Lidocaine Spray Compared With Submucosal Injection During LEEP: a Randomized Controlled Trial

January 13, 2013 updated by: Kittipat Charoenkwan, M.D., Chiang Mai University

Lidocaine Spray Compared With Submucosal Injection in Reducing Pain During Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) is a widely used minor surgical procedure for diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. During the procedure, several methods have been proposed to reducing pain including submucosal block, paracervical block, and oral analgesics. Submucosal (underneath the lining of the cervix) injection of lidocaine appeared to be the most common methods used. However, from the investigators experience, there is significant pain associated with the injection itself.

Lidocaine spray is an effective measure for pain control during minor gastrointestinal and otolaryngological procedures. It is simple without pain related to application.

An objective of this study is to examine effectiveness of lidocaine spray versus lidocaine submucosal injection by comparing pain scores at various stages of the LEEP procedure.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200
        • Department of OB-GYN, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any degrees of cervical dysplasia detected from cervical cytology or histology
  • Need to have loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for diagnosis and/or treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to lidocaine
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous history of cervical operation including conization, LEEP, laser therapy and cryotherapy
  • Cardiac arrhythmia
  • Neural disease with impaired sensation
  • Lower urinary tract cancer
  • Coagulation defect
  • Drug dependence
  • Lower genital tract infection
  • Obvious invasive disease of the cervix

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lidocaine spray
10% lidocaine spray 40 mg applied directly to the cervix, 3 minutes before starting cervical excision
10% lidocaine spray 40 mg applied directly to the cervix, 3 minutes before starting cervical excision
Active Comparator: Lidocaine submucosal injection
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline 2 ml injected submucosally to the four quadrant of the cervix, 3 minutes before starting cervical excision
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline 2 ml injected submucosally into the four quadrant of the cervix, 3 minutes before starting cervical excision

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Visual analog pain scores immediately after the excision
Time Frame: Immediately after the excision
Immediately after the excision

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Visual analog pain scores at the time of anesthetic application
Time Frame: At the time of anesthetic application
At the time of anesthetic application
Visual analog pain scores at 30 minutes after the procedure
Time Frame: At 30 minutes after the procedure
At 30 minutes after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kittipat Charoenkwan, M.D., Chiang Mai University
  • Principal Investigator: Asama Vanichtantikul, M.D., Chiang Mai University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

January 9, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 15, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine spray

Subscribe