Developing and Testing an Implementation Strategy to Improve Perioperative Diabetes Care

August 26, 2019 updated by: Marlies Hulscher, Radboud University Medical Center

Perioperative Diabetes Care: Developing and Testing an Implementation Strategy in Terms of Effectiveness, Experiences and Costs

Optimising glycaemic control during hospital stay reduces the rate of infections, length of stay and mortality, in particular in surgical patients. In this study, we test a strategy to implement optimal perioperative diabetes care in a controlled before and after design in 6 Dutch hospitals.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVE/RESEARCH QUESTION Optimising glycaemic control during hospital stay reduces rate of infections, length of stay and mortality,in particular in surgical patients. In guidelines and literature recommendations on optimal perioperative diabetes care are described. Nevertheless, in daily practice, perioperative glycaemic control is very often not achieved. This study aims at developing an implementation strategy that is tested on feasibility to improve perioperative diabetes care in terms of effectiveness, experiences and costs.

DESIGN/OUTCOME MEASURES/IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY A step-wise implementation model is applied: 1) recommendations on optimal perioperative diabetes care (e.g. the administration of intravenous insulin, encouragement of diabetes self-management) are systematically translated into quality indicators; 2a) using these quality indicators, current care is measured by performing a medical record search among 400 patients in 6 hospitals; 2b) barriers and facilitators for optimal care are measured by performing interviews with professionals and, e.g. regarding self-management, with patients; 3) based on this information an implementation strategy is developed;4) implementation activities are enacted and 5) evaluated in a controlled before-after design in 6 hospitals providing before and after intervention 400 patients.

DATA ANALYSIS To obtain an indication of the effectiveness of the strategy, baseline and post intervention outcomes of intervention hospitals are compared with outcomes in control hospitals, using the quality indicators. Experiences of participants in the intervention hospitals will be measured to, if necessary, adapt the strategy to make it more effective and acceptable.

ECONOMIC EVALUATION A cost analysis of the implementation strategy will take place. Implementation costs will be related to the difference in percentage of patients treated as described in the quality indicators before and after implementation. Information on the costs and effects at the patient level will also be compared before and after the implementation of the recommendations on optimal care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

811

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6500 HB
        • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes mellitus AND
  • Cardiac surgery OR
  • Abdominal surgery OR
  • Large joint orthopedic surgery And
  • Duration of surgery minimum one hour

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rejection to participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Tailored improvement strategy
In 3 hospitals a tailored strategy to improve perioperative diabetes care is performed

A step-wise implementation model is applied:

1) recommendations on optimal perioperative diabetes care (e.g. the administration of intravenous insulin, encouragement of diabetes self-management) are systematically translated into quality indicators; 2a) using these quality indicators, current care is measured by performing a medical record search among 400 patients in 6 hospitals; 2b) barriers and facilitators for optimal care are measured by performing interviews with professionals 3) based on this information an implementation strategy is developed; 4) implementation activities are enacted in 3 hospitals and 5) evaluated in a controlled before-after design in 6 hospitals providing before and after intervention 400 patients.

NO_INTERVENTION: Usual perioperative diabetes care
Three hospitals that provide usual perioperative diabetes care serve as control hospitals

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Current care study
Time Frame: 1 year

the primary outcome measure is the adherence to the quality indicators (derived from international guidelines and scientific literature)

Baseline measurement

1 year
Feasibility study
Time Frame: 1 year

the primary outcome measure regarding effectiveness is the adherence to developed quality indicators

baseline measurement and follow up measurement following improvement intervention

1 year
Barrier analysis
Time Frame: 1 year

the primary outcomes in the barrier analysis are the barriers and facilitators among professionals regarding adherence to the quality indicators

interview study

1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
current care study
Time Frame: 1 year
the secondary outcome measure is the outcome of care (e.g. glycemic control) before intervention data
1 year
feasibility study
Time Frame: 1 year

the secondary outcome measure is the outcome of care (e.g. glycemic control) before and after data

the secondary outcome measures are the experiences of professionals and patients with different elements of the implementation strategy and the changed care, and the cost of the tested strategy

1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marlies Hulscher, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 4, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Tailored improvement strategy

3
Subscribe