Nutrition, Exercise, and Wellness Treatment (NEW Tx) for Bipolar Disorder (NEW Tx)

May 2, 2018 updated by: Louisa Grandin Sylvia, Massachusetts General Hospital
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in bipolar disorder, yet no empirically validated psychosocial interventions to manage risk factors for CVD in BD have been developed. The purpose of this study is to develop and test the feasibility of an integrated treatment to decrease CVD risk factors, while exploring whether the intervention improves overall functioning and mood symptoms. The designed treatment integrates theories on Nutrition strategies, Exercise interventions, and Wellness Treatment (NEW Tx) to address risk factors for CVD that co-occur with bipolar disorder. NEW Tx includes novel intervention strategies in each of these three modules, as well as modified and tailored empirically-supported strategies for bipolar disorder. The primary hypotheses are that NEW Tx will be feasible to deliver, acceptable to this population, and associated with improvements in CVD risk factors (i.e., waist circumference). Exploratory analyses will examine predictors of treatment response and the effect of NEW Tx on mood symptoms and overall functioning.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of the Nutrition, Exercise, and Wellness Treatment (NEW Tx) research is to develop and test the feasibility and acceptance of a theoretically integrated treatment to address the impact of medical comorbidity of individuals with bipolar disorder (BD), while exploring its efficacy, whether it improves overall functioning and symptoms, as well as examine a potential moderator and mediator of treatment response.

A.Primary Aims

Aim 1: Feasibility and Acceptance of NEW Tx in the Nonrandomized Trial.

Hypothesis 1a: A preliminary study of whether NEW Tx will be feasible with regards to recruitment, retention, blinded assessments, and therapist adherence to NEW Tx.

Hypothesis 1b: Participants will report high satisfaction with the treatment and acceptability over the study duration in a nonrandomized trial.

Aim 2: Feasibility and Acceptance of NEW Tx and its Evaluation in the Randomized Pilot Trial.

Hypothesis 2a: A pilot study of whether NEW Tx will be feasible with regards to recruitment, randomization, retention, blinded assessments, and therapist adherence to NEW Tx.

Hypothesis 2b: Participants will report high satisfaction with the treatment and acceptability over the study duration in the randomized pilot trial.

B. Exploratory Aims

Aim 3a: Reducing Medical Burden in the Randomized Pilot Trial. Pilot test the efficacy of NEW Tx in improving medical burden using the Framingham Risk Score (FRS).

Hypothesis 3a: Over the course of 20-weeks (18 sessions) the NEW Tx group will have a lower FRS compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in the randomized pilot trial.

Aim 3b: Symptoms and Functioning in the Randomized Pilot Trial. Examine the efficacy of NEW Tx in improving functioning and symptoms of BD.

Hypothesis 3b: Over the course of 20-weeks (18 sessions) the NEW Tx group will improved functioning and mood symptoms compared to TAU in the randomized pilot trial.

Aim 3c: Moderator and Mediator of NEW Tx in the Randomized Pilot Trial. Investigate a potential moderator and mediator of treatment response.

Hypothesis 3c.1: Individuals with higher baseline Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30 will moderate the between treatment effect size for medical burden (FRS) in the randomized pilot trial, such that of NEW Tx will have lower FRSs.

Hypothesis 3c.2: Mastery of the diet and exercise modules of NEW Tx will mediate the association of NEW Tx and improvement in medical burden (FRS).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder (Type I or II), which is the primary focus of treatment
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Currently ill (CGI-BP ≥ 3)
  • Age > 18 years and < 65 years
  • Overweight individuals (BMI > 25)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling/unable to comply with study procedures
  • Endorsed item, confirmed by patient's physician, on the PAR-Q
  • Euthymic (CGI-BP < 3)
  • Diagnosis of an eating disorder (e.g., anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa) in the past month
  • Diagnosis of substance dependence in the past month
  • Active suicidality (MADRS item 9 score > 4)
  • Pregnant (as analyzed by a urine pregnancy test)
  • Currently receiving another psychosocial treatment
  • Exercising regularly (i.e., 5 days per week for 30 min)
  • Neurologic disorder or history of head trauma
  • Contraindications to exercise or diet interventions (e.g., co-morbid nutritional and metabolic diseases, physical injuries)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NEW Tx
25 people will be randomized to NEW Tx, a weekly individualized psychotherapy. Therapy is 20 weeks long.
NEW Tx is a flexible modular treatment such that modules are selected based on the needs of the individual to increase its generalizability across patients, settings, and providers as well as its acceptability to patients.
Active Comparator: Treatment as usual (TAU)
25 people will be randomized to TAU and will meet with their psychiatrist as often as clinically needed over the 20 week study duration.
Pharmacotherapy will be conducted by experts in BD treatment and will follow the empirically-supported treatment algorithm for BD that has been developed and recently revised. The foundation of TAU is to maintain treatment with at least one Food and Drug Administration approved mood stabilizer. For TAU, medication and dosage changes are allowed as needed as long as the change is recommended based on the guidelines and participants remain on a mood stabilizer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NEW Tx Scale
Time Frame: 20 weeks
NEW Tx Scale is a 10-item scale to asses participants' expectations of NEW Tx their acceptability of NEW Tx at Week 20. This scale also includes a comments section to solicit unstructured feedback from participants on NEW Tx. The scale for this item is a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly agree") to 5 ("strongly disagree"). The score for each item is summed for a total score that ranges from 10 to 50 with higher scores indicating poorer perception of the treatment. TAU participants only received this questionnaire if they chose to participate in the NEW Tx at week 20 of the intervention following the waitlist period.
20 weeks
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 is a reliable and valid self-report of participants' acceptability of treatment. This is an assessment of client/patient satisfaction with their care and perceived quality and tolerability of NEW Tx. The scale for this item is a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("poor") to 4 ("excellent"). The score for each item is summed for a total score that ranges from 8 to 32 with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of the treatment.TAU participants only received this questionnaire if they chose to participate in the NEW Tx at week 20 of the intervention following the waitlist period.
20 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LIFE- Range of Impaired Functioning Tool
Time Frame: 20 weeks
LIFE- Range of Impaired Functioning Tool assesses the extent to which medical burden has impacted current functioning. The score for each domain is summed for a total score that ranges from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating worse functioning.
20 weeks
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale is a 10-item clinician-rated measure of depression that assesses the presence and severity of patient's current depressive symptoms. The score for each item is summed for a total score that ranges from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more severe current depressive symptoms.
20 weeks
Young Mania Rating Scale
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Young Mania Rating Scale is an 11-item, clinician-rated measure that assesses the presence and severity of patient's current symptoms of mania. The score for each item is summed for a total score that ranges from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating more severe current manic symptoms.
20 weeks
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Body Mass Index levels at post-treatment.
20 weeks
Weekly Exercise Duration
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Weekly exercise duration reported at post-treatment.
20 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 8, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • K23MH091182-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bipolar Disorder

Clinical Trials on Nutrition, Exercise, and Wellness (NEW) psychotherapy

Subscribe