- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01513447
Intracutaneous Sterile Water Injections
Intracutaneous Sterile Water Injection as an Adjunct to Neuraxial Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
For most women, the most significant pain they will experience is the pain associated with childbirth. Up to one-third of women experience "back labor", this typically occurs when the fetus assumes varying degrees of malposition, especially the occiput posterior position, and causes additional constant pressure against the maternal spine and pelvis. "Back labor" presents as constant pain, that occurs even between contractions. It is often difficult to manage, by the patient, the obstetrician, and the anesthesiologist, and may increase the rate of instrumental and caesarian delivery.
Epidural anesthesia/analgesia is the most common and effective intervention used to help women cope with labor pain. Dilute concentrations of local anesthetic and opioid provide complete analgesia for most women. Some women, however, have breakthrough pain, often due to "back labor," and require more concentrated drug solutions. This increases the side effects associated with these drugs (e.g., hypotension, pruritus, motor block), thus treatment of this pain poses a challenge for the anesthesiologist and the obstetrician.
Sterile water injections (SWI) are a simple and well-established method of managing labor pain among midwives. This intervention was first used to alleviate pain associated with kidney stones, and was introduced to obstetrics in the 1970s. Using a syringe, small amounts of sterile water is deposited subcutaneously near the sacral area. The sterile water causes osmotic and mechanical irritation resulting in a brief (15-30 second) and significant stinging sensation. The onset of pain relief follows almost immediately and may last for up to two hours. The procedure can be repeated a number of times.
Sterile water for pain management is most often administered using four intracutaneous injections: two sites lateral to the lumbosacral spine and two sites 2-3 cm below and 1-2 cm medial to the original two injection sites. 0.1 mL of sterile water is injected between the dermal layers to raise a small bleb on the skin surface at each of the four sites. In labor, the injections are administered sequentially during a uterine contraction, with the series of four injections, performed two at a time, completed within 20-30 seconds.
The investigators hypothesize that the use of sterile water injections in women with neuraxial analgesia with breakthrough pain will result in decreased local anesthetic requirements and increase patient satisfaction.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Since it is assumed that the neuraxial anesthetic is placed prior to transition to active phase of labor, the patient will receive the intervention when they report breakthrough pain. Prior to administration of the intervention, the adequacy of the existing neuraxial anesthetic will be verified as bilateral decreased discrimination to cold from T8 to the sacrum. Four tuberculin syringes, each containing 0.1 mL of the assigned solution labeled "study drug" will be prepared. Patients allocated to the study group will receive sterile water, and those allocated to the control group will receive sterile normal saline solution.
The area to be injected will be prepared with chlorhexidine wipes to ensure sterility. In the sitting position, study subjects will receive a total of 0.4 mL of "study drug" via four injections: bilateral injections at the posterior superior iliac spine on and bilateral injections at 1 cm medial and 1-2 cm inferior to the first point.
Patients will be asked to rate their overall labor pain using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain prior to study drug administration and every 30 minutes until commencement of pushing. They will also be asked to specifically rate low back pain with the VAS. Analgesia administration data from the time of study drug injection, including maintenance epidural solution volume, time of first patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) bolus request, number of PCEA bolus requests and delivered doses, total PCEA bupivacaine dose, time to first request for manual rebolus, number of manual bolus doses, manual bolus bupivacaine dose, total bupivacaine dose and total fentanyl dose.
Additional recorded data will include maternal age, height, weight, cervical dilation at initiation of neuraxial analgesia and at study drug administration, duration of labor (initiation of analgesia to delivery), maximum oxytocin infusion rate during labor, and mode of delivery. A "total labor pain score" will be assessed approximately 60 minute after delivery, as well as satisfaction with labor analgesia using a 100-mm VAS.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- multiparous women
- spontaneous labor
- at least 18 years of age
- presenting for vaginal delivery with cervical dilation of 4 centimeters or less
Exclusion Criteria:
- nulliparous
- less than 18 years old
- contraindication to placement of neuraxial anesthetic
- skin infection in area to be injected
- medical therapies considered to result in tolerance to opioids
- history of chronic pain (requiring regular medical follow-up with pain specialists)
- recent use of opioid analgesics (within the year preceding pregnancy)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Sterile Water Injection
In the sitting position, study subjects will receive a total of 0.4 mL of "study drug" via four intracutaneous injections: bilateral injections at the posterior superior iliac spine and bilateral injections at 1 cm medial and 1-2 cm inferior to the first point.
|
Four intracutaneous injections: two sites lateral to the lumbosacral spine and two sites 2-3 centimeters below and 1- 2 centimeters medial to the original two injections sites.
0.1 millimeters of the study drug is injected between the dermal layers at each of the four sites.
The injections are administered sequentially, with the series of four injections, performed two at a time, completed in 20-30 seconds.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Normal Saline Injection
In the sitting position, study subjects will receive a total of 0.4 mL of "study drug" via four intracutaneous injections: bilateral injections at the posterior superior iliac spine and bilateral injections at 1 cm medial and 1-2 cm inferior to the first point.
|
Four intracutaneous injections: two sites lateral to the lumbosacral spine and two sites 2-3 centimeters below and 1- 2 centimeters medial to the original two injections sites.
0.1 millimeters of the study drug is injected between the dermal layers at each of the four sites.
The injections are administered sequentially, with the series of four injections, performed two at a time, completed in 20-30 seconds.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Breakthrough Back Labor Pain
Time Frame: within 24 hours
|
It is anticipated that intracutaneous sterile water injections will provide additional pain relief as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen in women, especially in women with back labor.
|
within 24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Local Anesthetic Consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
It is anticipated that intracutaneous sterile water injections will decrease the amount of local anesthetic consumption.
|
24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Cynthia Wong, MD, Northwestern University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wong CA, McCarthy RJ, Hewlett B. The effect of manipulation of the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and injection volume on total drug use for labor epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011 Apr;112(4):904-11. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820e7c2f.
- Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971. No abstract available.
- Creehan PA. Pain relief and comfort measures in labor. In: Simpson KR, Creehan PA, editors. AWHONN's Perinatal Nursing, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. pp. 444-72.
- Cervero F, Tattersall JE. Somatic and visceral sensory integration in the thoracic spinal cord. Prog Brain Res. 1986;67:189-205. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62763-6. No abstract available.
- Bengtsson J, Worning AM, Gertz J, Struckmann J, Bonnesen T, Palludan H, Olsen PR, Frimodt-Moller C. [Pain due to urolithiasis treated by intracutaneous injection of sterile water. A clinically controlled double-blind study]. Ugeskr Laeger. 1981 Dec 14;143(51):3463-5. No abstract available. Danish.
- Odent M. [Letter: Lumbar reflexotherapy. Efficacy in the treatment of nephrotic colic and in obstretrical analgesia]. Nouv Presse Med. 1975 Jan 18;4(3):188. No abstract available. French.
- Huntley AL, Coon JT, Ernst E. Complementary and alternative medicine for labor pain: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.008.
- Reynolds JL. Intracutaneous sterile water for back pain in labour. Can Fam Physician. 1994 Oct;40:1785-8, 1791-2.
- Martensson L, McSwiggin M, Mercer JS. US midwives' knowledge and use of sterile water injections for labor pain. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;53(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.09.008.
- Hutton EK, Kasperink M, Rutten M, Reitsma A, Wainman B. Sterile water injection for labour pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BJOG. 2009 Aug;116(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02221.x. Epub 2009 May 14.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STU00057039
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Labor Pain
-
Antalya Bilim UniversityCompletedChildbirth | Normal Labor | Labor Pain and to Reduce PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Pınar ErdoğanCompletedLabor Progress | Labor Pain and AnxietyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Soovu Labs Inc.Virginia Mason Hospital/Medical CenterNot yet recruiting
-
Bogomolets National Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-WittenbergCompleted
-
Maimonides Medical CenterTerminated
-
Roi TreisterHillel Yaffe Medical CenterNot yet recruitingLabor Pain and to Reduce PainIsrael
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaCompletedLabor Pain, Stress, Childbirth SatisfactionTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Intracutaneous injections
-
Lindsey schmelzerTerminatedLow Back PainUnited States
-
Hans LaubachNot yet recruiting
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterDutch Diabetes Research FoundationCompletedDiabetes Mellitus | Polyneuropathies | Arthropathy, NeurogenicNetherlands
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedSurgery | Skin TumourNetherlands
-
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation TrustRoyal College of Surgeons of EnglandUnknownThermography | Laser Doppler Blood Flow | Spectrophotometric Intracutaneous AnalysisUnited Kingdom
-
St. Olavs HospitalNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyCompleted
-
Linio Biotech OyClinius LtdRecruiting
-
Delta University for Science and TechnologyCompleted
-
Medical University of SilesiaCompletedMyalgia | Bruxism | Temporomandibular Disorder | PRPPoland
-
Vivozon, Inc.CompletedPain, PostoperativeUnited States