- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01623739
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants (Type 1) and Early Placed Implants (Type 2)
The investigators are asking subjects to take part in a research study of soft tissue (gums) and bone (jawbone) healing around dental implants following tooth extraction. The investigators want to compare how the gums and the bone changes shape with healing in two different scenarios:
- When the implant is placed at the same time the tooth is extracted.
- When the tooth is extracted and then left to heal for a period of 4 to 8 weeks before the implant is placed.
Previous studies have shown that both methods work and can give good results. In fact the two methods are used routinely as part of standard care but it is not known if the two procedures are equally good since they have never been compared in one same research study.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This controlled, randomized clinical trial (RCT) is designed to compare soft and hard tissue dimensional changes for two commonly used approaches for replacing a recently extracted tooth by means of a dental implant, i.e. immediate implant placement (Type 1) or early implant placement (Type 2). Additionally, this study will evaluate the association between the osseous anatomy and implant position with soft and hard tissue changes.
Extraction sites will include maxillary and mandibular anterior and premolar teeth having intact adjacent teeth. Implants placed for this study will be SLA surface, bone level design, Straumann BL RC (Bone Level Regular Cross-fit ) 4.1mm or BL NC (Bone Level Narrow Cross-fit ) 3.3mm diameter implants at 8, 10, 12 or 14mm in length.
Immediate implant placement (Type 1) resulting in a horizontal defect dimension (HDD) will receive bone grafting, using freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA)(Straumann Allograft GC®) and will be covered by a resorbable membrane (BioGide®).
For the implants randomized to type 2 implant placement, the extraction socket will be filled with a collagen plug and allowed to heal for 4 to 8 weeks before the implant will be placed. Simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) will be performed using FDBA (Straumann Allograft GC®)and a resorbable collagen membrane (BioGide®). The type 2 implant placement procedure will follow the guidelines as described by Buser et al. (2008).
All implant placement will follow standard protocols utilizing tapping and placement according to the manufacturer's guidelines.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
- Graduate Periodontics, Dental School, UTHSCSA
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient is 18 years or older.
- Ability to understand and provide informed consent before starting the study.
- Ability and willingness to comply with all study requirements.
- The patient, if of child-bearing potential, has a negative urine pregnancy test.
- Adequate oral hygiene to allow for implant therapy consistent with standards of care.
- Adequate bone volume to accommodate the planned endosseous dental implant placement following immediate placement protocols utilizing Straumann Bone Level implants RC 4.1mm or Bone Level Implant NC 3.3 mm at 8, 10, 12 or 14 mm in length.
- One or more teeth in either the maxilla or mandible anterior or premolar areas requiring extraction leading to a single-tooth gap requiring implant placement as determined by the patient's dental provider.
- Following extraction, surgical site anatomy presents conditions allowing immediate implant placement.
- Primary stability of implant consistent with standards of care is achieved at the time of placement.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient reports current smoking habit with moderate or heavy smoking (more than 10 cigarettes per day) or tobacco chewing use.
- History of alcoholism or drug abuse within the past 5 years.
- Severe bruxism or clenching habits.
- Patient has significant untreated periodontal disease (grade III or IV), caries, or clinical or radiographic signs of infection within two adjacent tooth positions of implant area.
- History of HIV infection, Hepatitis B or C.
- Patients with a history of systemic disease that precludes standard dental implant therapy or alters daily activities to a level consistent with ASA III classification (including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, metabolic, neurologic, pulmonary, endocrine, autoimmune, or psychiatric disorders).
- Presence of local inflammation or mucosal diseases such as lichen planus
- Patient history consistent with high risk for subacute bacterial endocarditis
- Current hematological disorder or coumadin (or similar) therapy
- Patient has a disease that affects bone metabolism, such as but not limited to osteoporosis, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, congenital connective tissue disorders (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta), or Paget's disease.
- Patient is taking medications or having treatments known to have an effect on bone turnover, including: thiazide diuretics, calcitonin, systemic steroids, bisphosphonates, vitamin D (>800 IU/day), estrogen or progesterone therapy.
- Current steroid treatment: defined as any person who within the last two years has received for two weeks a dose equivalent to 20 mg hydrocortisone
- Patient currently undergoing chemotherapy
- Patient history of radiation treatment to the head or neck
- Physical or mental handicaps that would interfere with patient's ability to exercise good oral hygiene on a regular basis
- Use of any investigational drug or device within the 30 day period immediately prior to implant surgery
- Patient is pregnant
- Extraction sites having anatomic conditions that preclude immediate implant placement.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Type 1 implant placement
Placement of a dental implant: Implant is placed immediately following tooth extraction in one surgical procedure
|
Type 1 implant placement Type 2 implant placement
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Type 2 implant placement
Placement of a dental implant: Once the tooth is extracted.
The site is left to heal for 4 to 8 weeks before a dental implant is placed during a second surgical procedure.
|
Type 1 implant placement Type 2 implant placement
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mid Facial Mucosal Level at Implant Site
Time Frame: 3 months after crown delivery
|
Baseline will be at the time of crown delivery.
Thereafter, the mid facial mucosal level at implant site will be recorded at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery.
|
3 months after crown delivery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PES/WES (Pink Esthetic Score, White Esthetic Score).
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
|
The PES and WES scales are 10 point scales, made up of 5 categories, each with a 2 point value.
Each category is scored out of 2, and the scores totaled to give an optimal score out of 10.
Any score of 6 or higher out of 10 would be considered a good clinical outcome.
the PES categories focus on the gum area, and the WES categories focus on the tooth.
The scores for PES and WES are totaled, to give a score out of 20, with 20 being the highest possible score (best outcome).
The values are totaled and a mean score of all the readings is reported.
|
3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
|
|
Probing Depth
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
|
The measurement of the pocket around the implanted tooth, measured with a graduated probe.
A healthy pocket depth is around 3mm with no bleeding during the measurement process.
The values are totaled and a mean score of all the readings is reported.
|
3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
|
|
Modified Plaque Index
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
|
Measurement of amount of plaque build-up on teeth, using a scale of 0 (no plaque detection), to 3 (an abundance of soft matter).
The scores are totaled and a mean score reported.
|
3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
|
|
Modified Bleeding Index
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
|
Bleeding from the gums is measured on probing the gum and measured on scale of 0 to 5, with 0 being the best outcome, with no bleeding, and 5 being the worst outcome, with spontaneous bleeding.
The scores are totaled and a mean score reported.
|
3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
|
|
Radiographic Bone Level
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after baseline
|
Secondary outcome measures will be recorded at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery.
|
Up to 5 years after baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Guy Huynh-Ba, DDS, MS, UTHSCSA Department of Periodontics
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ITI 689_2010
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
-
October 6 UniversityNot yet recruitingPartially Edentulous Jaw
-
Institut Straumann AGRecruitingTooth Loss | Dental Implant | Partially Edentulous JawNetherlands, Belgium, Italy, Switzerland
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompletedPartially Edentulous JawChina
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamZimmer DentalCompleted
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompletedPartially Edentulous JawChina
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompletedPartially Edentulous JawChina
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompleted
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompleted
-
NeodentActive, not recruiting
-
University of MichiganTerminatedJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyUnited States
Clinical Trials on Placement of a dental implant
-
Gulf Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingTooth Loss | Peri-implant Bone Loss | EdentulismUnited Arab Emirates
-
Hospital General Universitario Morales MeseguerNot yet recruiting
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityCompletedDental Implants | Cold Atmospheric PlasmaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of BarcelonaBioHorizons, Inc.Unknown
-
Università Vita-Salute San RaffaeleCompleted
-
Aula Dental AvanzadaActive, not recruiting
-
Aula Dental AvanzadaMozo Grau TicareRecruitingBone Resorption | Dental ImplantSpain
-
PerioCentrum ResearchUnknownImplant Geometry, Osseointegration, Soft Tissue Volume, Marginal Bone Levels, Soft Tissue Recession, Volumetric AnalysisSpain
-
UConn HealthDentsply Astra techCompletedImplant Survival Using Immediate Loading ProtocolUnited States
-
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & HospitalCompleted