Routine Follow-up Versus Self-assessment in Medical Abortion

August 6, 2013 updated by: Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, Karolinska Institutet

Routine Follow-up Versus Self-assessment of Complete Abortion Following Medical Abortion, Effect on Its Success and Acceptability: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The main objective of the study is to optimize the routines for follow-up after medical abortion in order to give women more autonomy by reducing the number of consultations involved and to reduce the frequency of postabortal curettage.

This will be achieved by providing means for women for postabortal self-assessment with the use of a quantitative urinary hCG test.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

929

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria
        • GynMed Clinic
      • Helsinki, Finland
        • Dept. Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Helsinki University Central Hospital
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Dept. of Gynaecology,
      • Stockholm, Sweden, SE17176
        • Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women requesting termination of pregnancy by means of mifepristone followed by home administration of misoprostol at < /=63 days of gestation, with no contraindication to medical abortion and self administration of misoprostol at home, and who have given their informed consent will be eligible for study recruitment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women who do not wish to participate
  • women who do not want home administration of misoprostol
  • women who are unable to communicate in Swedish, Norwegian, English, Finnish or German and women with symptoms and signs of ectopic pregnancy
  • minors (i.e. women < 18 years of age) will not be enrolled for the study.
  • women seeking termination of pregnancy with no sign of a visible intrauterine pregnancy (i.e. visible intrauterine yolk sac).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Controls
Routine follow-up at the clinic 2-3 weeks after the treatment
Other: Home self test
Intervention
Self assessment of complete abortion using a home semiquantitative U-hCG test. Follow-up out patient review two-three weeks later by qualified practitioner to evaluate success of procedure using the clinic's standard routine. The patient charts will be reviewed after three months in order to control for possible extra visits related to abortion-related complications.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of complete abortions
Time Frame: Until 3 months post treatment
The primary objective is thus to demonstrate the non-inferiority of self-assessment of complete abortion following medical abortion compared to routine follow-up in terms of the percentage of women requiring surgical abortion, within a margin of non-inferiority of 5%.
Until 3 months post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postabortion contraception
Time Frame: until 12 months post treatment
The use of contraception and rate of repeat abortion at follow-up questionnaire at one year.
until 12 months post treatment
adverse events
Time Frame: util 3 months post treatment
Number of women reporting adverse events and side effects including infections, bleeding, pain
util 3 months post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 7, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medical Abortion

Clinical Trials on Home self assessment of complete medical abortion

Subscribe