Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of Early Introduction of Everolimus, Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitors and Early Steroid Elimination Compared to Standard CNI, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Steroid Regimen in Paediatric Renal Transplant Recipients

May 6, 2019 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A 12-month, Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of Early Introduction of Everolimus, Reduced CNI, and Early Steroid Elimination Compared to Standard CNI, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Steroid Regimen in Paediatric Renal Transplant Recipients With a 24-month Additional Safety Follow-up.

The purpose of this study is to determine if everolimus combined with reduced exposure CNI (TAC) is efficacious and safe and will support corticosteroid elimination compared to a standard exposure CNI (TAC) + MMF + steroid regimen after paediatric kidney transplantation. An additional purpose of the study is to assess the effect of the combination of EVR and reduced exposure CNI (TAC) on renal function.

This study is part of the requirements of the Paediatric Investigational Plan approved by Paediatric Committee at the European Medicines Agency (PDCO/EMA) on September 10, 2010, and is intended to support the indication of everolimus in the prevention of acute rejection in paediatric recipients of a renal transplant.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

106

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Santa Fe, Argentina, S3000EPV
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • RS
      • Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 90020-090
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04038-002
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bron Cedex, France, 69677
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Paris, France, 75019
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Paris cedex 15, France, 75015
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Essen, Germany, 45147
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Muenster, Germany, 48149
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1082
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • BO
      • Bologna, BO, Italy, 40138
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • GE
      • Genova, GE, Italy, 16147
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • ITA
      • Roma, ITA, Italy, 00165
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • PD
      • Padova, PD, Italy, 35128
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • TO
      • Torino, TO, Italy, 10126
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Oslo, Norway, 0424
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Warsaw, Poland, 04 730
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Barcelona
      • Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08950
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 14186
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Antalya, Turkey, 07070
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • London, United Kingdom, WC1N 1EH
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG7 2UH
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095-1752
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109-0331
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria at baseline:

  1. Written informed consent/assent must be obtained from the parent(s) or legal guardian before any assessment is performed.
  2. Primary or secondary paediatric kidney transplant recipient aged greater than or equal to 1 year and younger than 18 years receiving a deceased donor or non-HLA identical living donor (related or unrelated) renal transplant.

Inclusion criteria at randomization:

  1. Patients on TAC + MMF + steroids.
  2. Renal function with eGFR > 40 ml/min/1.73 m2 (Schwartz formula - abbreviated).

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria at baseline:

  1. Recipients of kidneys from donors with known renal disease (such as diabetes nephropathy, nephrosclerosis), at the time of transplant.
  2. Recipients of a kidney with a cold ischemia time > 24 hours.
  3. History of hypersensitivity or contraindications to any of the study drugs or to drugs of similar chemical classes, or to any of the excipients.
  4. History of malignancy of any organ system treated or untreated, carrying possible risk of recurrence according to current guidelines (Appendix 10 of protocol).

Exclusion criteria at randomization:

  1. Use of other investigational drugs at the time of randomization, or within 30 days or 5 half-lives prior randomization, whichever is longer.
  2. Patients with ongoing or recently (within 2 weeks prior to randomization) treated episodes of acute rejection (any grade) or a steroid resistant acute rejection at the time of randomization.
  3. Patients who experienced acute cellular rejection (Banff ≥1B) or any antibody mediated acute rejection or patients considered at high risk of antibody mediated acute rejection by the investigator assessment (e.g. presence of newly formed DSA, histological suspicion) at any time before randomization (as the DSA quantitative threshold to define high risk is not fully established, the assessment of the risk will be made after discussion between the laboratory expert and the investigator who will take into account all information available and apply best judgment).
  4. Patients with ongoing wound healing problems, clinically significant wound infection requiring continued therapy or other severe surgical complication in the opinion of the investigator.
  5. Patients who are treated with drugs that are strong inducers or inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and can not discontinue the treatment (see Appendix 6 for list of medications).
  6. Patients with nephrotic range proteinuria (protein to creatinine ratio ≥2.0 mg/mg or 200 mg/mmol (Hogg, 2003).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Investigational arm
Conversion from MMF to everolimus plus reduced dose tacrolimus and steroids withdrawal at 6 months after transplant
Everolimus (C0 trough level of 3-8 ng/mL) in combination with reduced dose tacrolimus and steroids withdrawal at 6 months after transplant
Active Comparator: Control arm
MMF continuation (in combination with tacrolimus and standard dose steroids)
MMF (Cellcept®): 600mg/m2/dose twice daily (1200 mg/m2/day) in combination with tacrolimus (Prograf) and standard dose steroids

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Having Reached the Composite Efficacy Endpoint of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection
Time Frame: 12 months, 36 months
To estimate the rate of the composite efficacy endpoint of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss or death at 12 months post transplantation in primary paediatric kidney transplant recipients converted at 4-6 weeks post-transplantation from MMF + standard TAC regimen and steroids, to everolimus + reduced dose TAC regimen and steroid withdrawal at 6 months, versus continuation of MMF + standard TAC regimen and steroids.
12 months, 36 months
To Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Abbreviated), at Month 12 and 36
Time Frame: 12 months and 36 months post-transplantation
To evaluate renal function assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) estimated by the Schwartz Formula (abbreviated) (Schwartz, 2009).
12 months and 36 months post-transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Efficacy Endpoint
Time Frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation
To evaluate the proportion of patients with the following efficacy events: Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), graft loss or death. The efficacy events will be descriptively summarized by treatment group.
at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation
To Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)
Time Frame: month 12, month 36

T-cell mediated rejection severity :

Type IA - Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).

Type IB - Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).

Type IIA - Mild to moderate intimal arteritis Type IIB - Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area Type III - Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation)

month 12, month 36
To Evaluate the Time to Event of BPAR
Time Frame: 36 months
Time to incidence of Event, given in terms of number of participants with an Event according to time interval up to 36 months
36 months
Incidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.
Time Frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation
To evaluate the proportion of patients with the following efficacy events: biopsy proven antibody mediated rejection/Steroid resistant BPAR and BPAR treated with T cell depleting therapy.
at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation
Chronic Allograft Nephropathy / Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy
Time Frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation.
To evaluate the proportion of patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, IF/TA) by histopathology and its progression.The term chronic allograft nephropathy was used inappropriately in the protocol and therefore, replaced by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy
at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation.
Proteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)
Time Frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation
The urinary protein/creatinine ratio will be descriptively summarized by treatment group at each visit. The incidence rate of patients with proteinuria will be categorized in <0.2 g/mg/mg, 0.2<2.0 mg/mg and ≥ 2.0 mg/mg and summarized by treatment groups at each visit.
at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation
Growth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From Baseline
Time Frame: month 12 , month 36 post transplantation.
Evaluation of the potential effects upon the bone growth. The Z-score is a statistical tool which helps to assess data (here child growth parameters) relative to a reference or standard population. The Z-score describes the distance and direction of an observation away from the population median (or mean, however, here the median was used). A negative Z-score shows that data are lower than the median of the standard population, a positive Z-score shows that data are higher than the median of the standard population, and a Z-score of zero shows that the data are equal to the median of the standard population. The more the Z-score is distant from 0, the more expressed is for example underweight or overweight.
month 12 , month 36 post transplantation.
Evaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Time
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months , 24 months, 36 months
results given as eGFR values by time interval
baseline, 6 months, 12 months , 24 months, 36 months
To Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Extended), at Month 12
Time Frame: 12 months post-transplantation
To evaluate renal function assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) estimated by the Schwartz Formula (extended) (Schwartz, 2009). Results given as change from randomization
12 months post-transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 17, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 3, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 24, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

Novartis is committed to sharing access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies with qualified external researchers. Requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to protect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prevention of Acute Rejection in Paediatric Recipients of a Renal Transplant

Clinical Trials on RAD001

3
Subscribe