Controlled Trial to Reduce Secondhand Smoke Exposure at Homes in Armenia

June 27, 2012 updated by: Frances Stillman, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Monitoring Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Buildings in Armenia: Controlled Trial

This study was designed to test the hypothesis whether a novel intervention that uses motivational interviewing along with immediate feedback and follow-up counseling calls is effective in educating the household members about the health hazards of smoking and secondhand smoke exposure and reducing children exposure to secondhand smoke at households in Armenia.

The study was a randomized control trial with two arms: intervention and control groups.

The sample population for the study included households with a non-smoking mother and at least one child 2 to 6 years of age residing with at least one daily smoker. The study team recruited the households through pediatrician's offices in polyclinics (primary healthcare facilities) utilizing multistage random sampling. Trained interviewers made two baseline (one week apart) and two 4-month follow-up household visits to conduct measurements, interviews and intervention. Measurements included surveys, air nicotine monitoring in homes and hair samples from children to assess changes in nicotine concentration over time.

SHS concentration was estimated by sampling vapor-phase nicotine using a filter badge treated with sodium bisulfate. Airborne nicotine monitors were used in all homes to measure SHS concentration at baseline and 4 month follow-up. At least one monitor was used in each home, preferably in the main room in which the family congregates.

Personal exposure to SHS in 2-6 years old children was assessed using biological samples of hair. A small sample of hair (approximately 30 - 50 strands, 2-3 cm) was cut near the hair root from the back of the scalp where there is the most uniform growth pattern between individuals which minimizes the variability of the results.

The intervention included an in-person counseling session with distribution of a tailored educational brochure and demonstration/feedback measurement of indoor PM2.5 (at second baseline visit); it also included one and two months follow-up counseling calls. The control group received only a brief educational leaflet on the hazards of second-hand smoke exposure.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Yerevan, Armenia, 0019
        • College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least one child 2 to 6 years of age
  • Non-smoking mother
  • At least one daily smoker
  • Child's exposed to second smoke of at least 1 cigarette per day

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mother's pregnancy
  • Child's hair less than 2 cm in length after stretching out
  • Residing out of Yerevan

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
The interventionist provided in person counseling on eliminating child exposure to tobacco smoke to at least one daily smoker and a non-smoker mother in the household. The counseling session emphasized the following issues: a) importance of healthy environment at home, b) health dangers of smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke, c) why and how to quit smoking, and d) how to keep home air smoke-free.
The study team measured the particulate matter (PM2.5) in the air using the TSI AM 510 Aerosol SidePak to compare the quality of indoor air with outdoor air and demonstrate the effect of smoking on indoor air quality in the intervention households. After completing the Side Pack PM2.5 measurement, the interventionist immediately downloaded the data to a laptop to visualize the results through graphical presentation of the PM2.5 fluctuations to family members.
Interventionists made two follow-up counseling calls to the primary contact in the intervention households, usually a non-smoking mother at one and two months after the in-person counseling session. These calls aimed at a) assessing the progress in meeting the goals set earlier, b) counseling on barriers to the change, and c) encouraging study participants to maintain the success or to set new goals. These calls also provided opportunity for the participants to ask questions or clarify issues

The intervention group families received the tailored and culturally adjusted educational brochure developed by the study team.

The control group received a brief educational leaflet on the hazards of SHS developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency.

Active Comparator: Control group

The intervention group families received the tailored and culturally adjusted educational brochure developed by the study team.

The control group received a brief educational leaflet on the hazards of SHS developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
change in child's hair nicotine concentration
Time Frame: baseline and 4-month follow-up
baseline and 4-month follow-up
change in air nicotine concentration
Time Frame: baseline and 4-month follow-up
baseline and 4-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
change in the respondents' knowledge on hazards of smoking and secondhand smoke
Time Frame: baseline and 4-month follow-up
baseline and 4-month follow-up
change in frequency of smoking in the presence of the child
Time Frame: baseline and 4-month follow-up
baseline and 4-month follow-up
change in household smoking restrictions
Time Frame: baseline and 4-month follow-up
baseline and 4-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frances A Stillman, Ed.D, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 28, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 28, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB 00002501

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tobacco Use and Smoking Behavior

Clinical Trials on in-person counseling

Subscribe