Correction of Metabolic Acidosis in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) (UBI)

September 17, 2014 updated by: Dr Biagio Di Iorio, Azienda Sanitaria ASL Avellino 2

A Prospective, Controlled, Randomized, Multicentric Study: Correction of Metabolic Acidosis With Use of Bicarbonate in Chronic Renal Insufficiency (CKD3b-4)

The investigators want to evaluate whether an original action based on the administration of alkali (mainly sodium bicarbonate) is able to significantly modify renal death and to reduce mortality due to cardiovascular events.

Methods: This is a proposal of Multicentric, prospective, cohort, randomized, open-label and controlled study.

The investigators will Randomize 728 patients with Chronic Kidney Disease(CKD) stage 3b (CKD-3b) and CKD stage 4: 364 of these patients will be included in the study group called Bicarbonate Group (Bic), in which levels of bicarbonate should be kept > 24 mEq/l; the other 364 patients will included in the Usual Treatment Group (no-Bic).

Results: The aim of the Research Protocol is to demonstrate if that the optimal correction of uremic acidosis (with administration of sodium bicarbonate or of any other alkalinizing agent, e.g. sodium citrate) reduces renal and cardiovascular mortality.

Conclusions. In conclusion the Work Group of the Conservative Therapy for Chronic Renal Insufficiency proposes this cohort, randomized, controlled, prospective, multicentric study to evaluate the effects of correction of acidosis on the progression of the kidney disease considered as renal death in End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rationale:

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is associated with a high incidence of morbility and mortality.

In this regard, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NANHES) shows that 19% of the uremic population presents metabolic acidosis (CKD stage 4). This high prevalence and the low costs of the correction by bicarbonate pave the way for a potential and interesting research activity.

In fact, a Cochrane Collaboration review reports that there is no evidence for correction of acidosis by sodium bicarbonate in pre-End-Stage Renal Disease) (ESRD) patients, and concludes that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are necessary to evaluate the benefits and harms of correcting metabolic acidosis in pre-ESRD patients.

During the same year, 2009, another RCT appears in the scientific literature showing that the administration of sodium bicarbonate, and the consequent correction of acidosis, slows the progression of CKD and improves the nutritional status in ESRD patients stages 4-5. This study was randomized, prospective, open-label, monocentric, and was conducted on 134 patients.

It is well known that acidosis stimulates proteic catabolism, accelerates branched-chain amino acid oxidation and reduces the synthesis of visceral proteins. The beneficial effects of bicarbonate in experimental models in rats and the effects of correcting acidosis on the nutritional status are also known.

Less information is available on the possibility that correcting acidosis in pre-ESRD patients slows renal death and improves outcomes also in the future, on dialysis.

The above cited study of Brito and Ashurst highlights that bicarbonate supplementation (that causes the blood value to increase from 20 to 22 mmol/L) slows the rate of progression of CKD and betters the nutritional status of patients.

Moreover, very recently the author Menon has demonstrated that low levels of serum bicarbonate increase the risk of outcomes, e.g. renal death and mortality.

Finally, an article recently published on Kidney International has put in evidence the pathogenetic factors, e.g. endothelin and hyperaldosteronism, which were caused to worsen renal function in rats by the presence of metabolic acidosis.

In response to this article, an editorial by the authors Sahni, Rosa and Batlle D. has been published on the same issue of Kidney International with the following statement:

"There is increasing evidence that alkali therapy can retard progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We summarize recent studies and discuss a mechanism whereby alkali therapy may neutralize acid production associated with typical Western diets, which generate acid. We emphasize the rationale for using alkali therapy early in the course of CKD, even in the absence of overt metabolic acidosis, and we urge the pharmaceutical industry to develop palatable alkali- containing solutions."

Proposal for the study For the reasons explained above, the Work Group of the Conservative Therapy for Chronic Renal Insufficiency proposes this cohort, randomized, controlled, prospective, multicentric study to evaluate the effects of correction of acidosis on the progression of the kidney disease considered as renal death in ESRD patients.

Objectives:

Main objective:

  1. To evaluate whether an original action based on the administration of alkali (mainly sodium bicarbonate) is able to significantly modify progression of renal disease, and renal death, and to reduce mortality due to cardiovascular events.
  2. To verify if bicarbonate therapy modify progression of renal disease, and renal death, and to reduce mortality due to cardiovascular events in APKD patients.
  3. To verify if bicarbonate therapy modify progression of renal disease, and renal death, and to reduce mortality due to cardiovascular events in dianetic patients.

Other objectives:

To evaluate if nutritional parameters improve during the period of study; To evaluate blood pressure (as absolute value and as increase in antihypertensive drugs); To evaluate how the correction of acidosis influences bone turnover (vascular calcifications); To evaluate changes in calcium and phosphorus metabolism.

Study design Multicentric, prospective, cohort, randomized and controlled study.

Randomize 728 patients with CKD-3b and CKD-4: 364 of these patients will be included in the study group called Bicarbonate Group (Bic), in which levels of bicarbonate should be kept > 24 mEq/l; the other 364 patients will included in the Usual Treatment Group (no-Bic).

Run-in period with one visit per month for 3 months, followed by a 36-month study period.

The investigated patients must be randomized by sex, diabetes and level of renal function (measured Clearance of Creatinine between 60 and 30 ml/min, between 30 and 15, <15 on pre-dialysis) and all the requirements for a Best Practice Treatment (BPT) must be applied:

  • For anemia (Hb 11-12 g/dl; TSAT > 20 %),
  • For arterial hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) <130 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mm g),
  • For hyperlipidemia (low-density (LDL) cholesterol <100),
  • For osteodystrophy (phosphatemia 2.7-4.6 mg/dl; calcemia 8.4-10.2 mg/dl; in CKD-3: parathyroid hormone (PTH) 35-70 pg/ml; in CKD-4: PTH 70-110 pg/ml; 25(OH) vitamin D > 30 nmol/l).

(Failure to reach the BPT target will not cause exclusion as the centralized randomization will probably be the reason for the enrollment of patients who have the same clinical characteristics and the same treatments during the follow-up period).

Randomization will be centralized and patients will be randomized on the basis of sex, age, diabetes, levels of renal function (measured).

All patients will be provided with a nutritional and diet counseling consisting of a low protein, phosphorus and sodium diet.

Duration of the study:

3 years.

Primary endpoints

  • Doubling of Creatinine

    . Beginning of dialysis

  • All-cause mortality

Study Power

To determine the sample size was used EAST software version 3.1 and considered the following assumptions:

  1. alfa 0.05;
  2. power 0.90;
  3. treatment/untreatment 1;
  4. lost to follow-up 10 %;
  5. Two-tailed statistical test with type I error of 5%.
  6. Statistical power of the test equal to 80%.

Therefore, it was determined:

  • Number of events required 194.
  • Number of subjects needed 728
  • Study duration 36 months.

Parameters measured every 3-6 months:

Bicarbonate levels blood albumin levels, fetuin-A, C-reactive protein blood levels of sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, chloride, blood levels of homocysteine, lipid profile blood levels of calcium, phosphorus, PTH, alkaline phosphatase, bone turnover markers blood levels of creatinine, plasma urea, blood count 24h urinary urea excretion, 24h urinary sodium excretion, 24h urinary protein excretion, 24 urinary creatinine excretion bioelectrical impedance assessment (BIA), body weight, blood pressure, Lateral abdominal X-ray for vascular calcification.

Use of anti-hypertensive drugs and diuretics.

Administration of bicarbonates:

The molecular weight of sodium bicarbonate is 84.01. Each gram of substance therefore contains 11.9 mmol, so initially as much as 3-4 grams can be administered, subsequently it has to be adjusted according to the blood level of bicarbonate.

Evaluations should be made on a bimonthly basis in order to adjust the administration of bicarbonate according to blood levels of bicarbonate (target values >24 e <28 mEq/L).

Bicarbonate administration should be suspended if blood bicarbonate levels are > 28 mEq/L.

For ethical reasons, partial correction of acidosis is allowed (up to 22 mEq/L) for blood bicarbonate levels lower than 18 mEq/L.

The aim of the study is to demonstrate that the optimal correction of uremic acidosis (with administration of sodium bicarbonate or of any other alkalinizing agent, e.g. sodium citrate) reduces renal and cardiovascular mortality.

Prerequisites of the study:

a) to expose the patient to low risks of unfavourable events, c) patients will be asked for a little but constant effort with some modifications in their life style, d) costs should be low for the family and for the institution where the patient is treated. No specific equipment and competences are required, so that the study can be easily performed in any Nephrology Division.

------------------------- Ethical aspects The physician will describe the study in detail and will read all information regarding the study to the patient so that he/she will have the opportunity to ask for any further clarification.

Thereafter, the patients will be provided with the Informed Consent, which he/she should sign after reading it throughout (see attachments). Patient's data will be recorded, processed and stored in complete accordance with the data protection laws, in order to safeguard the safety and privacy of data; if included in publications and/or presented at conferences, data will undergo a statical process and will be kept anonymous.

Statistics Methods of descriptive and distribution statistics together with parametric and non-parametric tests will be applied. Linear correlation or the Spearman test will be used to analyse the relationship between two variables considered simultaneously; the relationship among more variables will be analysed with multiple regression (linear or logistic).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

728

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Avellino
      • Solofra, Avellino, Italy, I-83029
        • Not yet recruiting
        • UOC di Nefrologia
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Biagio Di Iorio, Direttore
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Giovambattista Capasso
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Filippo Aucella
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Adamasco Cupisti
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Domenico Santoro
      • Solofra, Avellino, Italy, I-83029
        • Recruiting
        • UOC do Nefrologia
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Giovambattista Capasso
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Filippo Aucella
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Adamasco Cupisti
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Domenico Santoro
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Biagio Di Iorio

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • End stage renal disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neoplastic diseases

    • Autoimmune diseases
    • Decompensation class III-IV
    • Uncontrollable hypertension
    • Amputation of the limbs
    • Previous ictus cerebri
    • Neobladder, ureterosigmoidostomy
    • Sever acidosis with bicarbonate < 18 mEq/l
    • Use of calcium carbonate (relative exclusion factor: patients who used to take this drug and suspended it before the beginning of the 3-month run-in period can be included in the study).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: no intervention
Experimental: Bicarbonate
bicarbonate administration
Other Names:
  • Alkali

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
doubling of creatinine
Time Frame: 36 months
the primary outcome will be reached when the seric creatinine level (mg/dl) will double compared to the basal value.
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
all-cause death
Time Frame: 36 month
all-cause death of patients
36 month
start of renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: 36 month
start of dialysis (peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis)
36 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Biagio Di Iorio, MD, PhD, Azienda Sanitaria ASL Avellino 2

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • aslav2

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metabolic Acidosis

Clinical Trials on Bicarbonate

Subscribe