Gene Xpert Diagnosis of TB Using Tracheal Aspirates From Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients

January 6, 2015 updated by: Keertan Dheda, University of Cape Town

A Randomised Control Trial of a Standardised and User-friendly Real-time PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of TB Using Tracheal Aspirates Obtained From Patients in the ICU

Aim:

To evaluate the diagnostic utility and impact on patient outcomes of an automated PCR (Gene Xpert® MTB/RIF), in a group of patients with suspected pulmonary TB who are mechanically ventilated in ICU, using tracheal aspirates.

Hypothesis:

Gene Xpert is an accurate tool for the diagnosis of TB in the Intensive Care Unit and will impact on rates of treatment initiation and hospital stay.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious global public health emergency and there is a great need for the improvement of current diagnostic tools and the evaluation of newer and novel technologies for the rapid diagnosis of TB. The most common testing method for TB is sputum smear microscopy, which has remained largely unchanged in its sophistication and sensitivity. Smear microscopy detects around 50% of all active TB cases and is not capable of identifying drug resistance. Furthermore, even though culture is more accurate results are only available in several weeks. Treating patients empirically for TB exposes patients to the toxic side-effects of drugs, and if there is no response to treatment, raises the question of MDR-TB. These considerations apply to clinical decision-making in the ICU where TB is not infrequently encountered. A diagnosis of TB in this setting has important implications for drug-drug interactions, route of administration, and drug toxicity.

The Gene Xpert® system's MTB/RIF Assay, an on-demand molecular test for simultaneous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) and rifampicin (RIF) resistance, has recently been released. This is the only system that combines on-board sample preparation with real-time PCR [1]. Helb and colleagues developed and performed the first analysis of the Cepheid Gene Xpert System's MTB/RIF assay. They evaluated the diagnostic utility of the system using sputum samples and showed that the system was highly sensitive and simple-to-use [2]. A recent paper (NEJM, 2010, in press) that enrolled almost 2000 patients found Xpert to have a sensitivity of almost 90% in smear-negative TB. However, how the test will perform when using tracheal aspirates is unknown. It is also unclear whether the test will have any impact in the ICU where the decision to treat is often made clinically and empiric treatment is initiated. To address these questions we aim to obtain tracheal aspirates from about 120 mechanically ventilated patients with suspected TB from the Groote Schuur Hospital Intensive Care Unit. Tests will be conducted at the Lung Infection and Immunity Unit laboratory (Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town) to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay in this group of patients. The expected study period will be 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

341

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Western Cape
      • Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa, 7925
        • Groote Schuur Hospital, which operates within the Cape Town Central Health District of the Metro Region

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

1. Any ventilated patients over 18 years of age with suspected TB (suggestive pulmonary infiltrates, a history of constitutional symptoms preceding the ICU admission, or patients known or suspected to be infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)).

Exclusion criteria:

1. Patients known to have active TB or to already be on antituberculous medication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Smear
Routine microbiology based diagnostics for TB
This arm receives smear microscopy
Experimental: GeneXpert
Arm that will receive the Xpert test
This arm receives the GeneXpert test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of TB treatment initiation
Time Frame: 48 hours
The proportion of patients on TB treatment in each arm will be compared longitudinally
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality in ICU
Time Frame: up to 2 months
The time-specific proportion of patients who have died prior to discharge will be compared across arms
up to 2 months
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: Up to 2 weeks
The median Duration of mechanical ventilation will be compared between arms prior to discharge up to 2 weeks
Up to 2 weeks
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: up to 3 months
The median ICU length of stay will be compared up to 3 months
up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Keertan Dheda, PhD, University of Cape Town

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2015

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tuberculosis

Clinical Trials on Smear

Subscribe