- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01508624
Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Pain Relief, Perceived Anxiety and Recovery in Participants Receiving Office Based Surgery
Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase Pain Relief, Perceived Anxiety and Recovery in Participants Receiving Office Based Surgery
This research will evaluate the impact of interventions to improve pain relief and recovery following office based surgery.
There will be three phases to this research. The first phase will focus on predicting recovery from office based vein surgery using a multiple regression analysis.
Phase two will incorporate a randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of a range of interventions in anxiety and pain reduction and recovery for office based vein surgery patients.
The final phase of the investigation will utilise qualitative methodology to explore patients' experiences of each intervention and their opinions about what was and was not effective.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In recent years there has been a large increase in the amount of surgical procedures now available on an outpatient basis (Gilmartin & Wright, 2008). This is due largely to advances in surgical methods and also in response to increasing demands on the National Health Service (M. Mitchell, 2010). This shift impacts patients and health care professionals alike who must adapt to home based recovery and symptom management (Stomberg, Segerdahl, Rawal, Jakobsson, & Brattwall, 2008). This research will investigate patient's expectations, experiences, recovery and satisfaction with office based surgery conducted in a private clinic.
The advancement of office based surgery has led to a rise in the number of procedures completed under local rather than general anaesthetic (Chukmaitov, Devers, Harless, Menachemi, & Brooks, 2011). Resultantly, the number of patients who are conscious during surgery has risen. The environment of the operating theatre must now be considered and nurses are become increasingly responsible for patient's mental wellbeing during surgery. For some, the prospect of being conscious during surgery can be stressful and a number of individual factors have been identified as potentially anxiety provoking (Mitchell, 2009). These range from waiting in the clinic before the surgery (Mitchell, 2008) hearing sounds of instruments being unpacked (Hankela & Kiikkala, 1996) to fears over anaesthesia (Bondy, Sims, Schroeder, Offord, & Narr). Patients' anxiety levels have been found to be high in the pre operative period (Kagan & Bar-Tal, 2008) and the links between high pre operative anxiety and poorer surgical outcomes have been well documented (Dodds 1993,Munafò & Stevenson, 2001).
With this in mind, methods of reducing patient anxiety have been explored. Adapting the operating environment to better suit the needs of the patient has been found to be effective in anxiety reduction (Mark Mitchell, 2008). A powerful yet simple factor in anxiety reduction is the behaviour of the nursing staff in the operating theatre. When nurses use comforting words or touch, anxiety reductions have been observed during and before surgery (Cox & Hayes, 1997.) There is also some evidence to suggest that therapeutic touch can reduce surgical pain(Ramnarine-Singh, 1999). Other easily achievable adaptations to the operating environment that have been shown to have great anti anxiolytic effects include music (Cooke, Chaboyer, & Hiratos, 2005), audio- visual stimuli (Drahota et al., 2008), virtual reality (Hoffman et al, 2001) and massage (Kim, Cho, Woo, & Kim, 2001).
The research above outlines how the addition of fairly minor interventions can be effective in improving patient's experience of office based surgery. As the growth of day surgery continues, identifying and implementing the most effective interventions for anxiety and pain reduction grows ever more important.
In light of the research outlined above, this investigation will utilise a three phase approach t evaluate interventions aimed at improving pain relief and recovery following office based surgery.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Guildford, United Kingdom, GU2 7RF
- The Whiteley Clinic
-
Guildford, United Kingdom, GU2 7XH
- The University of Surrey
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants will need to meet the following inclusion criteria to take part in this research:
- To be aged over 18,
- To have given informed consent,
- To have a good understanding of written and spoken english,
- To be receiving EVLA or phlebectomies for varicose veins
Exclusion Criteria:
The following exclusion criteria will be applied:
- If participants do not wish to take part due to randomisation or intervention procedures
- If they have a poor understanding of written and spoken english,
- If they are younger than 18 years of age, or older than 80
- The presence of leg ulcers
- If they are having foam treatments for thread veins
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
participants will receive standard usual care
|
|
|
Experimental: Interaction
Participants will interact with nurses during their procedure
|
Participants in this condition will interact with nurses during their surgery.
The nurses will not touch the patient's hand during treatment as this intervention looks at interaction with another person, in the absence of tactile stimuli.
|
|
Experimental: Music
Participants will listen to music using head phones during their procedure.
|
Participants will be offered a choice of music to listen to from a selection at the clinic, they will also have the opportunity of bringing or selecting their own music which can be streamed from the internet.
They will listen to the music through headphones
|
|
Experimental: Touch - stress balls
Participants will be provided with stress balls to use during their procedure
|
Participants will be provided with two stress balls which they will be encouraged to squeeze during their surgery and administration of the local anaesthetic
|
|
Experimental: DVD
Participants will watch a DVD during their procedure and will listen to the accompanying audio through head phones
|
participants will be given a choice of DVDs to watch during their procedure.
A wall mounted screen will be positioned so that participants can comfortably view the screen during their procedure.
they will listen to the accompanying audio through wireless headphones.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Level of pain experienced at the time of surgery
Time Frame: Immediately after surgery, in the recovery area participants will complete a brief measure of pain (The McGill Pain Questionnaire) up to day 1
|
Measured by the McGill Pain Questionnaire
|
Immediately after surgery, in the recovery area participants will complete a brief measure of pain (The McGill Pain Questionnaire) up to day 1
|
|
Change in pain experienced from time of surgery to 8 weeks after surgery
Time Frame: 8 weeks after date of surgery
|
Measured by the McGill Pain Questionnaire
|
8 weeks after date of surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recovery
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
return to pre surgical functioning, satisfaction with treatment, quality of life, symptom severity,
|
8 weeks
|
|
Anxiety
Time Frame: Immediatley after surgery
|
Participants will complete the state scale of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory in the waiting area immediately after surgery to indicate how anxious they felt during their procedure.
|
Immediatley after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Briony Hudson, University of Surrey
- Study Chair: Jane Ogden, University of Surrey
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 6045559US
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg PainUnited States
-
Qi's ClinicNot yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, SplittingUnited States, France, Spain, Poland, Portugal
-
susanne beckerSNSFCompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, ChronicSwitzerland
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
Clinical Trials on Interaction
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedFibromyalgiaUnited States
-
Penn State UniversityNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)RecruitingAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)United States
-
Reuth Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of HaifaTerminatedHemiparesis;Poststroke/CVAIsrael
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityPurina Mills, IncCompletedThe Role of Therapy Dogs in Reducing Depression, Anxiety, and Loneliness Among Hospitalized ChildrenHospitalized ChildrenUnited States
-
SpeechVive, IncPurdue UniversityCompletedParkinson DiseaseUnited States
-
Beacon Hill AcademyAnglia Ruskin University; The Music Therapy Charity LtdWithdrawnChild Development Disorders, Specific | Developmental Communication DisordersUnited Kingdom
-
Penn State UniversityRecruitingAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierEuromov Digital Health in MotionRecruiting
-
Boston Medical CenterStanford University; Northeastern UniversityCompleted