A Study Comparing Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block to Single Shot Sciatic Nerve Block

June 29, 2016 updated by: Antoun Nader, Northwestern University

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block to Single Shot Sciatic Nerve Block

The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of postoperative symptoms of neurologic injury after a single shot infragluteal-parabiceps sciatic nerve block versus a continuous infragluteal-parabiceps sciatic nerve catheter.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

There are a limited number of prospective studies in the literature examining the risk of neurologic injury and symptoms after sciatic nerve blocks. The incidence of transient neurological symptoms after a continuous catheter is not well reported.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients ( ≥18 and ≤ 80) who are scheduled to undergo elective scheduled foot surgery and agreed to receive a sciatic nerve catheter as a part of their postoperative pain management. this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of hemostatic abnormalities
  • chronic pain syndrome
  • a foot deformity restricting normal foot movement
  • severe liver or renal disease
  • a preexisting neurologic disorder
  • patient refusal to participate
  • the presence of language barrier that prohibits proper communication with patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Single Shot Sciatic Nerve Block
Single shot sciatic nerve blocks will be performed by resident trainees supervised by faculty. Bupivacaine 0.625% with epinephrine 1:300,000 will be injected incrementally in 3-ml aliquots to a total volume of 0.4 ml/kg (minimum, 20 ml; maximum, 35 ml).
Bupivacaine 0.625% with epinephrine 1:300,000
Other Names:
  • Sensorcaine
Active Comparator: Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block
Continuous sciatic nerve block catheters will be performed using an insulated needle connected to the negative lead of a constant current nerve stimulator. The catheter will be advanced under ultrasound guidance. A test dose of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine will be injected to confirm catheter placement. All subjects will receive a portable pump that will infuse 0.2% ropivacaine 5 ml/hr with a 5 ml bolus/hr. The subjects will follow standard protocol discharge instructions in regards to removing the catheter themselves.
0.2% ropivacaine 5 ml/hr with a 5 ml bolus/hr.
Other Names:
  • Naropin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Temporary Neurologic Symptoms Between Groups
Time Frame: 1 month
Temporary neurologic symptoms between groups; muscle weakness of either foot dorsiflexion and plantar flexion
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant Satisfaction With Anesthesia
Time Frame: 24 hours
Patient satisfaction on a 0 to 10 scale with 0 equals completely dissatisfied and 10 equals completely satisfied
24 hours
Pain Control
Time Frame: 72 hrs
Numeric rating score for pain (NRS) 0 to 10 scale where 0 equals no pain and 10 equals the worst pain imaginable
72 hrs

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antoun Nader, MD, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fracture of Foot

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

Subscribe