Telecytology as a Triage Tool in LMICs

January 28, 2025 updated by: Prof. Patrick Petignat, University Hospital, Geneva

Pilot Study Evaluating the Feasibility of Digitalised Cytolological Slides for Telecytology, Before Implementation in Cameroon

The investigators will collect PAP-test samples from women undergoing colposcopy. Laboratory providers will prepare the samples with a liquid-based cytology method. The providers will then digitalise the slides using a digital scanner. The slides will be sent to cytopathologists who will assess the quality of the slides.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study will take place over four months. The consultation where the clinician undertakes the colposcopy and takes the additional cytological sample will be the only visit necessary for the patient in relation to the study.

The investigators will require thirty usable cervical samples from the colposcopy clinic of the Maternity of Geneva. The spatula used to take the smear should be immediately transferred to a 10ml sample pot and the head of the spatula should be snapped off and left inside. The investigators will only accept samples that have followed the aformentioned conditions, and it is expected to recruit more than the 30 participants needed if sampling is insufficient. The samples will be prepared by one of 3 laboratory technicians at the same hospital using the manual Surepath® liquid-based preparation method. This includes cell randomization, pipetting and enrichment of diagnostic cervical cells through centrifugation using a settling chamber to create a cellular slide preparation in a circle of 13 mm diameter. The Pap staining procedure is then applied within the chamber.

All thirty glass slides will be scanned and digitalized with a compact portable scanner (Ocus, ®40 by Grundium, Finland). The same laboratory technician who prepared the cervical sample will scan the slide. Ocus ®40 has a 1-slide capacity and permits the acquisition of a whole-slide image as well as robotic microscopy. The scanner features a 12-megapixel image sensor with a 40x objective (numerical aperture: 0.75) and can be connected to a laptop computer over a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) connection. To avoid areas being out of focus, the Z-stack modality of acquisition will be used at three focal plane levels with a 1 µ interval. In Europe, Ocus®40 is IVDR certified for diagnostic use.

The ease of the manual preparation method and scanning of slides will be assessed by asking the laboratory technician to rate the difficulty from very easy to very difficult on a 5-point rating scale (score 1= very difficult, 5=very easy) for each preparation step. The time taken for the manual preparation and scanning of glass slides will also be measured with a stopwatch and recorded by the technician.

Quality characteristics of the thirty digitalized slides will be scored as excellent, good, fair, or poor (based on sharpness and visualization through thick cell clusters) by two cytopathologists reading the slides. The time taken to screen digitized slides will be calculated.

In addition, cellularity will be assessed in the preparation area of the glass slide. Under a 40× objective and an eyepiece with a field number of 20, the total number of cells will be computed using the following formula: N=n(acd/amf), where N=total cell count, n=mean cell count of 10 adjacent fields of view along the horizontal diameter in the center of the circle, acd=area of cell deposit and amf=area of microscopic field.

The following data will be recorded and stored for each patient

  • the number between 1-30 that has been given to the patient plus previous cytological diagnosis
  • the easiness rating for each step of the manual preparation of the slide (lab technician)
  • The easiness rating for the scanning/digitalization of the slides (lab technician)
  • the quality rating based on sharpness and visualization through thick cell clusters for each slide (cytopathologists)
  • the cellularity of each slide (cytopathologists)
  • the time taken to prepare (lab technician), digitalize (lab technician) and read (cytopathologists) the slides

There will be a separate form for the laboratory providers and the cytopathologists. The data from the lab technician and the cytopathologists will be subsequently unified.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1205
        • University Hospitals Geneva

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

women aged >18 who are undergoing colposcopy at the Geneva University Hospitals (HUG)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women aged > 18 who are undergoing colposcopy at the Geneva University Hospitals (HUG)
  • Women who are able to give informed consent as documented by signature
  • Availability of an adequate sample for analysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Women who have had a hysterectomy
  • Women in whom cytology is indicated at time of colposcopy (independently of this study)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quality of digitalized slide
Time Frame: 4 months
Quality of the prepared and digitalised slide as measured by a score allocated by cytopathologists pertaining to sharpness and visualisation through thick cell clusters (scored as excellent (maximal value), good, fair or poor (minimum value)) as well as the cellularity of the slide.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Simplicity of process
Time Frame: 4 months
- Easiness score allocated by the laboratory providers after the preparation and digitalisation of each slide (1=very difficult; 5=very easy)
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trials on Cervical smear test

Subscribe