A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) Versus Placebo in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis

August 2, 2016 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Phase II/III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study To Assess The Efficacy And Safety Of Tocilizumab Versus Placebo In Patients With Systemic Sclerosis

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel-group study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in participants with systemic sclerosis. Participants will be randomized to receive either RoActemra/Actemra 162 mg subcutaneously weekly or placebo for 48 weeks. From Week 48 to Week 96, all participants will receive open-label RoActemra/Actemra 162 mg subcutaneously weekly. Anticipated time on study treatment is 96 weeks.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

87

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4V2
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X5
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
      • Bordeaux, France, 33075
      • Caen, France, 14033
      • Lille, France, 59037
      • Paris, France, 75679
      • Strasbourg, France, 67091
      • Toulouse, France, 31000
      • Bad Nauheim, Germany, 61231
      • Baden-Baden, Germany, 76530
      • Berlin, Germany, 10177
      • Bochum, Germany, 44791
      • Dresden, Germany, 01067
      • Erlangen, Germany, 91054
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60528
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22763
      • Köln, Germany, 50937
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
      • Ulm, Germany, 89081
      • Cannock, United Kingdom, WS11 5XY
      • Dundee, United Kingdom, DD1 9SY
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH4 2XU
      • Leeds, United Kingdom, LS7 4SA
      • Liverpool, United Kingdom, L9 7AL
      • London, United Kingdom, NW3 2QG
      • Middlesborough, United Kingdom, TS4 3BW
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE7 7DN
      • Romford, United Kingdom, RM7 0AG
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90025
      • San Diego, California, United States, 44122
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305-5317
    • Connecticut
      • Farmington, Connecticut, United States, 06030
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109-0934
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
    • New York
      • Lake Success, New York, United States, 11042
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43614
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73103
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19131
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15261
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
  • Systemic sclerosis, as defined by American College of Rheumatology (1980) criteria
  • Disease duration of </= 60 months (defined as time from first non-Raynaud phenomenon manifestation)
  • >/= 15 and </= 40 mRSS units at screening
  • Active disease, as defined by protocol
  • Uninvolved skin at injection sites
  • Negative pregnancy test for a female subject of childbearing potential

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to and/or during study enrollment
  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than systemic sclerosis
  • Skin thickening (scleroderma) limited to areas distal to the elbows or knees at screening
  • Previous treatment with tocilizumab
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to human, humanized, or murine monoclonal antibodies
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease
  • Known active current or history of recurrent infections
  • Use of any investigational, biologic, or immunosuppressive therapies including intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids prior to study enrollment as specified in the protocol
  • As specified in the protocol, any current or past medical condition or medical history involving but not limited to the nervous, renal, pulmonary, endocrine, and gastrointestinal organ systems determined by the Principal Investigator to pose a significant safety risk to any subject while participating in the study
  • Primary or secondary immunodeficiency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Subcutaneously weekly, Weeks 0-48
162 mg subcutaneously weekly, Weeks 0-48
162 mg subcutaneously weekly, Week 48-96
EXPERIMENTAL: Tocilizumab
162 mg subcutaneously weekly, Weeks 0-48
162 mg subcutaneously weekly, Week 48-96

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Skin thickness was assessed by the mRSS. The mRSS was rated with scores ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe skin thickening) across 17 different sites. The total score was the sum of the individual skin scores in the 17 body areas (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet), giving a range of 0-51 units and had been validated for participants with systemic sclerosis (SSc). A negative change from baseline showed improvement.
Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Week 48
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 8 after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Assessed by Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (SHAQ-DI)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
SHAQ-DI assessed five scleroderma-specific visual analogue scale (VAS) items to explore the impact of participant's disease. These items were developed to measure the effect of scleroderma on five elements of disease that could have a great impact on a participant's daily activities. Each VAS item was rated separately (0-100 millimeters [mm]), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The five items were: 1) intestinal disease, 2) breathing problem, 3) Raynaud syndrome, 4) finger ulcers, and 5) overall disease.
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
The HAQ-DI scale consisted of 20 questions referring to eight component sets: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. The total score indicated the participant's self-assessed level of disability. There are four possible responses for each component: 0 = without any difficulty; 1 = with some difficulty; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. The HAQ-DI was the sum of the domain scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (i.e. the average score), with total range of 0 to 3, higher scores showing larger functional limitation.
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Change From Baseline in Clinician's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
The Clinician's Global Assessment evaluated the overall impact of SSc on the participant as assessed by the physician on a VAS with scores ranging from 0 to 100 mm, with higher scores indicating worse disease in terms of severity, damage, or overall disease, but there was no standardization for the scale.
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
The Patient's Global Assessment was a patient's reported outcome that represented the participant's overall assessment of his or her current SSc on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale (0 mm to 100 mm), with higher scores indicating worsening disease.
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
This FACIT-Fatigue Scale was a 13-item measure with participants scoring each item on a 5-point scale (0 to 4) up to 52 points. The endpoint measured was fatigue. On this scale, a numerical increase indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Change From Baseline in 5-D Itch Scale at Week 24 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
The 5-D Itch Scale contained five domains of duration, degree, direction, disability, and distribution. The endpoint of the scale was pruritus. Each domain was scored on a 5-point scale, the scores of each of the five domains were achieved separately and then summed together to obtain a total 5-D score. 5-D scores ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus).
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Change From Baseline in mRSS at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
Skin thickness was assessed by the mRSS. The mRSS was rated with scores ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe skin thickening) across 17 different sites. The total score was the sum of the individual skin scores in the 17 body areas (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet), giving a range of 0-51 units and had been validated for participants with systemic sclerosis (SSc). A negative change from baseline showed improvement.
Baseline, Week 48
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained or Improved in mRSS From Week 24 to Week 48
Time Frame: Week 48
Skin thickness was assessed by the mRSS. The mRSS was rated with scores ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe skin thickening) across 17 different sites. The total score was the sum of the individual skin scores in the 17 body areas (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet), giving a range of 0-51 units and had been validated for participants with systemic sclerosis (SSc). A negative change from baseline showed improvement. Percentage of participants with an improvement in mRSS at Week 24 (change from baseline <0) that maintained or further improved at Week 48 were reported as "Yes" and "No" with Yes = improvers at week 24 that had a change from baseline in mRSS at Week 48 <= change from baseline at Week 24.
Week 48
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48
Joint tenderness was evaluated as per assessment of 28 joints. Joints on both sides of the body, including shoulders, elbows, wrists, 10 metacarpal phalangeal (MCP) joints, 10 proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) joints, and both knees, were assessed. Joints were classified as not tender = 0 or tender = 1. Observed data was presented for this outcome measure.
Baseline, Weeks 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time 0 to 168 Hour (AUC0-168)
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 or 144, and 168 hours post dose for Baseline and Week 16
AUC was a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time which was measured in micrograms times (*) hour per milliliters (µg*hr/mL). It is used to characterize drug absorption.
Pre-dose, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 or 144, and 168 hours post dose for Baseline and Week 16
Mean Serum Concentrations of Interleukin (IL)-6 by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, and 48
Observed data was presented for this outcome measure.
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, and 48
Mean Serum Concentrations of Soluble IL-6 Receptor (R) by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, and 48
Observed data was presented for this outcome measure.
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Tocilizumab Antibody
Time Frame: Baseline, and post-baseline (up to Week 48)
Baseline, and post-baseline (up to Week 48)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 23, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • WA27788
  • 2011-001460-22 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sclerosis, Systemic

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe