economic, human capital, quality of life variables (including below poverty line [BPL] index components) and as well as information about deliveries, fertility histories, morbidity and mortality (for mothers, infants, and children), birth related complications, health service use and spending. Additionally, provider surveys will collect data on infrastructure, staffing, provider qualifications, provider knowledge and process measures of provider performance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

14990

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Karnataka
      • Bangalore, Karnataka, India
        • Imatchine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Households with new mothers (one to three weeks after childbirth)
  • Rural private sector maternity care providers who are listed on the Karnataka government's legitimate provider list.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Households without children
  • Households where mothers gave birth > 3 weeks ago
  • Public sector maternity care providers
  • Private sector maternity care providers serving in towns with large public providers such as Community Health Centers (CHCs)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Mothers at endline
Data collected on new mothers (up to three weeks after childbirth) in 180 clusters with 100 mothers in each cluster at endline.
Experimental: Treatment 1
Data collected on new mothers (up to three weeks after childbirth) and on providers with incentives for clinical improvements in quality of maternity care in the providers' patient populations and the catchment areas served by the providers.
Physicians will receive financial incentives for improving the quality of obstetric and neonatal care provided to mothers and newborns as reported by mothers during household interviews.
Experimental: Treatment 2
Data collected on new mothers (up to three weeks after childbirth) and on providers with incentives for improvement in maternal and infant health outcomes in the providers' patient populations and in the catchment areas served by the providers.
Physicians will receive financial incentives for improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes as reported by mothers during household interviews.
No Intervention: Control
Data collected on new mothers (up to three weeks after childbirth) and providers with no incentives

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Increase institutional deliveries and improve maternal and infant health outcomes in the population.
Time Frame: 1 Year
Rates of deliveries in hospitals and maternal health complications such as obstetric fistulas, post-partum hemorrhage, sepsis, as well as neonatal outcomes.
1 Year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of financial incentives to maternity care private providers for improvements in the clinical quality of services in the providers' patient populations and the catchment areas they serve.
Time Frame: 1 Year
Indicators of quality of services include monitoring of the fetal heartbeat, active management of labor, and monitoring of cervical dilation and effacement.
1 Year
Effectiveness of financial incentives to maternity care private providers for improvements in maternal and infant health outcomes in the providers' patient populations and the catchment areas they serve.
Time Frame: 1 Year
Indicators of improvements in maternal and neonatal health outcomes include reduced incidence of maternal morbidity outcomes such as obstetric fistulas, excessive post partum bleeding, sepsis, hospital readmission, as well as neonatal outcomes.
1 Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 16, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Experimental: Treatment 1

3
Subscribe