Self-esteem and Neuro-urological Follow-up in Patients With Spina Bifida or Spinal Cord Injury (ESTIME)

April 13, 2021 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

Analysis of Psychosocial Determinants of Observance of Monitoring Neuro-urological in Spina-bifida Adult Patients and in Spinal Cord Injury Patients: a Prospective, Comparative, Multicenter With Parallel Groups Study

With improved life expectancy over the last fifty years, spina bifida has become a disease of the adult. One of the major stakes for these patients is the preservation of a regular follow-up of uro-nephrologicals risk factors and of a respect for the rules of self management of their neurological bladder.

The main objective of this study is to highlight a difference in the level of global self-esteem among a population of adult patients with spina bifida and a population of adult patients with traumatic spinal cord injury gained the same level of neurological.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

With improved life expectancy over the last fifty years, spina bifida has become a disease of the adult. The risk of developing a terminal renal insufficiency is eight times higher than the risk in the general population and twice as important as in acquired spinal cord injury. This risk continues to evolve with advancing age.

One of the major stakes for these patients is the preservation of a regular follow-up of uro-nephrologicals risk factors and of a respect for the rules of self management of their neurological bladder. However, some studies report that nearly two thirds of these patients are not monitored at regular neuro-urological in the adulthood. Different psychosocial determinants were analyzed as potential markers of the impact of chronic diseases from childhood to adulthood and could account for the disparity of follow-up and access to healthcare. Among these, the self-esteem is a psychological dimension of analysis particularly relevant within the framework of chronic states inherited from the childhood.

The investigators formulate the hypothesis that global self-esteem and lower perceived self-efficacy may be a causal predictive factor of a reduced access to the continence and a lower compliance monitoring in adult patients with a spina bifida.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

111

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Besançon, France, 25000
        • CHU de Besancon
      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Clinique Saint Augustin
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • CHU de Lille
      • Lyon, France, 69000
        • Urologie CH Lyon Sud et Hôpital Henry Gabrielle
      • Marseille, France, 13005
        • APHM - Hôpital de la Conception Service de chirurgie urologique et transplantation rénale
      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • MPR neurologique CHU de Nantes
      • Paris, France, 75000
        • APHP Raymond Poincare
      • Paris, France, 75000
        • APHP Rothschild
      • Paris, France, 75000
        • Neuro-urologie et explorations périnéales, APHP Tenon
      • Ploemeur, France, 56270
        • Centre Mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation Fonctionnelles de Kerpape
      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • CHU de Rennes CR Spina bifida
      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • Hopital Pontchaillou - CHU de Rennes
      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • MPR St Hélier
      • Rouen, France, 76000
        • Urologie, CHU de Rouen
      • Toulouse, France, 31000
        • MPR CHU Rangueuil
      • Toulouse, France, 31000
        • Urologie CHU Rangueuil Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient seen in university hospitals or in rehabilitation clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a spina bifida aperta or an acquired traumatic spinal cord injury dating more than two years, the level of injury being below D12 and higher S1 (Score ASIA A).
  • Age between 18 and 60
  • Knowing how to read, write, count
  • Having given their free, informed and in writing consent (an information is also given to the reliable person when it exists)
  • Affiliated to the National Health Service

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric history requiring an hospitalization in a specialized unit during more than two months
  • Score MMS lower than 27 ( GRECO version)
  • Serious associated pathology or associated pathology which could interfer with the management of vesico-sphincteral disorders
  • Neurosurgery, dating from less than one year
  • Symptoms of dysfunction of ventricular bypass valve at the time of inclusion
  • Clinical epileptic attack within six months prior to inclusion
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Simultaneous inclusion in an another therapeutic protocol or period of exclusion from an another protocol
  • Traumatic spinal cord injury acquired before age 16

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Spina bifida aperta
Acquired traumatic spinal cord injury

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure of the global self-esteem by the Rosenberg scale (RSES)
Time Frame: At day 0
Score range : 10 - 40. High scores indicate hight self esteem.
At day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of depression and anxiety by Hamilton's scale (HAD)
Time Frame: At day 0, at month 6
Score range : 0 - 21. High scores indicate a hight level of symptoms.
At day 0, at month 6
Neuropsychological evaluation (WAIS-III battery composite GREFEX, CVLT)
Time Frame: At day 0
Battery of test exploring executives functions. High scores indicate high level of executive functions.
At day 0
Rating Scale vesico-sphincter and anorectal function (ISCOS)
Time Frame: At day 0, at month 6
High scores indicate high vesico-sphincter and anorectal dysfunction
At day 0, at month 6
Evaluation scale for the achievement of self catheterizing
Time Frame: At day 0, at month 6
14 binary items
At day 0, at month 6
Scale functional mobility and transfers (SCIM III)
Time Frame: At day 0

The SCIM is a disability scale in order to describe patients' ability to accomplish activities of daily living and to make functional assessments of this population more sensitive to changes.

SCIM-III is comprised of 19 items in 3 subscales, which are:

(i) self-care (sub-score 0-20); (ii) respiration and sphincter management (sub-score 0-40); (iii) mobility (sub-score 0-40). The mobility subscale is further sub-divided to assess mobility "in room and toilet" and for "indoors and outdoors, on an even surface".

The total score ranges from 0 to 100.

At day 0
Measure of the global self-esteem by the Rosenberg scale (RSES)
Time Frame: At month 6
Score range : 10 - 40. High scores indicate hight self esteem.
At month 6
Observance of the appointment
Time Frame: At month 6
At month 6
Observance of holding of the mictionnel catalog
Time Frame: At month 6
At month 6
Measure of auto-efficiency experienced scale for Medullary Injured (MSES)
Time Frame: At Day 0
  • 16 items ranging from 1 to 7
  • Range 16 - 112
  • High scores correspond to low level of percieved auto-efficiency
At Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jacques Kerdraon, MD, CHU Rennes
  • Study Chair: Reymann Jean Michel, PhD, Rennes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 12, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

May 28, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spina Bifida Aperta

Subscribe