A Community Partnership to Treat Stroke

August 4, 2017 updated by: Lesli E. Skolarus, MD, University of Michigan
Getting to the hospital quickly is the key to treating stroke. African Americans suffer more strokes with worse outcomes and receive stroke treatments less often than European Americans. This project will work to reduce these health disparities by creating and testing the feasibility of a peer-led faith-based behavioral intervention in an African American community with a goal to increase calls to 911 so stroke patients can be treated quickly.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

To meet participant eligibility criteria, individuals must be 18 years of age or older (adult intervention) or between 10-17 years of age (youth intervention), a resident of the Flint or greater Flint community, and English speaking.

Exclusion Criteria:

We will attempt to exclude those who cannot read English because they will not be able to benefit from the intervention materials. These criteria will be confirmed during assessment procedures prior to enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stroke preparedness intervention
Youth and adults from predominately African American churches in Flint will be enrolled to undergo a faith-based, scientific theory-driven, peer-led behavioral intervention utilizing a pre-post test design.
A faith-based, scientific theory-driven, peer-led behavioral intervention performed in a group setting in African American churches.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Completion
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of participants who complete the intervention
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Behavioral Intent to Call 911
Time Frame: 1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop
The pre-test is conducted one week prior to the post-test. A higher score indicates greater behavioral intent. Behavioral intent is measured on a scale of 0 - 8, where 0 indicates no correct answers in responses to scenarios, and 8 indicates appropriate responses (calling 911 every time it is appropriate) to the scenarios presented.
1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop
Mean Change in Stroke Recognition
Time Frame: 1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop
Stroke recognition was scored on a 0 - 9 point scale where 0 represents no correct answers regarding 9 scenarios and 9 represents perfect stroke recognition.
1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop
Perception of Social Norms Clustered Within Churches Across Multiple Time Points
Time Frame: 1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test
Perception of social norms is measured by the odds ratio of the responses to questions of participant agreement with others' influence to calling 911 if he/she were to see a stroke. Odds ratios measure the odds of responses, so higher odds ratios suggest greater odds of the positive change in social norms in the post-test compared to the pre-test. Questions: 1) Most people would call 911 if they were to see a stroke. 2) My family would want me to call 911 if I were to see a stroke. Given that participants within each church are more alike than participants between churches and the multiple time points, hierarchical models were used. Specifically, multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression models with a fixed church-level intercept and a random participant level intercept were used to explore change between baseline and immediate post-test and baseline and delayed post-test social norms after accounting for the participants' church.
1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test
Perception of Self-efficacy Clustered Within Churches Across Multiple Time Points
Time Frame: 1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test
Perception of self-efficacy is measured by the odds ratios of the responses to questions of participant confidence in being able to identify and respond appropriately to a stroke. Odds ratios measure the odds of responses, so higher odds ratios suggest greater odds of positive self-efficacy change in the post-test compared to the pretest. Questions asking about self-efficacy were:1) I would be able to tell if someone is having a stroke and 2) I know what to do if I saw someone having a stroke. Given that participants within each church are more alike than participants between churches and multiple time points hierarchical models were used. Specifically, multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression models with a fixed church-level intercept and a random participant level intercept were used to explore change between baseline and immediate post-test and baseline and delayed posttest self-efficacy after accounting for the participants' church.
1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test
Perception of Stroke Attitude Clustered Within Churches Across Multiple Time Points
Time Frame: 1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test
Stroke attitude is measured by the odds ratio of participant's positive perception of calling 911 for stroke. Odds ratios measure the odds of responses, so higher odds ratios suggest greater odds of stroke attitude change in the post-test compared to pre-test. Stroke attitude questioners were: Q1) If I were to see signs of a stroke, calling 911 would be... (range "extremely pleasant" to "very unpleasant); and Q2) If a person has signs of a stroke, calling 911 right away could be... (range "very helpful" to "very harmful). Given that participants within each church are more alike than participants between churches and multiple time points, hierarchical models were used. Specifically, multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression models with a fixed church-level intercept and a random participant level intercept were used to explore change between baseline and immediate post-test and baseline and delayed post-test stroke attitude after accounting for the participants' church.
1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Program Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop
Program satisfaction is measured by percentage of participants that completed the program who answered on the post test: very satisfied or extremely satisfied on a questionnaire about the program.
1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 26, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GRANT10624910
  • 1K23NS073685-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Stroke Preparedness Intervention

Subscribe