Duration of hSBA Response After a Primary Series of Bivalent rLP2086 Followed by a Booster Dose

March 26, 2020 updated by: Pfizer

A PHASE 3 STUDY TO ASSESS THE PERSISTENCE OF HSBA RESPONSE UP TO 48 MONTHS AFTER COMPLETION OF A PRIMARY SERIES OF BIVALENT RLP2086, AND THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF A BOOSTER DOSE OF BIVALENT RLP2086

This study is to assess the longevity of immune response in adolescents for approximately 48 months after receipt of a primary series of bivalent rLP2086 vaccination, which is then followed by a booster dose and an assessment of immune response for 12 or 26 months post booster vaccination.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study is to assess the longevity of immune responses in adolescents (aged 10 to <19 years at the time of entry into a primary study) following receipt of a vaccination regimen of 2 or 3 doses of bivalent rLP2086 in a primary study. A booster dose of bivalent rLP2086 at approximately 48 months was given following the final dose of the 2- or 3-dose primary bivalent rLP2086 vaccination series. The study was therefore divided into Stage 1 (4-year persistence of immune responses following receipt of a primary vaccination series) and the booster stage (follow-up through 12 months for all boosted or 26 months for a subset of the boosted).

Subjects participating only in Stage 1 will attend up to 6 study visits for collection of a 20-mL blood sample at each visit. Subjects participating in both Stage 1 and booster stage will attend up to 9-10 study visits with 1 visit for booster dose vaccination and 8-9 visits for collection of a 20-mL blood sample at each visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

698

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Holice, Czechia, 53401
        • Ordinace praktického lékaře pro děti a dorost
      • Hradec Kralove, Czechia, 50005
        • Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove
      • Hradec Kralove, Czechia, 50004
        • Ordinace praktického lékaře pro děti a dorost
      • Hradec Kralove, Czechia, 50002
        • Ordinace praktického lékaře pro děti a dorost
      • Jindrichuv Hradec, Czechia, 37701
        • Ordinace praktického lékaře pro děti a dorost
      • Odolena Voda, Czechia, 25070
        • Ordinace praktického lékaře pro děti a dorost
      • Pardubice, Czechia, 53002
        • Ordinace praktického lékaře pro děti a dorost
      • Pardubice, Czechia, 53012
        • Ordinace praktického lékaře pro děti a dorost
      • Praha - Nusle, Czechia, 14000
        • Ordinace praktického lékaře pro děti a dorost
      • Praha 6, Czechia, 16000
        • Ordinace praktického lékaře pro děti a dorost
      • Sezemice, Czechia, 53304
        • Ordinace praktického lékaře pro děti a dorost
      • Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
      • Jarvenpaa, Finland, 04400
        • Järvenpää Vaccine Research Clinic
      • Pori, Finland, 28100
        • Pori Vaccine Research Clinic
      • Tampere, Finland, 33100
        • Tampere Vaccine Research Clinic
      • Turku, Finland, 20520
        • Turku Vaccine Research Clinic
      • Bad Saulgau, Germany, 88348
        • Kinder - und Jugendarzt Praxis
      • Bramsche, Germany, 49565
        • Kinderarzt Praxis
      • Eskilstuna, Sweden, 631 88
        • Infektionskliniken Malarsjukhuset
      • Malmo, Sweden, 205 02
        • Skanes universitetssjukhus
    • Arizona
      • Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85224
        • Clinical Research Advantage, Inc. / East Valley Family Physicians, PLC
      • Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85224
        • Clinical Research Advantage, Inc./ East Valley Family Physicians, PLC
    • California
      • Huntington Beach, California, United States, 92648
        • St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare
      • Paramount, California, United States, 90723
        • Center for Clinical Trials, LLC
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • California Research Foundation
      • Valley Village, California, United States, 91607
        • Bayview Research Group
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • USF Health
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • USF Health South Tampa Center for Advanced Healthcare
    • Georgia
      • Dalton, Georgia, United States, 30721
        • North Georgia Research Clinical Center
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30062
        • Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, PA
      • Woodstock, Georgia, United States, 30189
        • Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, P.A.
    • Idaho
      • Meridian, Idaho, United States, 83642
        • Advanced Clinical Research
    • Iowa
      • Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States, 51503
        • Clinical Research Advantage, Inc.
    • Kansas
      • Augusta, Kansas, United States, 67010
        • Heartland Research Associates, LLC
    • Kentucky
      • Bardstown, Kentucky, United States, 40004
        • Kentucky Pediatric/Adult Research
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40207
        • Brownsboro Park Pediatrics
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40291
        • Bluegrass Clinical Research, Inc.
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • U of L Pediatrics: Downtown
    • Michigan
      • Stevensville, Michigan, United States, 49127
        • Southwestern Medical Clinic Lakeland HealthCare Affiliate
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64114
        • The Center for Pharmaceutical Research
    • Nebraska
      • Fremont, Nebraska, United States, 68025
        • Clinical Research Advantage, Inc. (Prairie Fields Family Medicine, PC)
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68504
        • Midwest Children's Health Research Institute
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68131
        • Creighton University Pediatric Infectious Diseases
    • Nevada
      • Henderson, Nevada, United States, 89014
        • Clinical Research Center of Nevada,LLC
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44121
        • Dr. Shelly David Senders MD Inc. dba Senders Pediatrics
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45414
        • Ohio Pediatric Research Association
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45414
        • Ohio Pediatrics, Inc
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77055
        • West Houston Clinical Research Service (WHCRS)
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84109
        • J. Lewis Research, Inc. / Foothill Family Clinic
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84121
        • J. Lewis Research, Inc. / Foothill Family Clinic South
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84124
        • BB Holdings, LLC., dba Jean Brown Research
      • South Jordan, Utah, United States, 84095
        • J. Lewis Research Inc, Jordan River Family Medicine
      • West Jordan, Utah, United States, 84088-9334
        • Advanced Clinical Research
    • Washington
      • Vancouver, Washington, United States, 98664
        • The Vancouver Clinic, Inc. PS
    • Wisconsin
      • Monroe, Wisconsin, United States, 53566
        • Monroe Clinic
      • Monroe, Wisconsin, United States, 53566
        • Research and Education Association for Clinical Health, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Stage 1:

  1. Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document (ICD) indicating that the subject (or a legal representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
  2. Subjects who are willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.
  3. Subjects who completed a primary study and received all the scheduled injections within the originally planned schedule, either with bivalent rLP2086 (either 2 or 3 doses) or with investigational product in cases where subject vaccine assignment is blinded at the time of consent for study B1971033.
  4. Subjects who completed the blood draw following the last vaccination and subjects who completed the 6-month follow-up telephone call in the primary study.

Inclusion Criteria for Booster Stage Visits 7-10 (up to12 month post booster follow up):

  1. Evidence of a personally signed and dated ICD indicating that the subject or subject's parent(s)/legal guardian has been informed of all pertinent aspects for Visits 7 to 10 of the booster stage of the study.
  2. Subject continues to meet all Stage 1 inclusion and none of the Stage 1 exclusion criteria.
  3. Subject is confirmed as having received bivalent rLP2086 in the primary vaccination study.
  4. Subject has completed B1971033 Stage 1 and completed the Visit 6 blood draw.
  5. Subject is available for the entire period of the booster stage and the subject or subject's parent(s)/legal guardian can be reached by telephone.
  6. Healthy subject as determined by medical history, physical examination, and judgment of the investigator.
  7. Male and female subjects of childbearing potential and at risk for pregnancy must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception through Visit 10 of the booster stage. A subject is of childbearing potential if, in the opinion of the investigator, he/she is biologically capable of having children and is sexually active. Refer to Section 4.5 for further information.
  8. Negative urine pregnancy test for all female subjects on the day of the booster dose.

Inclusion Criteria for Booster Stage Visit11 (26 month post booster follow up):

  1. For subject participating in Visit 11, evidence of a personally signed and dated ICD indicating that the subject or subject's parent(s)/legal guardian has been informed of all pertinent aspects of Visit 11.
  2. Subject continues to meet all Stage 1 inclusion and none of the Stage 1 exclusion criteria.
  3. Subject must have received 2 or 3 doses of bivalent rLP2086 in the primary study on a 0-, 2-, and 6-month or a 0- and 6-month schedule.
  4. Subject must have completed booster vaccination at Visit 7.

Exclusion Criteria for Stage 1:

  1. Subjects who are investigational site staff members directly involved in the conduct of the trial and their family members, site staff members otherwise supervised by the investigator, or subjects who are Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the trial.
  2. With the exception of the primary study of bivalent rLP2086, participation in other studies within the 1-month (30-day) period before study Visit 1 and/or during study participation. Participation in purely observational studies is permitted.
  3. Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
  4. History of culture-proven disease caused by N meningitidis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
  5. Bleeding diathesis or condition associated with prolonged bleeding time that would contraindicate blood draw.
  6. Receipt of any blood products, including gamma globulin, in the period from 6 months before any study visit.
  7. Vaccination with any licensed or experimental meningococcal serogroup B vaccine since being enrolled in the primary Pfizer-sponsored MnB study (other than study vaccines permitted in the primary study).
  8. Subjects who were not compliant with primary study eligibility criteria while enrolled in the primary study.

Exclusion Criteria for Booster Stage:

  1. Subjects who are scheduled to receive 1 or more doses of a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine as part of a 3-dose series during the 28 days after the booster vaccination.
  2. A previous anaphylactic reaction to any vaccine or vaccine-related component.
  3. Subjects receiving any allergen immunotherapy with a nonlicensed product or receiving allergen immunotherapy with a licensed product and are not on stable maintenance doses.
  4. Bleeding diathesis or condition associated with prolonged bleeding time that would contraindicate intramuscular injection.
  5. A known or suspected defect of the immune system that would prevent an immune response to the vaccine, such as subjects with congenital or acquired defects in B-cell function, those receiving chronic systemic (oral, intravenous, or intramuscular) corticosteroid therapy, or those receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Subjects in the United States with terminal complement deficiency are excluded from participation in this study. Please refer to the study reference manual (SRM) for additional details.
  6. Significant neurological disorder or history of seizure (excluding simple febrile seizure).
  7. Current chronic use of systemic antibiotics.
  8. Current participation in another investigational study. Participation in purely observational studies is acceptable.
  9. Received any investigational vaccines, drugs, or devices within 28 days before administration of the booster vaccination.
  10. Any neuroinflammatory or autoimmune condition, including, but not limited to, transverse myelitis, uveitis, optic neuritis, and multiple sclerosis.
  11. Pregnant female subjects, breastfeeding female subjects, male subjects with partners who are currently pregnant, or male and female subjects of childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use a highly effective method of contraception as outlined in this protocol through Visit 10 of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: One group of subjects
Blood sample collection at different time points
A booster dose of bivalent rLP2086 at approximately 48 months following the final dose of the 2- or 3-dose primary bivalent rLP2086 vaccination series will be given at Visit 7.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 6 (Visit 1) After Primary Vaccinations
Time Frame: Month 6 (Visit 1 of study B1971033)
For immunogenicity assessment, serum bactericidal assay using human complement (hSBA) was performed with 4 primary Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MnB) test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer >= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CIs). LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants who received bivalent rLP2086 in primary study B1971012, entered in this study at Month 12 (Visit 2). Hence, no participants enrolled from primary study B1971012 had serology results at Month 6.
Month 6 (Visit 1 of study B1971033)
Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 12 (Visit 2) After Primary Vaccinations
Time Frame: Month 12 (Visit 2 of study B1971033)
For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer >= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44).
Month 12 (Visit 2 of study B1971033)
Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 18 (Visit 3) After Primary Vaccinations
Time Frame: Month 18 (Visit 3 of study B1971033)
For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer >= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44).
Month 18 (Visit 3 of study B1971033)
Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 24 (Visit 4) After Primary Vaccinations
Time Frame: Month 24 (Visit 4 of study B1971033)
For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer >= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44).
Month 24 (Visit 4 of study B1971033)
Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 36 (Visit 5) After Primary Vaccinations
Time Frame: Month 36 (Visit 5 of study B1971033)
For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer >= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44).
Month 36 (Visit 5 of study B1971033)
Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 48 (Visit 6) After Primary Vaccinations
Time Frame: Month 48 (Visit 6 of study B1971033)
For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer >= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44).
Month 48 (Visit 6 of study B1971033)
Percentage of Booster Stage Participants Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains 1 Month After Last Vaccination in Primary Study
Time Frame: 1 month after last vaccination in primary study
For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer >= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants of Group 3c (participants from primary study B1971015) were not continued in booster stage.
1 month after last vaccination in primary study
Percentage of Booster Stage Participants Achieving hSBA Titer Level (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation for Each of the 4 Primary Strains Before Booster Vaccination (48 Months After Last Vaccination in Primary Study [Visit 6])
Time Frame: Visit 6 of study B1971033 (48 months after last vaccination in primary study)
For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer >= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants of Group 3c (participants from primary study B1971015) were not continued in booster stage.
Visit 6 of study B1971033 (48 months after last vaccination in primary study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains 1 Month After the Booster Vaccination (Visit 8)
Time Frame: Visit 8 (1 month following the booster vaccination on Month 49)
For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer >= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants of Group 3c (participants from primary study B1971015) were not continued in booster stage.
Visit 8 (1 month following the booster vaccination on Month 49)
Percentage of Participants Achieving hSBATiter Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains 12 Months After the Booster Vaccination(Visit 10)
Time Frame: Visit 10 (12 months following the booster vaccination on Month 60)
For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer >= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants of Group 3c (participants from primary study B1971015) were not continued in booster stage.
Visit 10 (12 months following the booster vaccination on Month 60)
Percentage of Participants Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to(>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains 26 Months After the Booster Vaccination(Visit 11)
Time Frame: Visit 11 (26 months following the booster vaccination on Month 74)
For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer >= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants of Group 3c (participants from primary study B1971015) were not continued in booster stage. only participants who received bivalent rLP2086 in primary study B1971010 were not analysed for this endpoint. Only participants who received bivalent rLP2086 in primary study B1971012 on a 0-, 2-, and 6-month or a 0- and 6-month vaccination schedule were eligible to be followed for 26 months after booster vaccination
Visit 11 (26 months following the booster vaccination on Month 74)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Booster Vaccination
Time Frame: Within 7 days after booster vaccination on Month 48
Local reactions were collected by using an e-diary and included pain at injection site, redness and swelling. Redness and swelling were graded as: none (0-2.0 centimetre [cm]), mild (2.5-5.0 cm), moderate (greater than [>] 5.0-10.0 cm) and severe (>10.0 cm). Pain was graded as: mild (does not interfere with activity), moderate (Interferes with activity) and severe (prevents daily activity).
Within 7 days after booster vaccination on Month 48
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events and Antipyretic Use Within 7 Days After Booster Vaccination
Time Frame: Within 7 days after booster vaccination on Month 48
Systemic reactions included: fever, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, chills, muscle pain other than muscle pain at the injection site and joint pain, all other systemic reactions were recorded by using an e-diary. Fever was categorized as: 38.0 to 38.4 degree Celsius (C), 38.5 to 38.9 degree C, 39.0 to 40.0 degree C and > 40.0 degree C. Vomiting was graded as: mild (1 to 2 times in 24 hours [hrs]), moderate (>2 times in 24 hrs) and severe (requires intravenous [IV] hydration); Diarrhea was graded as: mild (2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hrs), moderate (4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hrs) and severe (6 or more loose stools in 24 hrs); Headache, fatigue, chills, muscle pain and joint pain was graded as: mild (does not interfere with daily activities), moderate (some interference with activity) and severe (prevents daily routine activity).
Within 7 days after booster vaccination on Month 48
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) and Medically Attended Adverse Event (MAE) From Booster Vaccination Phase (Visit 7 to Visit 8)
Time Frame: From Visit 7 (Month 48) to Visit 8 (Month 49) in Booster stage
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both non-serious AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs). An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC. An MAE was defined as a non serious AE (AE other than SAE) that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
From Visit 7 (Month 48) to Visit 8 (Month 49) in Booster stage
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Medically Attended Adverse Event (MAE) From Booster Follow-Up Phase (Visit 8 to Visit 9)
Time Frame: Visit 8 (Month 49) to Visit 9 (Month 54) in Booster stage
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. An MAE was defined as a non serious AE (AE other than SAE) that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Visit 8 (Month 49) to Visit 9 (Month 54) in Booster stage
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Medically Attended Adverse Event (MAE) From Booster Vaccination Through 6 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 7 to Visit 9)
Time Frame: From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) to Visit 9 (6 months after booster vaccination, Month 54)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. An MAE was defined as a nonserious AE (AE other than SAE) that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) to Visit 9 (6 months after booster vaccination, Month 54)
Percentage of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition;(NDCMC) From the 6-Month Safety Telephone Call in the Primary Study Through 48 Months After the Last Dose in the Primary Study (Visit 6 in Stage 1)
Time Frame: Visit 1 of B1971033 (6-month safety telephone call after last dose in primary study) to Visit 6 of B1971033 (6 months after last primary dose to 48 months after last primary dose in primary study)
An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC.
Visit 1 of B1971033 (6-month safety telephone call after last dose in primary study) to Visit 6 of B1971033 (6 months after last primary dose to 48 months after last primary dose in primary study)
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) From 1 Month After Booster Vaccination Through 12 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 8 to Visit 10)
Time Frame: From Visit 8 (1 month after booster vaccination, Month 49) to Visit 10 (12 months after booster vaccination, Month 60)
An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC.
From Visit 8 (1 month after booster vaccination, Month 49) to Visit 10 (12 months after booster vaccination, Month 60)
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) From Booster Stage Vaccination Through 12 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 7 to Visit 10)
Time Frame: From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) to Visit 10 (12 months after booster vaccination, Month 60)
An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC.
From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) to Visit 10 (12 months after booster vaccination, Month 60)
Percentage of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) From 1 Month After Booster Vaccination Through 26 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 8 to Visit 11)
Time Frame: From Visit 8 (1 month after booster vaccination, Month 49) to Visit 11 (26 months after booster vaccination, Month 74)
An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC. Participants who received bivalent rLP2086 in primary study B1971012 on a 0-, 2-, and 6-month or a 0- and 6-month vaccination schedule were eligible to be follow up for 26 months after booster vaccination.
From Visit 8 (1 month after booster vaccination, Month 49) to Visit 11 (26 months after booster vaccination, Month 74)
Percentage of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) From Booster Vaccine Through 26 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 7 to Visit 11)
Time Frame: From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) to Visit 11 (26 months after booster vaccination, Month 74)
An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC. Participants who received bivalent rLP2086 in primary study B1971012 on a 0-, 2-, and 6-month or a 0- and 6-month vaccination schedule were eligible to be follow up for 26 months after booster vaccination.
From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) to Visit 11 (26 months after booster vaccination, Month 74)
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Immediate Adverse Event (AE) After Booster Vaccination
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes after Booster Vaccination in Month 48
Immediate AE was defined as AEs occurring within the first 30 minutes after investigational product administration. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Within 30 minutes after Booster Vaccination in Month 48
Number of Days Participants Missed Work or School Due to AE From Booster Vaccination Through 6 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 7 Through Visit 9)
Time Frame: From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) Through Visit 9 (6 months after booster vaccination, Month 54)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Number of days participants missed work or school due to AE occurred following booster vaccination were reported here.
From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) Through Visit 9 (6 months after booster vaccination, Month 54)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 7, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 2, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • B1971033
  • 2011-005697-31 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Meningococcal Infection

Clinical Trials on blood sampling

3
Subscribe