Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Recreational Activity for Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)

October 19, 2020 updated by: Susanne Bejerot, Karolinska Institutet

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Recreational Activity for Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorders. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The purpose of this study is to determine if adults with autism spectrum disorder and with normal intelligence improve from 36 sessions (1 calendar year) of group treatment with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy or recreational activity in groups with 6-8 participants.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study was to compare two group interventions for psychiatric patients with Autism spectrum disorder and normal intelligence: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy developed to suit adults with Autism spectrum disorder, and recreational activity, enabling social interaction. The recreational activity intervention served as a low-impact option, easily organised within the community. It is not a placebo; rather it controls for the positive effects that come out of a structured social environment and group setting. The investigators hypothesized that both interventions would lead to improvement in quality of life, well-being and relief in psychiatric symptoms, with a greater effect in the Cognitive Behavioural Therapy intervention compared to recreational activity. A cumulative follow-up was made, within 5 1/2 years after the start of the treatments. Additional questions adapted to the patient group were added at this 5 1/2 year time point.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, SE-11281
        • Northern Stockholm psychiatry, St. Göran hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders
  • Normal intelligence as assumed by mainstream schooling
  • Acceptance of a group setting
  • Being able to transport themselves to the clinic (with or without support)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current substance abuse
  • Current psychosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive behaviour therapy
36 weekly sessions (1 calendar year) of Cognitive behaviour therapy in a group setting.

The CBT intervention consisted of five elements: (a) structure, (b) group setting, (c) psycho-education, (d) social training and (e) CBT.

The participants were presented with the session plan for the whole year and given a binder in which they kept all materials. In addition, each session followed a strict agenda: (1) introduction and presentation of the agenda of the day, (2) resume of homework assignments from the previous session, (3) psycho-educative lecture and discussions on the session topic, (4) coffee break with buns or sandwiches, and social interaction, (5) relaxation or mindfulness exercise, (6) discussions and exercises on the session topic, (7) distribution of homework and (8) evaluation and end of session.

Active Comparator: Recreational activity intervention
36 sessions (1 calendar year) of a group intervention to enable social interaction and to break social isolation.
The therapists did not provide any deliberate interventions, such as psychoeducation, social training or CBT. Instead, the intervention relied on structure and group setting only. During the first session the participants were asked to write down group activities they would like to engage in. The therapists created a list of the suggested activities, such as visiting museums, board game playing, cooking, restaurant visits, boating, cinema and taking walks. The participants voted for the activity of the next session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI, Frisch et al. 1992)
Time Frame: Baseline, after 36 sessions (1 calendar year) and at a cumulative follow-up within 5 years after treatment termination
Changes in the Quality of Life Inventory from baseline.
Baseline, after 36 sessions (1 calendar year) and at a cumulative follow-up within 5 years after treatment termination
Sense of Coherence (SoC, Antonovsky 1993)
Time Frame: At baseline and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
Self-rating scale, change from baseline
At baseline and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
The ten-item Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (RSES, Rosenberg 1962)
Time Frame: Before treatment (baseline) and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
This was used to measure self esteem, change from baseline.
Before treatment (baseline) and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
The patient versions of the Clinical Global Impression scale - Severity (patient CGI-S)
Time Frame: Before treatment and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
Severity of impairment at baseline rated by the patient. Change from baseline.
Before treatment and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (patient CGI-I)
Time Frame: Before treatment (at baseline) and at a cumulative follow-up within 5 years after treatment termination
Patient rating on a seven-step Likert scale
Before treatment (at baseline) and at a cumulative follow-up within 5 years after treatment termination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Autism Quotient (AQ, Baron-Cohen et al. 2001)
Time Frame: At baseline and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
A 50-item screening instrument for measuring autistic traits. Change from baseline.
At baseline and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS, Kessler et al. 2005)
Time Frame: At baseline and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
This is for self rating scale for measuring inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity.
At baseline and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI, Beck et al. 1996)
Time Frame: At baseline and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
This is a 20-item questionnaire to assess depression.
At baseline and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90, Derogatis & Cleary 1977)
Time Frame: At baseline and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
This is a 90-item self rating questionnaire assessing the presence and severity of various psychiatric symptoms
At baseline and after 36 sessions (1 calendar year)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Drop-out
Time Frame: After 36 sessions (1 calendar year)
How many sessions that each patient attended of the 36 sessions.
After 36 sessions (1 calendar year)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susanne Bejerot, MD, PhD, Karolinska Institutet

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 1, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autistic Disorder

Clinical Trials on Cognitive behaviour therapy

3
Subscribe