- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01498991
Spinal Cord Injury Leg Rehabilitation (AMES)
Rehabilitation of the Lower Extremity With AMES Following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
The purpose of this study is to determine if individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) who remain unable to walk normally 1 year after their SCIs are able to sense and move the affected legs better after 10-13 weeks of treatment with a new robotic therapy device.
The hypothesis is that using the AMES device on the legs of chronic subjects with incomplete SCI will result in improved strength, sensation in the legs, and improved functional gait in the treated limbs.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) affects over 200,000 people in the USA, with several thousand new injuries each year. Most recovery, following SCI, occurs in the six months following surgery. Further recovery after 12 months is unusual.
In this study 10 subjects, more than 1 year post injury, will be enrolled to test the safety and efficacy of a new type of robotic therapy device known as the AMES device. The aim of this Phase I/II study is to investigate the use of assisted movement and enhanced sensation (AMES) technology in the rehabilitation of the legs of participants with incomplete SCI.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
- Shepherd Center, Crawford Research Center
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Oregon Health and Science University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Paraplegia or tetraplegia due to SCI
- At least 1 year post incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
- Can tolerate sitting upright for at least one hour
- Capable of weight-bearing and taking a step with or without an assistive device
- On the ASIA sensory function (light touch), a score of at least 1 at the L4 and L5 level
- Primary ASIA Motor Criterion (PAMC) a total score of 4-12 for hip extensors, knee extensors, ankle dorsiflexors and ankle plantarflexors, with a minimum score of 1 for each of these muscles in the qualifying leg
Exclusion Criteria:
- Fracture of the treated limb resulting in loss of range of motion
- Concomitant TBI or stroke (Patients who sustained mild head injury during the trauma with no evidence of structural abnormalities on brain images will qualify for the study), or other neurological injury or disease
- DVT of the treated extremity
- Peripheral nerve injury of the treated extremity
- Osteo- or rheumatoid-arthritis limiting range of motion
- Contractures equal to or greater than 50% of the normal ROM
- Skin condition not tolerant of device or sitting upright
- Progressive neurodegenerative disorder
- Botox treatment of the treated extremity in the prior 5 month
- Chronic ITB therapy
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder
- Uncontrolled high blood pressure/angina
- Pain in affected limb or exercise intolerance
- Participation in another therapy or activity-based program
- Combined score on ASIA motor function for knee extensors, ankle dorsiflexors and ankle plantarflexors outside the range of 3-9
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: AMES Treatment
The subject will receive 30 treatment sessions, conducted 3-4 times per week on the AMES device.
Each session will consist of testing followed by 40 minutes of treatment time (20 minutes per each leg) using the AMES device.
|
The AMES device rotates the ankle over a range of 30 degrees while vibrators stimulate the tendons attached to muscles that move the leg.
Each participant will receive treatment of both lower extremities.
Treatment of the 2 legs will be scheduled to run in the same session.
The subject's task is to assist the motion of the device.
The AMES treatment device couples assisted movement and tendon vibration (enhanced sensation) in 30 treatments which will each run approximately 40 minutes (20 minutes on the right leg and 20 minutes on the left leg).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Gait Velocity
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
Measured by the GAITRite system
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Vibration Threshold Test
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
|
Timed 10-Meter Walk Test
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
|
Gait Assessment Including Step Length and Cadence
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
Measured by the GAITRite system
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
Ankle Active Motion Test
Time Frame: Prior to each treatment session, on average 3 times a week
|
The participants will perform an active range-of-motion (ROM) task each time they are treated with the AMES device, in which they move the affected joint to several target joint angles, guided by visual feedback on a display screen on the AMES device.
|
Prior to each treatment session, on average 3 times a week
|
Ankle Strength
Time Frame: Prior to each treatment session, on average 3 times a week
|
The AMES device will test the affected ankle in each direction for maximum strength of voluntary contraction .
|
Prior to each treatment session, on average 3 times a week
|
ASIA Motor and Sensory Scores for L2-S1
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Post-Treatment change from Baseline ( average 13 weeks), 3 months following completion of treatments (average 26 weeks from Baseline).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Paul J Cordo, PhD, Oregon Health and Science University
- Principal Investigator: Andrew Nemecek, MD, Oregon Health and Science University
- Principal Investigator: Deborah Backus, PT, PhD, Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00007762
- R01NS061304-22 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanThe Industrial Technology Research InstituteUnknownSpinal Cord Injuries | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryTaiwan
-
University of FloridaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingSCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
Jill M. Wecht, Ed.D.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruitingBlood Pressure | Spinal Cord Injuries | SCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Blood Pressure Disorders | Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury | Acute Spinal Cord Injury | Neuromodulation | Spinal Cord StimulationUnited States
-
NervGen PharmaRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Chronic Spinal Cord Injury | Subacute Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
MetroHealth Medical CenterNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western...RecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury CervicalUnited States
-
Kevin KilgoreNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury Cervical | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Complete Lesion | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Incomplete LesionUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...TerminatedSpinal Cord Injuries | Cervical Spinal Cord Injury | Traumatic Spinal Cord CompressionUnited States
-
StemCells, Inc.TerminatedStudy of Human Central Nervous System (CNS) Stem Cell Transplantation in Cervical Spinal Cord InjuryCervical Spinal Cord Injury | Spine Injury | Cervical Spine InjuryUnited States, Canada
-
S.Biomedics Co., Ltd.Yonsei University; Linical Co., Ltd.RecruitingSpinal Cord Injury, Acute | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Complete Lesion | Spinal Cord Injury at C4 Level With Complete LesionKorea, Republic of
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryThailand
Clinical Trials on AMES Treatment
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityShepherd Center, Atlanta GACompletedParesis | Spinal Cord Injury | Tetraplegia | PlegiaUnited States
-
AMES TechnologyNorthwestern University; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke... and other collaboratorsUnknownStroke | Hemiparesis | Cerebrovascular AccidentUnited States
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityTerminatedStroke | Acquired Brain Injury | Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
University of ArkansasAMES TechnologyWithdrawnHealthy Elderly | Fall RiskUnited States
-
AMES TechnologyNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)Unknown
-
AMES TechnologyEmory University; University of California, San Francisco; Shirley Ryan AbilityLab and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
AMES TechnologyNorthwestern University; Emory University; Oregon Health and Science UniversityCompletedStroke | Paresis | Cerebrovascular Accident | PlegiaUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaVancouver General HospitalUnknown
-
PfizerCompleted
-
PfizerCompleted