A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of MK-8457 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (MK-8457-010)

A Phase IIa, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter, Worldwide, Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of MK-8457 in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Anti-TNF-α Therapy

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of MK-8457 + Methotrexate (MTX) in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response or intolerance to anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF-α) therapy. The primary hypothesis of this study is that among participants with active RA, MK-8457 100 mg twice daily (BID) + MTX will be superior to placebo + MTX as measured by the change in Disease Activity Score 28 C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) after 12 weeks of treatment.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Rheumatoid Arthritis
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: MK-8457 100 mg; Drug: Methotrexate; Drug: Dose-match placebo

Detailed Description

In the Base Study, participants were to receive blinded MK-8457 100 mg + MTX or matched placebo + MTX for up to 24 weeks. At Week 12 and 18, efficacy evaluation was conducted to assess eligibility for early escape, defined as <20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts. Participants who completed the Base Study and those eligible for early escape could enroll in the 76-week Safety Extension in which participants were to receive open-label MK-8457 100 mg BID + MTX.

All participants must have been treated with MTX for at least 3 months prior to Screening and have been receiving a stable dose of MTX for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening. In addition, each participant must have either failed treatment with 1 or 2 anti-TNF-α therapies or was intolerant to anti-TNF-α therapy prior to Screening. For participants who failed therapy, the treatment with anti-TNF-α therapies must have been for at least 3 months.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 56
• Phase: Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis for at least 6 months prior to screening
• Active rheumatoid arthritis as defined by the presence of >= 6 swollen joints (of 66 count) and >= 6 tender joints (of 68 joint count)
• C-reactive protein blood level >0.9 mg/dL or an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >28 mm/hr and evidence of synovitis on imaging
• American College of Rheumatology Functional Class I, II, or III
• Received methotrexate for a minimum of 3 months prior to screening with a regionally appropriate stable weekly dose for at least 4 weeks prior to screening. The dose of methotrexate must remain stable through Week 24 of the study.
• Failed treatment with 1 or 2 anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) therapies or was intolerant to anti-TNF-α therapy prior to screening
• If using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or other analgesics, participant must be on a stable dose
• No history of either untreated latent or active tuberculosis (TB) prior to baseline
• Participants of reproductive potential must agree to remain abstinent or use 2 acceptable methods of birth control

Exclusion Criteria:

• Presence of inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis, including but not limited to psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
• Hospitalization due to an acute cardiovascular event, cardiovascular illness, or cardiovascular surgery within 6 months of screening
• Participant has a transplanted organ, excluding corneal transplant, performed > 3 months prior to the first dose of trial medication
• History of, or current ongoing ,chronic or recurrent infectious disease
• Positive hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C test result
• Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive
• User of recreational or illicit drugs or has had a history (within the previous 2 years) of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence
• Prior exposure to fostamatinib or other spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors
• Prior exposure to 3 or more anti-TNF therapeutic agents
• Has been treated for RA with a marketed biologic agent (other than anti-TNF therapeutic agents) and failed the agent due to lack of efficacy
• Currently participating in another interventional clinical trial or has participated in an interventional clinical trial within 4 weeks prior to screening
• Severe opportunistic infection within the 6 months prior to screening

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Base Study: MK-8457; Participants received MK-8457 100 mg dosed twice daily (BID) orally with MTX at the stable dose received upon study enrollment. The Base Study lasted up to 24 weeks.	Drug: MK-8457 100 mg; MK-8457 100 mg dosed orally BID; Drug: Methotrexate; MTX dosed at the stable dose received upon study entry; Other Names: Rheumatrex; Trexall
Placebo Comparator: Base Study: Placebo; Participants received placebo BID orally with MTX at the stable dose received upon study enrollment. The Base Study lasted up to 24 weeks.	Drug: Methotrexate; MTX dosed at the stable dose received upon study entry; Other Names: Rheumatrex; Trexall; Drug: Dose-match placebo; Dose-matched placebo dosed orally BID
Experimental: Safety Extension: MK-8457; Participants received MK-8457 100 mg dosed twice daily (BID) orally with MTX at the stable dose received upon study enrollment. The Safety Extension was to last up to 76 weeks.	Drug: MK-8457 100 mg; MK-8457 100 mg dosed orally BID; Drug: Methotrexate; MTX dosed at the stable dose received upon study entry; Other Names: Rheumatrex; Trexall

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) as Measured by C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12	The DAS28-CRP is a continuous parameter based upon a statistically-derived index combining tender joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; TEN28), swollen joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; SW28), CRP (an inflammatory marker, decrease indicates improvement), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor; GH). It is defined as follows: DAS28-CRP = 0.56 × SQRT(TEN28) + 0.28 × SQRT(SW28) + 0.36 × ln (CRP+1) + 0.014 × GH + 0.96. The DAS28-CRP is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater RA disease activity. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.	Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 12	ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.	Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability (HAQ Disability Index) at Week 12	The functional status of the participant was assessed using the Disability Index of the HAQ on a Likert scale. This 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. The overall score for the Disability Index is the mean of the 8 functional area scores and also ranges from 0 to 3, with a lower score indicating less disability. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.	Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Week 12	ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.	Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR20 Response at Week 24	ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.	Week 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 24	The DAS28-CRP is a continuous parameter based upon a statistically-derived index combining tender joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; TEN28), swollen joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; SW28), CRP (decrease indicates improvement), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor; GH, ). It is defined as follows: DAS28-CRP = 0.56 × SQRT(TEN28) + 0.28 × SQRT(SW28) + 0.36 × ln (CRP+1) + 0.014 × GH + 0.96. The DAS28-CRP is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater RA disease activity. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.	Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Week 24	ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0=Absent; 1=Present) and 2) ≥50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, 0=no pain to 100=extreme pain); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from 0=no difficulty to 24=inability to perform tasks; and e) CRP (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.	Week 24
Change From Baseline in the HAQ Disability Index at Week 24	The functional status of the participant was assessed using the Disability Index of the HAQ on a Likert scale. This 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. The overall score for the Disability Index is the mean of the 8 functional area scores and also ranges from 0 to 3, with a lower score indicating less disability. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.	Baseline and Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): August 29, 2012
• Primary Completion (Actual): October 8, 2013
• Study Completion (Actual): October 8, 2013

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 25, 2012
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 25, 2012
• First Posted (Estimate): July 27, 2012

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 30, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 13, 2021
• Last Verified: July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Immune System Diseases; Autoimmune Diseases; Joint Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Rheumatic Diseases; Connective Tissue Diseases; Arthritis; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors; Enzyme Inhibitors; Antirheumatic Agents; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antimetabolites; Antineoplastic Agents; Immunosuppressive Agents; Immunologic Factors; Dermatologic Agents; Reproductive Control Agents; Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortifacient Agents; Folic Acid Antagonists; Methotrexate
• Other Study ID Numbers: 8457-010; 2012-002181-12 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf