- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01486615
Premedication With Melatonin and Alprazolam Combination Versus Alprazolam or Melatonin Alone
Premedication With Melatonin and Alprazolam Combination Versus Alprazolam or Melatonin Alone: a Randomized, Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study
Background: Benzodiazepine, a common premedicant, suppresses endogenous melatonin levels and thus paradoxically increases episodes of arousal during sleep and thus causes restlessness and hangs over effects. Adding melatonin to it may decrease nocturnal arousal and promote the perception of sound sleep in the perioperative period.
Methods: Eighty patients (ASA 1&2) with anxiety VAS ≥ 2 posted for general anaesthesia will be randomly assigned to receive 0.5 mg alprazolam (Group A), 3 mg melatonin, a combination of 0.5 mg alprazolam and 3 mg melatonin (Group AM), or a similar looking placebo (Group P), approximately 90 minutes before surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Review of literature:
Benzodiazepines are among the most popular drugs used for preoperative medication to produce anxiolysis, amnesia, and sedation. However, they negatively influence sleep quality by decreasing the duration of REM sleep and slow wave sleep.
Alprazolam is more anxioselective than the more commonly used ones like midazolam, lorazepam and diazepam.Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) is an emerging premedicant as it possesses anxiolytic and sedative properties without impairing cognitive or psychomotor skills.5 Moreover, it has an excellent safety profile.
We designed this prospective randomized double blind placebo controlled study to assess whether addition of melatonin to alprazolam has any benefit over alprazolam, melatonin or placebo alone as a premedication agent.
Rationale of the study Melatonin facilitates sleep onset and improves the quality of sleep. On the other hand, benzodiazepines suppress endogenous melatonin levels and thus paradoxically increase episodes of arousal during sleep causing restlessness and hang over effects (fatigue).
Hence, the rationale of using melatonin alprazolam combination is melatonin may decrease nocturnal arousal and promote the perception of sound sleep and thus reverse this unwanted side effect of alprazolam. Melatonin does not produce amnesia and adding a benzodiazepine to it may be desirable to achieve this desirable premedication effect.
Research design and methodology:
After getting approval from the institutional research ethics committee and written informed consent, we will study eighty patients. With the help of computer generated random numbers, patients will be assigned to one of the four groups (n=20) to receive vitamin B (Group P), 0.5 mg alprazolam (Group A), 3mg melatonin (Group M) or a combination of 0.5 mg alprazolam and 3 mg melatonin (Group AM) approximately 90 minutes before surgery. In addition to the study drugs, Groups A and AM will also receive vitamin B.
On the preanaesthetic visit one day prior to surgery, the patients will be explained about the nature of the study and the various scales to be used. A 10 cm linear Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as well as Nepali version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) will be used to assess their anxiety level. The extremes of the VAS anxiety scale will be marked as 'no anxiety' at the 0 end and 'anxiety as bad as ever can be' at the 10 cm end. Sedation will be assessed with a 5 point scale (0=alert, 1=arouses to voice, 2=arouses with gentle tactile stimulation, 3=arouses with vigorous tactile stimulation, 4=lack of responsiveness) and orientation, with a 3 point scale (0=none, 1=orientation in either time or place, 2=orientation in both). To test for the memory, recall of 5 different simple pictures and 2 events will be assessed. Pictures to be used will be sequentially numbered on the back and their names printed on the front.
Approximately 2 hours prior to surgery, each patient will be taken to a quiet room. Non invasive blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and SpO2 will be monitored. Then picture 1 (cup on a plate) and 2 (fruits) will be shown at 10 min before and just prior to the drug administration respectively. Patients will be asked to take the study medication orally with 15 ml of plain water according to the group assignment by an investigator not involved in the patient management and data collection thereafter. Then anxiety, sedation and orientation will be assessed at 15 min, 30 min and 1 hour after the drug administration. At these time points pictures 3 (bird), 4 (hare) and 5 (car) will also be shown respectively.
In the operating room, intravenous access will be secured and pethidine 1 mg/kg administered. Then intravenous lidocaine 20 mg bolus will be administered followed by propofol with infusion pump at 100 ml per hour till responses to verbal command and eyelash reflex are lost. Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg and isoflurane in oxygen will be administered to maintain the adequate depth of anaesthesia. After intubation, ventilation will be adjusted to maintain normocapnia. Incremental doses of pethidine and vecuronium will be administered as needed on the discretion of the investigator blinded to the patient's group assignment. No other analgesics will be administered. After completion of surgery, intravenous neostigmine 50 microgram/kg and glycopyrrolate 10 microgram/kg will be given to reverse muscle paralysis. Anaesthesia time (induction to emergence) will be noted.
In the recovery room, patients will receive the standard postoperative care; including oxygen administration via face mask 6 L/min and monitoring of heart rate, respiratory rate, non invasive blood pressure and SpO2. Modified Aldrete score and sedation score will be assessed at 10 min and 30 min after extubation. Also the occurrence of nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache and restlessness will be recorded till 24 hours. Vomiting will be managed with ondansetron 4 mg intravenously.
The next day, the patients will be asked if they recalled the two events; being transported to operating room and intravenous cannula being inserted. They will also be asked to have a free recall of the five pictures they were shown and the score will represent the numbers of pictures they recalled. Then the first five pictures that they were shown will be mixed with next 5 new pictures (of a horse, shoe, bicycle, elephant and tiger) and they will be asked to recognize those they had already seen. The score will represent the number of pictures correctly identified. They will also be asked whether they felt that premedication drug is required to relieve anxiety and also whether they would like to receive the same premedication drug in the future.
Statistical analysis: Data will be tested for normal distribution using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To identify differences between groups, one-way ANOVA will be used for normally distributed continuing data and chi square tests for categorical data. If the data is found to be not normally distributed; they will be analyzed with nonparametric statistical methods. Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance followed by Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction will be used for within-group comparison of values between different time points. Kruskal Wallis tests with post hoc multiple comparisons by Mann Whitney U test will be used for the comparison of values between the groups at each time points. Parametric data will be expressed as the mean±SD and nonparametric data as median (interquartile range). A p value <0.05 will be considered significant.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Koshi
-
Dharan, Koshi, Nepal, 56700
- B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
-
Dharan, Koshi, Nepal, 56700
- Dr Krishna Pokharel
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- (ASA 1&2),
- aging 18 to 65 years
- having anxiety VAS score of more than 2
- posted for general anaesthesia with estimated duration of < 3 hours.
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients taking analgesics, sedatives, antiepileptics or antidepressants,
- suffering from obesity (BMI ≥ 28) or neuropsychiatric disease,
- having allergy to the study drugs
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Melatonin
Premedication with 3 mg melatonin (Meloset) tablet orally 1-2 hour prior to anesthesia
|
3 mg melatonin tablet 1-2 hour prior surgery
|
|
Placebo Comparator: melatonin and alprazolam premedication
Premedication with 3 mg melatonin and 0.5 mg alprazolam (Stresnil) tablet orally 1-2 hrs prior to anesthesia
|
3 mg melatonin and 0.5 mg alprazolam 1-2 hr before anesthesia
|
|
Placebo Comparator: alprazolam premedication
Premedication with 0.5 mg alprazolam (Alprax) tablet orally 1-2 hr prior to anesthesia
|
0.5 mg alprazolam
|
|
Active Comparator: placebo premedication
Premedication with a similar looking placebo tablet orally 1-2 hr prior to anesthesia
|
similar looking placebo tablet
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline After Premedication
Time Frame: Change from baseline in VAS anxiety score at 15 minutes after premedication
|
VAS (Visual Analogue Score) Anxiety Scale is a 10 cm long scale with two sides, the patient side (front) and the clinicians side (back).
The extremes of the front are colored as white and black with a gradual darkening of color from white to black.
The back is marked in centimeter from 0 to 10 and 0 correlates with white color (no anxiety at all) and 10 correlates to black color (anxiety as bad as ever can be) on the front.
As anxiety is worsened, the color is darker and score is more.
The maximum score is 10 and minimum 0. The patient is asked to point on the scale according to his anxiety level.
The anxiety score is the correlating number on the clinicians side.
The more the reduction in anxiety from baseline, the better the outcome.
|
Change from baseline in VAS anxiety score at 15 minutes after premedication
|
|
Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline at 30 Minutes After Premedication
Time Frame: Changes from baseline in VAS anxiety score at 30 minutes after premedication
|
VAS (Visual Analogue Score) Anxiety Scale is a 10 cm long scale with two sides, the patient side (front) and the clinicians side (back).
The extremes of the front are colored as white and black with a gradual darkening of color from white to black.
The back is marked in centimeter from 0 to 10 and 0 correlates with white color (no anxiety at all) and 10 correlates to black color (anxiety as bad as ever can be) on the front.
As anxiety is worsened, the color is darker and score is more.
The maximum score is 10 and minimum 0. The patient is asked to point on the scale according to his anxiety level.
The anxiety score is the correlating number on the clinicians side.
The more the reduction in anxiety from baseline, the better the outcome.
|
Changes from baseline in VAS anxiety score at 30 minutes after premedication
|
|
Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline at One Hour After Premedication
Time Frame: Changes from baseline in VAS anxiety score at one hour after premedication
|
VAS (Visual Analogue Score) Anxiety Scale is a 10 cm long scale with two sides, the patient side (front) and the clinicians side (back).
The extremes of the front are colored as white and black with a gradual darkening of color from white to black.
The back is marked in centimeter from 0 to 10 and 0 correlates with white color (no anxiety at all) and 10 correlates to black color (anxiety as bad as ever can be) on the front.
As anxiety is worsened, the color is darker and score is more.
The maximum score is 10 and minimum 0. The patient is asked to point on the scale according to his anxiety level.
The anxiety score is the correlating number on the clinicians side.
The more the reduction in anxiety from baseline, the better the outcome.
|
Changes from baseline in VAS anxiety score at one hour after premedication
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sedation Score at One Hour After Premedication
Time Frame: Sedation score at 1 hour after the premedication
|
Sedation level was assessed with a 5 point scale (0=alert, 1=arouses to voice, 2=arouses with gentle tactile stimulation, 3=arouses with vigorous tactile stimulation, 4=lack of responsiveness).
Minimum score is 0 and Maximum is 4. The lesser the score, the better the outcome.
|
Sedation score at 1 hour after the premedication
|
|
Orientation Score
Time Frame: Orientation score at one hour after premedication
|
Orientation was assessed with a 3 point scale (0=none, 1=orientation in either time or place, 2=orientation in both).
Minimum score is 0 and maximum is 2. The lesser the score, the lesser the effect on patients cognition and the better the outcome.
|
Orientation score at one hour after premedication
|
|
Number of Patients With Intact Memory
Time Frame: 24 hour after surgery
|
Number of patients who recalled or recognized the picture number five shown one hour after premedication.
The more the number of patients with intact memory, the better the outcome.
|
24 hour after surgery
|
|
Amount of Propofol Consumption
Time Frame: 1 - 2 hour after premedication
|
Dose of propofol needed for loss of response to verbal command was noted at the time of induction of general anesthesia.
The lesser the propofol needed for the loss of response to verbal command, the better the outcome.
|
1 - 2 hour after premedication
|
|
Number of Patients With Loss of Memory for Being Transferred to Operating Room.
Time Frame: 24 hour after surgery
|
Patients were asked whether they recalled the event of being transferred to the operating room before anaesthesia.
The lesser the number of patients with amnesia, the better the outcome.
|
24 hour after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Krishna Pokharel, MD, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
- Study Director: Balkrishna Bhattarai, MD, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Naguib M, Samarkandi AH, Moniem MA, Mansour Eel-D, Alshaer AA, Al-Ayyaf HA, Fadin A, Alharby SW. The effects of melatonin premedication on propofol and thiopental induction dose-response curves: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2006 Dec;103(6):1448-52. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000244534.24216.3a.
- Naguib M, Samarkandi AH. The comparative dose-response effects of melatonin and midazolam for premedication of adult patients: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2000 Aug;91(2):473-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200008000-00046.
- Naguib M, Samarkandi AH. Premedication with melatonin: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with midazolam. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Jun;82(6):875-80. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.6.875.
- De Witte JL, Alegret C, Sessler DI, Cammu G. Preoperative alprazolam reduces anxiety in ambulatory surgery patients: a comparison with oral midazolam. Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1601-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00024.
- Seabra ML, Bignotto M, Pinto LR Jr, Tufik S. Randomized, double-blind clinical trial, controlled with placebo, of the toxicology of chronic melatonin treatment. J Pineal Res. 2000 Nov;29(4):193-200. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0633.2002.290401.x.
- Wade AG, Ford I, Crawford G, McMahon AD, Nir T, Laudon M, Zisapel N. Efficacy of prolonged release melatonin in insomnia patients aged 55-80 years: quality of sleep and next-day alertness outcomes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Oct;23(10):2597-605. doi: 10.1185/030079907X233098.
- Wurtman RJ, Zhdanova I. Improvement of sleep quality by melatonin. Lancet. 1995 Dec 2;346(8988):1491. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92509-0. No abstract available.
- Pokharel K, Tripathi M, Gupta PK, Bhattarai B, Khatiwada S, Subedi A. Premedication with oral alprazolam and melatonin combination: a comparison with either alone--a randomized controlled factorial trial. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:356964. doi: 10.1155/2014/356964. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Protective Agents
- Antipsychotic Agents
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Dopamine Agents
- Dopamine Antagonists
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- GABA Modulators
- GABA Agents
- Antioxidants
- Melatonin
- Alprazolam
- Azaperone
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2/18 (Acd. 796/067/068)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.