- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01532869
A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) Versus Placebo in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis
August 2, 2016 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche
A Phase II/III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study To Assess The Efficacy And Safety Of Tocilizumab Versus Placebo In Patients With Systemic Sclerosis
This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel-group study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in participants with systemic sclerosis.
Participants will be randomized to receive either RoActemra/Actemra 162 mg subcutaneously weekly or placebo for 48 weeks.
From Week 48 to Week 96, all participants will receive open-label RoActemra/Actemra 162 mg subcutaneously weekly.
Anticipated time on study treatment is 96 weeks.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
87
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4V2
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X5
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
-
-
-
-
-
Bordeaux, France, 33075
-
Caen, France, 14033
-
Lille, France, 59037
-
Paris, France, 75679
-
Strasbourg, France, 67091
-
Toulouse, France, 31000
-
-
-
-
-
Bad Nauheim, Germany, 61231
-
Baden-Baden, Germany, 76530
-
Berlin, Germany, 10177
-
Bochum, Germany, 44791
-
Dresden, Germany, 01067
-
Erlangen, Germany, 91054
-
Frankfurt, Germany, 60528
-
Hamburg, Germany, 22763
-
Köln, Germany, 50937
-
Tübingen, Germany, 72076
-
Ulm, Germany, 89081
-
-
-
-
-
Cannock, United Kingdom, WS11 5XY
-
Dundee, United Kingdom, DD1 9SY
-
Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH4 2XU
-
Leeds, United Kingdom, LS7 4SA
-
Liverpool, United Kingdom, L9 7AL
-
London, United Kingdom, NW3 2QG
-
Middlesborough, United Kingdom, TS4 3BW
-
Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE7 7DN
-
Romford, United Kingdom, RM7 0AG
-
-
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90025
-
San Diego, California, United States, 44122
-
Stanford, California, United States, 94305-5317
-
-
Connecticut
-
Farmington, Connecticut, United States, 06030
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109-0934
-
-
New Jersey
-
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
-
-
New York
-
Lake Success, New York, United States, 11042
-
New York, New York, United States, 10021
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
-
Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43614
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73103
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19131
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15261
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- Systemic sclerosis, as defined by American College of Rheumatology (1980) criteria
- Disease duration of </= 60 months (defined as time from first non-Raynaud phenomenon manifestation)
- >/= 15 and </= 40 mRSS units at screening
- Active disease, as defined by protocol
- Uninvolved skin at injection sites
- Negative pregnancy test for a female subject of childbearing potential
Exclusion Criteria:
- Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to and/or during study enrollment
- Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than systemic sclerosis
- Skin thickening (scleroderma) limited to areas distal to the elbows or knees at screening
- Previous treatment with tocilizumab
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to human, humanized, or murine monoclonal antibodies
- Severe cardiopulmonary disease
- Known active current or history of recurrent infections
- Use of any investigational, biologic, or immunosuppressive therapies including intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids prior to study enrollment as specified in the protocol
- As specified in the protocol, any current or past medical condition or medical history involving but not limited to the nervous, renal, pulmonary, endocrine, and gastrointestinal organ systems determined by the Principal Investigator to pose a significant safety risk to any subject while participating in the study
- Primary or secondary immunodeficiency
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
|
Subcutaneously weekly, Weeks 0-48
162 mg subcutaneously weekly, Weeks 0-48
162 mg subcutaneously weekly, Week 48-96
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Tocilizumab
|
162 mg subcutaneously weekly, Weeks 0-48
162 mg subcutaneously weekly, Week 48-96
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
|
Skin thickness was assessed by the mRSS.
The mRSS was rated with scores ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe skin thickening) across 17 different sites.
The total score was the sum of the individual skin scores in the 17 body areas (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet), giving a range of 0-51 units and had been validated for participants with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
A negative change from baseline showed improvement.
|
Baseline, Week 24
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Week 48
|
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug.
An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 8 after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
|
Week 48
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Assessed by Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (SHAQ-DI)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
SHAQ-DI assessed five scleroderma-specific visual analogue scale (VAS) items to explore the impact of participant's disease.
These items were developed to measure the effect of scleroderma on five elements of disease that could have a great impact on a participant's daily activities.
Each VAS item was rated separately (0-100 millimeters [mm]), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
The five items were: 1) intestinal disease, 2) breathing problem, 3) Raynaud syndrome, 4) finger ulcers, and 5) overall disease.
|
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
The HAQ-DI scale consisted of 20 questions referring to eight component sets: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.
The total score indicated the participant's self-assessed level of disability.
There are four possible responses for each component: 0 = without any difficulty; 1 = with some difficulty; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = unable to do.
The HAQ-DI was the sum of the domain scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (i.e. the average score), with total range of 0 to 3, higher scores showing larger functional limitation.
|
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
The Clinician's Global Assessment evaluated the overall impact of SSc on the participant as assessed by the physician on a VAS with scores ranging from 0 to 100 mm, with higher scores indicating worse disease in terms of severity, damage, or overall disease, but there was no standardization for the scale.
|
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
The Patient's Global Assessment was a patient's reported outcome that represented the participant's overall assessment of his or her current SSc on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale (0 mm to 100 mm), with higher scores indicating worsening disease.
|
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
This FACIT-Fatigue Scale was a 13-item measure with participants scoring each item on a 5-point scale (0 to 4) up to 52 points.
The endpoint measured was fatigue.
On this scale, a numerical increase indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.
|
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
|
Change From Baseline in 5-D Itch Scale at Week 24 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
The 5-D Itch Scale contained five domains of duration, degree, direction, disability, and distribution.
The endpoint of the scale was pruritus.
Each domain was scored on a 5-point scale, the scores of each of the five domains were achieved separately and then summed together to obtain a total 5-D score.
5-D scores ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus).
|
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
|
|
Change From Baseline in mRSS at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
|
Skin thickness was assessed by the mRSS.
The mRSS was rated with scores ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe skin thickening) across 17 different sites.
The total score was the sum of the individual skin scores in the 17 body areas (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet), giving a range of 0-51 units and had been validated for participants with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
A negative change from baseline showed improvement.
|
Baseline, Week 48
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained or Improved in mRSS From Week 24 to Week 48
Time Frame: Week 48
|
Skin thickness was assessed by the mRSS.
The mRSS was rated with scores ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe skin thickening) across 17 different sites.
The total score was the sum of the individual skin scores in the 17 body areas (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet), giving a range of 0-51 units and had been validated for participants with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
A negative change from baseline showed improvement.
Percentage of participants with an improvement in mRSS at Week 24 (change from baseline <0) that maintained or further improved at Week 48 were reported as "Yes" and "No" with Yes = improvers at week 24 that had a change from baseline in mRSS at Week 48 <= change from baseline at Week 24.
|
Week 48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48
|
Joint tenderness was evaluated as per assessment of 28 joints.
Joints on both sides of the body, including shoulders, elbows, wrists, 10 metacarpal phalangeal (MCP) joints, 10 proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) joints, and both knees, were assessed.
Joints were classified as not tender = 0 or tender = 1.
Observed data was presented for this outcome measure.
|
Baseline, Weeks 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48
|
|
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time 0 to 168 Hour (AUC0-168)
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 or 144, and 168 hours post dose for Baseline and Week 16
|
AUC was a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time which was measured in micrograms times (*) hour per milliliters (µg*hr/mL).
It is used to characterize drug absorption.
|
Pre-dose, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 or 144, and 168 hours post dose for Baseline and Week 16
|
|
Mean Serum Concentrations of Interleukin (IL)-6 by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, and 48
|
Observed data was presented for this outcome measure.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, and 48
|
|
Mean Serum Concentrations of Soluble IL-6 Receptor (R) by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, and 48
|
Observed data was presented for this outcome measure.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, and 48
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Tocilizumab Antibody
Time Frame: Baseline, and post-baseline (up to Week 48)
|
Baseline, and post-baseline (up to Week 48)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Gao X, Jia G, Guttman A, DePianto DJ, Morshead KB, Sun KH, Ramamoorthi N, Vander Heiden JA, Modrusan Z, Wolters PJ, Jahreis A, Arron JR, Khanna D, Ramalingam TR. Osteopontin Links Myeloid Activation and Disease Progression in Systemic Sclerosis. Cell Rep Med. 2020 Nov 17;1(8):100140. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100140. eCollection 2020 Nov 17.
- Stifano G, Sornasse T, Rice LM, Na L, Chen-Harris H, Khanna D, Jahreis A, Zhang Y, Siegel J, Lafyatis R. Skin Gene Expression Is Prognostic for the Trajectory of Skin Disease in Patients With Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Jun;70(6):912-919. doi: 10.1002/art.40455.
- Denton CP, Ong VH, Xu S, Chen-Harris H, Modrusan Z, Lafyatis R, Khanna D, Jahreis A, Siegel J, Sornasse T. Therapeutic interleukin-6 blockade reverses transforming growth factor-beta pathway activation in dermal fibroblasts: insights from the faSScinate clinical trial in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Sep;77(9):1362-1371. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213031. Epub 2018 May 31.
- Khanna D, Denton CP, Lin CJF, van Laar JM, Frech TM, Anderson ME, Baron M, Chung L, Fierlbeck G, Lakshminarayanan S, Allanore Y, Pope JE, Riemekasten G, Steen V, Muller-Ladner U, Spotswood H, Burke L, Siegel J, Jahreis A, Furst DE. Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis: results from the open-label period of a phase II randomised controlled trial (faSScinate). Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77(2):212-220. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211682. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
- Khanna D, Denton CP, Jahreis A, van Laar JM, Frech TM, Anderson ME, Baron M, Chung L, Fierlbeck G, Lakshminarayanan S, Allanore Y, Pope JE, Riemekasten G, Steen V, Muller-Ladner U, Lafyatis R, Stifano G, Spotswood H, Chen-Harris H, Dziadek S, Morimoto A, Sornasse T, Siegel J, Furst DE. Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in adults with systemic sclerosis (faSScinate): a phase 2, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Jun 25;387(10038):2630-2640. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00232-4. Epub 2016 May 5. Erratum In: Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1356.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2014
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
August 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 14, 2012
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
February 15, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
September 23, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 2, 2016
Last Verified
August 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- WA27788
- 2011-001460-22 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sclerosis, Systemic
-
AmgenTerminatedDiffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis | Sclerosis, SystemicSpain, Japan, Romania, United States, Mexico, Argentina, Israel, Greece, Chile, Serbia, South Korea, Italy, Poland, Portugal, United Kingdom
-
Beijing GoBroad HospitalCARsgen Therapeutics Co., Ltd.RecruitingSystemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) | Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)China
-
AmgenTerminatedDiffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis | Sclerosis, SystemicSpain, Serbia
-
Michael M. PhamTerminatedSystemic Sclerosis | Scleroderma, Systemic | Scleroderma, Diffuse | Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis | Interstitial Lung Disease | Scleroderma | Systemic Sclerosis, Diffuse | Diffuse Systemic Sclerosis | Pulmonary Fibrosis Interstitial | Diffuse Scleroderma | Diffuse Cutaneous Scleroderma | Progressive Systemic... and other conditionsUnited States
-
argenxRecruitingSystemic Sclerosis (SSc)Croatia, Spain, Denmark, Italy, Germany, Lithuania, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium, United States, Switzerland, Mexico, Argentina, France, Bulgaria, Chile, Greece, Serbia, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Czechia, Romania, Hungary
-
Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)CompletedSystemic Scleroderma | Severe Systemic SclerosisUnited States
-
University of ManchesterCompletedEarly Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis
-
Kadmon, a Sanofi CompanyTerminatedDiffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis | System; SclerosisUnited States
-
University of PatrasRecruitingSSc-Systemic SclerosisGreece
-
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong...CARsgen Therapeutics Co., Ltd.RecruitingSSc-Systemic SclerosisChina
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknownHypertension | DyslipidemiasKorea, Republic of