To Compare Cemented Versus Screw-retained Implant-supported Single Crowns With Customized Zirconia Abutments

November 4, 2020 updated by: University of Zurich

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Cemented Versus Screw-retained Implant-supported Single Crowns With Customized Zirconia Abutments

The aim of this study is to test whether or not the use of screw-retained implant crowns on customized zirconia abutments results in biological, technical and esthetic outcomes similar to those obtained with cemented all-ceramic crowns on customized zirconia abutments, both made with a computer-aided design and manufacturing procedure (CAD/CAM).

The null-hypotheses is that marginal bone level change is equal at screw-retained and cemented crowns

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8032
        • Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Single-tooth Straumann Bone Level in the anterior maxilla or mandible
  • At least one adjacent natural tooth present
  • Implant position enabling both screw-retained and cemented crown
  • Informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoking more than 15 cigarettes a day
  • Poor oral hygiene (Plaque index over 30%)
  • Pregnancy at the date of inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cemented single crowns
Cemented single crown: zirconia abutment (Straumann Cares abutment) with an all-ceramic lithium disilicate crown

The final lithium disilicate crowns will be cemented with an adhesive cement after tightening the abutments with the torque indicated by the manufacturer and closing the screw access hole with white guttapercha. The abutment will be cleaned with ethanol. A retraction cord will be placed for cementation if indicated. The crown will be etched with hydrofluoric acid and subsequently silanized. A sufficient amount of cement will be filled in the crown without creating major excesses. When the crown is seated correctly, the cement will be light-cured for a few seconds to facilitate the removal of the now hard excess cement.

- Excess cement will be meticulously removed with a carbon scaler. The removal of all excess cement will be checked with an X-ray and by visual and tactile inspection.

Active Comparator: Screw-retained single crown
Screw-retained single crown: zirconia abutment (Straumann Cares abutment), directly veneered with veneering ceramic
The screw-retained crowns will be inserted and tightened with the torque indicated by the manufacturer. The screw access hole will to be closed with white guttapercha and a composite filling (Filtek, 3M ESPE).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Marginal bone level
Time Frame: 5 years
The bone level represents an indicator of the osseointegration and biological success of the implant.
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biological, technical and esthetic outcome
Time Frame: up to 5 years
Radiographic bone level after 1 and 3 years
up to 5 years
Biological, technical and esthetic outcome
Time Frame: up to 5 years
implant survival after 1, 3 and 5 years
up to 5 years
Biological, technical and esthetic outcome
Time Frame: up to 5 years
rate of biological complications after 1, 3 and 5 years
up to 5 years
Biological, technical and esthetic outcome
Time Frame: up to 5 years
rate of technical complications after 1, 3 and 5 years
up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 27, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 11, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012-0147

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Implant-supported Single Crowns

Clinical Trials on Cemented crowns

Subscribe