Use of the Neovasc Coronary Sinus Reducer System for the Treatment of Refractory Angina Pectoris in Patients With Ngina Class 3-4 Who Are Not Candidates for Revascularization (Reducer)

February 1, 2022 updated by: Eli Sprecher, MD, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Use of the Neovasc Coronary Sinus Reducer System for the Treatment of Refractory Angina Pectoris in Patients With Angina Class 3-4 Who Are Not Candidates for Revascularization

The purpose of this study is to implant the Reducer in patients with the symptoms of refractory angina, that suffer from refractory angina who demonstrate reversible ischemia.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

  • Interventional, Allocation: Open label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Diagnosis and treatment for which the device is required:Patients with advanced obstructive coronary artery disease and severe disabling refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy. No revascularization option available.
  • Why this unlicensed device is chosen over a licensed device or conventional therapies for this particular patient? Patient currently treated with optimal medical therapies that include: long acting nitrates, beta blockers, and calcium channel blockers. The patient is not amendable to re-do bypass graft surgery, not amendable to percutaneous coronary intervention, as determined by recent coronary angiography.

There is no other licensed device that can effectively ameliorate refractory angina and reduce the number of angina episodes and improve quality of life.

-The current device has been used in 25 patients to date. Safety information at 6 months had been published (JACC 2007;49:1783). Extended safety and efficacy information at 3 years had been reported in March 2010 (ACC Annual Scientific conference). The device has not been associated with any procedure-related adverse events during the follow-up period.

Risks (theoretical):•Coronary sinus dissection at the time of implantation. •Coronary sinus perforation and acute cardiac tamponade requiring drainage. •Device migration and embolization. •Late coronary sinus occlusion These risk were not reported in patients who receieved the device. Benefits: •Reduce angina severity. •Improve quality of life. •Reduction in the intensity of medical therapy with decrease side effects. •Reduced incidence of hospital admissions, emergency room visits and outpatient clinic visits for refractory angina. •Improved left ventricular function, and reduced LV end diastolic pressure. These patients have poor quality of life. They are disable and unable to work or to perform basic daily activities. Cannulation of the coronary sinus presents procedural risks similar to that of pacemaker electrode insertion, a procedure which is frequently performed in Interventional cardiology. For these particular patients with poor quality of life, the offered technology can potentially make them more active, more productive, and less dependent on medication and the health system.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Tel Aviv, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • Tel Aviv Medical Center
        • Contact:
      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 64239
        • Recruiting
        • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Shmuel Banai, Prof.
          • Phone Number: 972-3-6973395
        • Contact:
          • Gad Keren, Prof.
          • Phone Number: 972-3-6974762

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >18 years old
  • Symptomatic CAD with chronic refractory angina pectoris classified as Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grade III or IV despite attempted optimal medical therapy for thirty days prior to screening
  • Non-candidate for surgical or percutaneous coronary intervention, as determined by 2 independent Professors of Internal medicine
  • Reversible ischemia of the left ventricular wall demonstrated by Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography (Dobutamine ECHO; DSE), or by Thallium Spect

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent (within three months) acute coronary syndrome
  • Recent (within six months) PCI or CABG
  • Unstable angina (recent onset angina, crescendo angina, or rest angina with ECG changes) during the thirty days prior to screening
  • De-compensated congestive heart failure or hospitalization due to CHF during the three months prior to screening
  • Life threatening rhythm disorders or any rhythm disorders that would require placement of an internal defibrillator and or pacemaker
  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as indicated by a forced expiratory volume in one second that is less than 55% of the predicted value
  • Severe valvular heart disease
  • Patient with pacemaker or defibrillator electrode in the right atrium, right ventricle, or coronary sinus
  • Patient having undergone tricuspid valve replacement or repair
  • Known allergy to stainless steel or nickel
  • Patient with anomalous or abnormal CS as demonstrated by angiogram. Abnormality defined as: Abnormal CS anatomy (e.g., tortuosity, aberrant branch, persistent left SVC) and/or; CS diameter at the site of implantation> 12mm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neovasc coronary sinus reducer
open label: Neovasc coronary sinus reducer
reducer
Other Names:
  • Reducer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Score
Time Frame: 6 months
A decrease of two or more Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Score grades from baseline to six-month post-procedural evaluation in Reducer and Control groups
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2030

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 29, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractory Angina

Clinical Trials on Neovac coronary sinus reducer

Subscribe