Quantification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Detection of Prostate Cancer (AMC_2011_190)

July 4, 2016 updated by: Prof. dr. ir. H. Wijkstra, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

With Contrast Enhanced UltraSound (CEUS) cancer induced neovascularisation can be visualised with the potential to improve ultrasound imaging for prostate cancer detection and localisation significantly. The past years numerous studies have been performed with CEUS, all basing their results on subjective judgement of the investigator. CEUS image interpretation is difficult and requires a well-trained expert. To overcome these difficulties CEUS quantification techniques can be of use. The techniques used in this protocol have been developed in cooperation with the Technical University in Eindhoven (TU/e) and BRACCO, Geneva.

The investigators hypothesize improvement of the PCa detection rate with quantification, compared with subjective CEUS interpretation and known numbers in literature.

Also a comparison between quantification results and tumour differentiation grade (Gleason score) will be made, the investigators hypothesize a positive correlation.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

208

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • AMC University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Population:

All patients already scheduled for biopsy because of a raised Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) and/ or abnormal Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) in the Academic Medical Centre (AMC), excluding patients who do meet the exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria:

  • age ≥ 18 years
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

  • Has documented acute prostatitis or urinary tract infections.
  • History of any clinically unstable cardiac condition including class III/IV cardiac failure or right-to-left shunts.
  • Has had severe cardiac rhythm disorders within the last 7 days.
  • Has severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure >90 mmHg) or uncontrolled systemic hypertension or respiratory distress syndrome
  • Has received a biopsy procedure within 30 days before admission into this study
  • Has any medical condition or other circumstances which would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completing the study.
  • Is incapable of understanding the language in which the information for the patient is given.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: SonoVue
Ultrasound Contrast Agent
2.4 ml Bolus Injection by intravenous canule. Multi-repeatable (up to 4 bolus) if necessary.
Other Names:
  • SonoVue sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles 8 microlitres/ml
  • Powder and solvent for dispersion for injection.
  • MARKETING AUTHORISATION NUMBER(S): EU/1/01/177/002

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantification prediction compared with prostate biopsy histology
Time Frame: 3 years

Prostate cancer detection rate by quantification.

Answering the question: What is the difference in, for malignancy suspicious, areas between CEUS quantification and subjective interpretation in relation to the histological biopsy results?

3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantification prediction compared with prostate biopsy histology
Time Frame: 3 years

Prostate cancer Gleason score compared to quantification results

Answering the question: Is there a relation between Gleason score and quantification results?

3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: H. Wijkstra, Prof. Dr. Ir., AMC University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on SonoVue

Subscribe