Brain Imaging, Cognitive Enhancement and Early Schizophrenia (BICEPS)

February 25, 2021 updated by: Matcheri S. Keshavan MD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
The proposed project is designed to examine the effects of cognitive rehabilitation on brain structure and function in a randomized trial of 102 early course schizophrenia patients treated for 18 months with either cognitive enhancement therapy (CET) or an Enriched Supportive Therapy (EST) control, and then followed-up at 1-year post-treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Schizophrenia is a chronic and highly disabling disorder, making it imperative to apply interventions that alter its deleterious effects as early as possible. Impairments in neurocognition and social cognition, which appear to be linked to impaired structural and functional integrity in key brain regions, are the strongest predictors of functional disability in early course schizophrenia,making them key targets for early intervention. Although pharmacologic treatment of cognitive impairments is currently limited,our studies and others, including meta-analyses have shown that cognitive rehabilitation can be effective for addressing cognitive impairment in chronic patients. Most notably, Cognitive Enhancement Therapy (CET), a unique integrated approach to the rehabilitation of social and non-social cognitive impairments developed and tested by Hogarty and colleagues in our group, has shown substantial and lasting effects in chronic schizophrenia patients. Recently, the investigators have shown that the beneficial effects of CET can be successfully extended to those in the early phase of the disorder, resulting in large functional improvements.

The investigators have posited that CET can be particularly effective as an early intervention strategy by capitalizing on a fronto-temporal plasticity reserve, and the investigators are now observing compelling, albeit preliminary evidence that CET can indeed slow the progression of gray matter loss in these very regions of the brain, which is associated with significantly improved cognition (see Preliminary Studies). Preserved structural integrity and improved brain function in fronto-temporal regions may be the critical mechanisms for supporting cognitive improvement in early course schizophrenia, yet remarkably little is known about the neurobiologic effects of cognitive rehabilitation, the durability of these effects post-treatment, and whether an initial fronto-temporal reserve portends a greater treatment response. Our exciting preliminary findings of the neuroprotective effects of CET represent the first study to demonstrate that the structural integrity of the brain in the early course of schizophrenia can be altered using cognitive rehabilitation. It is critical that these morphologic findings are examined with more advanced imaging techniques in larger samples to gain a precise understanding of the underlying neurobiologic mechanisms and predictors of cognitive and functional enhancement in early course schizophrenia. These goals are reflective of the strategic plan of NIMH to identify underlying neural mechanisms of mental disorders that can facilitate treatment, and personalize care to optimize treatment response. To accomplish this, the investigators propose to use comprehensive structural and functional imaging methods to study 102 new early course schizophrenia patients treated for 18 months in a randomized trial of CET or Enriched Supportive Therapy (EST) and: Aim #1: Confirm the neuroprotective effects of CET on fronto-temporal brain structure. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments will be collected along with cognitive and functional outcome data at baseline, 9, and 18 months. It is hypothesized that patients treated with CET will demonstrate decreased loss of fronto-temporal gray matter relative to EST, and that this neuroprotection will be a mechanism of cognitive and functional improvement. Effects on other key brain regions will also be explored; Aim #2: Examine the effects of CET on fronto-temporal brain function. Functional MRI data using established executive and social cognition paradigms will be collected at baseline, 9, and 18 months along with cognitive and functional outcome data. It is hypothesized that CET patients will demonstrate enhanced fronto-temporal brain activity during these tasks relative to EST (see Section 3C.6.2 for specific predictions), and that this enhanced brain activity will be a mechanism of cognitive and functional improvement. Changes in fronto-temporal functional connectivity and their relations with improved brain structure and cognition will also be explored; and Aim #3: Examine the durability of CET effects on fronto-temporal brain structure and function, cognition, and functional outcome at 1 year post-treatment. Identical neuroimaging, cognitive, and behavioral data will be collected as those assessed during active treatment. It is hypothesized that the differential neurobiologic benefits of CET relative to EST observed in Aims 1 and 2, and the cognitive and functional benefits of CET observed during active treatment will be sustained 1 year post-treatment.

Exploratory Aim: Explore the effects of a fronto-temporal structural and functional reserve on CET treatment response. Moderator analyses will examine whether pre-treatment fronto-temporal structural and functional brain reserves (operationalized in Section 3C.8.2) predict larger cognitive and functional gains in CET. Exploratory analyses will also examine the degree to which later (18 mo) treatment improvement is dependent upon early (9 mo) neuroprotection and increased brain function, which may reflect plasticity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
      • Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, 02139
        • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
      • Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Western Psychiatry Institute and Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will be included if they have:

  1. a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder verified by the SCID (in our data patients with both conditions respond similarly to CET);
  2. duration since first psychotic symptom of < 10 years;
  3. stable positive symptoms based on medical record review and SCID for at least 2 months;
  4. are currently maintained on and compliant with prescribed antipsychotic medication;
  5. age 18-55 years;
  6. significant social and cognitive disability based on the Cognitive Style and Social Cognition Eligibility Interview utilized in previous CET studies;
  7. current IQ >= 80; and
  8. the ability to read (sixth grade level or higher) and speak fluent English. This is a study of early course schizophrenia, not first-episode schizophrenia. A duration of illness since first psychotic symptom of < 10 years is adequate to define the early phase of the illness, particularly given that the average duration of untreated psychosis is a year or more. Eligibility criteria regarding IQ are justified from previous experience with CET indicating that individuals with severe mental incapacity are better served with less cognitively advanced programs.

Exclusion Criteria:

In order to avoid confounders likely to affect cognition and limit response to cognitive rehabilitation, we will exclude those with:

  1. significant neurological or medical disorders that may produce cognitive impairment (e.g., seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury);
  2. persistent suicidal or homicidal behavior;
  3. a recent (within the past 3 months) history of substance abuse or dependence; and
  4. any MRI contraindications such as ferromagnetic objects in the body.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Cognitive enhancement therapy
Cognitive Enhancement Therapy (CET) consists of approximately 60 hours of computer-assisted neurocognitive training in attention, memory, and problem-solving; and 45 social-cognitive group sessions that employ in vivo learning experiences to foster the development of social wisdom and success in interpersonal interactions. CET begins with 3 months of weekly 1-hour neurocognitive training in attention, after which patients begin the weekly 1.5-hour social-cognitive groups. Neurocognitive training then proceeds concurrently with the socialcognitive groups
Cognitive Enhancement Therapy (CET) consists of approximately 60 hours of computer-assisted neurocognitive training in attention, memory, and problem-solving; and 45 social-cognitive group sessions that employ in vivo learning experiences to foster the development of social wisdom and success in interpersonal interactions. CET begins with 3 months of weekly 1-hour neurocognitive training in attention, after which patients begin the weekly 1.5-hour social-cognitive groups. Neurocognitive training then proceeds concurrently with the socialcognitive groups.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Enriched Supportive Therapy
Enriched Supportive Therapy is an individual approach that includes the established principles of supportive therapy previously tested by our group, which are "enriched" by selected practice principles from the effective Personal Therapy. These manualized supportive therapeutic practices include active listening, correct empathy, appropriate reassurance, basic psychoeducation, including computer-based educational programs, reinforcement of health-promoting initiatives, the provision of case management, and reliance on the advocacy and advice of the therapist in times of crisis.
Enriched Supportive Therapy is an individual approach that includes the established principles of supportive therapy previously tested by our group, which are "enriched" by selected practice principles from the effective Personal Therapy. These manualized supportive therapeutic practices include active listening, correct empathy, appropriate reassurance, basic psychoeducation, including computer-based educational programs, reinforcement of health-promoting initiatives, the provision of case management, and reliance on the advocacy and advice of the therapist in times of crisis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Confirm the neuroprotective effects of CET on frontal and temporal brain structure
Time Frame: 18 months
Aim #1: Confirm the neuroprotective effects of CET on frontal and temporal brain structure. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments will be collected along with cognitive and functional outcome data at baseline, 9, and 18 months. It is hypothesized that patients treated with CET will demonstrate decreased loss of frontal and temporal gray matter relative to EST, and that this neuroprotection will be a mechanism of cognitive and functional improvement.
18 months
Examine the effects of CET on fronto-temporal brain function.
Time Frame: 18 Months
Aim #2: Examine the effects of CET on fronto-temporal brain function. Functional MRI data using established executive and social cognition paradigms will be collected at baseline, 9, and 18 months along with cognitive and functional outcome data. It is hypothesized that CET patients will demonstrate enhanced fronto-temporal brain activity during these tasks relative to EST (see Section 3C.6.2 for specific predictions), and that this enhanced brain activity will be a mechanism of cognitive and functional improvement.
18 Months
Examine the durability of CET effects on fronto-temporal brain structure and function, cognition, and functional outcome at 1 year post-treatment
Time Frame: 1 year post-treatment
Aim #3: Examine the durability of CET effects on fronto-temporal brain structure and function, cognition, and functional outcome at 1 year post-treatment. Identical neuroimaging, cognitive, and behavioral data will be collected as those assessed during active treatment. It is hypothesized that the differential neurobiologic benefits of CET relative to EST observed in Aims 1 and 2, and the cognitive and functional benefits of CET observed during active treatment will be sustained 1 year post-treatment.
1 year post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Explore the effects of a fronto-temporal structural and functional reserve on CET treatment response.
Time Frame: 18 Months
Exploratory Aim: Explore the effects of a fronto-temporal structural and functional reserve on CET treatment response. Moderator analyses will examine whether pre-treatment fronto-temporal structural and functional brain reserves (operationalized in Section 3C.8.2) predict larger cognitive and functional gains in CET. Exploratory analyses will also examine the degree to which later (18 mo) treatment improvement is dependent upon early (9 mo) neuroprotection and increased brain function, which may reflect plasticity.
18 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matcheri Keshavan, MD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Enhancement Therapy

Subscribe