Medical Economics of Urinary PCA3 Test for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

February 2, 2022 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

The ultrasound-guided biopsies of the prostate is the validated technique for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, the first human cancer and second leading cause of cancer death. Overall, in more than half of cases, prostate biopsies performed in search of a prostate cancer are negative. In this population, there is no consensus recommendation on how to care, leading to repeated invasive biopsies, potential sources of complications.

The PCA3 urine test (ProgensaTM, GenProbe) is an innovative diagnostic tool to predict the positivity of prostate biopsies, especially in patients who had at least one negative biopsy. Proposed in clinical practice in France as a commercial kit, it is expensive and is not covered by health insurance. It is therefore essential to assess the medical and economic impact of its introduction into medical practice.

The investigators propose to set up a study of high standard of proof, multicenter, based on recruitment of patients treated in hospitals. This working hypothesis is that the availability of the PCA3 test results would reduce the number of invasive biopsies performed incorrectly in patients already had at least one negative biopsy, thus improving the diagnostic strategy of prostate cancer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

962

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Angers, France, 49933
        • CHU Angers
      • Contamine-sur-Arve, France
        • Centre hospitalier Alpes Léman
      • Dijon, France, 21079
        • Hôpital du Bocage
      • Lyon, France
        • Hopital Edouard Herriot
      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Hôpital Tenon
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière,
      • Pierre Benite, France, 69495
        • Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud
      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • Hopital de la Milétrie
      • Thonon Les Bains, France
        • Centre hospitalier de Thonon les bains
      • Valence, France
        • Centre Hospitalier de Valence

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients ≥ 18 year-old
  • patients who undergo prostate biopsy for increased serum PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal examination
  • patients who gave informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no informed consent
  • medical history of or current significant prostate cancer
  • medical history of or current extra-prostatic cancer
  • high risk of loss of follow-up
  • clinically obvious prostate cancer (clinical stage ≥ T3, PSA ≥ 50 ng/ml, lymph node involvement, osteolytic bone metastases)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Results of urinary PCA3 test will be available
In this arm, physicians will have knowledge of urinary PCA3 test results. How they subsequently manage patients with prostate cancer suspicion is likely to be influenced by urinary PCA3 test results
urinary PCA3 test will be performed in patients before they undergo prostate biopsy for increased serum PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. Patients with negative biopsies will be definitively enrolled in the study. The physician in charge will have knowledge of PCA3 test results and will be asked to determine the subsequent follow-up taking these results into account.
Active Comparator: Results of urinary PCA3 test will not be available
In this arm, physicians will not have knowledge of urinary PCA3 test results. How they subsequently manage patients with prostate cancer suspicion will therefore not be influenced by urinary PCA3 test results
urinary PCA3 test will be performed in patients before they undergo prostate biopsy for increased serum PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. Patients with negative biopsies will be definitively enrolled in the study. The physician in charge will have knowledge of PCA3 test results and will be asked to determine the subsequent follow-up taking these results into account.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who inappropriately underwent prostate biopsies (negative biopsy: no cancer) at end point
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medical impact of availability of PCA3 test results
Time Frame: 12 months
To determine whether availability of PCA3 test results influences patient management in terms of physical examinations, , PSA testing, prostate ultrasonography, prostate MRI and delay in performing these tests
12 months
Diagnostic performances of urinary PCA3 test
Time Frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Intrinsic performances of PCA3 test in predicting prostate biopsy results in term of sensitivity, specificity and area under ROC curves
12, 24 and 60 months
Cost-efficiency study
Time Frame: 24 months
To determine how availability of PCA3 test results alters medical economics when managing patients with prostate cancer suspicion
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 2, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 3, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe