Thermal Stimulation for Stroke Patients (TSSP)

January 25, 2022 updated by: Jia-Ching Chen, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital

Facilitation of Sensory and Motor Recovery by Means of Heat and Cold-water Stimulation on the Paretic Upper Limb of After Stroke: One Year Follow up

Sensory and/or motor deficits in upper limb following stroke often have negative impacts on their daily living. Thermal stimulation with hot and cold pack alternatively incorporated into conventional rehabilitation has been reported and proved to be effective for upper limb functional recovery after stroke. However, whether hot- and cold-water stimulation alternatively based on thermal stimulation also has the effect still remains unknown. The aim of present study is to investigate the facilitated effect of hot and cold water stimulation alternatively on upper limb after stroke.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stroke patients from department of rehabilitation in Tzu Chi general hospital will be recruited and randomized into two groups, one for experimental group and the other for control group. In addition to receiving routine standard rehabilitation for both groups, the experimental group will receive additional hot- and cold-water stimulation alternatively for five times one session, consecutive four sessions a set, one set for 30 minutes a day and five sets a week for six weeks. The control group will be given ergometer exercises with the similar duration as experimental group. Both groups will be evaluated at baseline before TS and every two weeks till six weeks after TS, then at 3, 6 and 12 months for follow-up. A variety of evaluations used in the present study include Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions; Brunnstrom's stage, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale and Motricity Index were used for upper limb motor control and strength; Box and block test for hand dexterity. The modified Motor Assessment Scale and Barthel Index are utilized for evaluating general motor functions and daily activity performance, respectively. The modified Ashworth scale is used for change of muscle tone of upper limb.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hualien City, Taiwan, 970
        • Tzu Chi Buddhist General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a first-time ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
  • no severe diabetes or peripheral vascular disease causing sensory deficits.
  • no cognition problem and follow directions indicated by therapist during experiment.
  • motor deficit of the upper limb under (including) Brunnstrom stage IV, either in the arm or hand.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a cardiac disease or orthopedic problem history,
  • medically unstable such as experienced unstable angina, uncontrolled hypertension according to the treating physician, psychological history before stroke.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: thermal stimulation
The experimental group receiving heat and cold-water stimulation, 30 minutes a session, five sessions a week for six weeks.
The heat and cold-water will be added to the thermal group for 30-40minutes a session daily,five sessions a week for six weeks.
Active Comparator: control group
The control group receiving the similar intensity of ergometer exercise as the experimental group.
The control group will be given ergometer exercises with the similar duration as experimental group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale for stroke upper limb recovery
Time Frame: one year
The investigators will use the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale as the primary outcome measures in this study evaluating at baseline before TS and six weeks after TS, then at 3, 6 and 12 months for follow-up.
one year
motricity index
Time Frame: one year
The investigators will use the motricity index as the primary outcome measures in this study evaluating at baseline before TS and six weeks after TS, then at 3, 6 and 12 months for follow-up.
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions
Time Frame: one year
The investigators selected the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions as our secondary outcome measures evaluating at baseline before TS and six weeks after TS, then at 3, 6 and 12 months for follow-up.
one year
the modified motor assessment scale
Time Frame: one year
The investigators used the modified motor assessment scale as the primary outcome measures in this study evaluating at baseline before TS and six weeks after TS, then at 3, 6 and 12 months for follow-up.
one year
Barthel index
Time Frame: one year
The investigators used the Barthel index as the primary outcome measures in this study evaluating at baseline before TS and six weeks after TS, then at 3, 6 and 12 months for follow-up.
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jia-Ching Chen, master, Tzu Chi Buddhist General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 7, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on thermal stimulation

3
Subscribe