Laparoscopic Nissen Versus Anterior Partial Fundoplication

April 9, 2014 updated by: Region Skane

Comparison of Laparoscopic Nissen Versus Anterior Partial Fundoplication ad Modum Watson, A Prospective Randomized Trial

The most widely used operative technique for gastroesophageal reflux is total fundoplication where the gastric fundus is sutured around the distal esophagus like a wrap. This operation effectively prevents gastroesophageal reflux but gives rise to postoperative symptoms related to over-competence of the gastroesophageal junction. 40% of the operated patients experience increased flatulence and 20% dysphagia. Anterior fundoplication is an alternative technique where the distal esophagus is anchored to the crura of the hiatus esophagi and only a part of the front wall of the esophagus is covered with fundus. An anterior fundoplication is un attempt to create a more physiologic reflux control and less functional problems postoperatively. The aim with this study is to compare the results postoperatively, both short time and long time results.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim: To establish if there is a difference in the incidence of postoperative flatulence after the two different operative techniques. The secondary aims are to establish differences in relapse of reflux, incidence of postoperative dysphagia, dyspepsia, quality of life, hospital stay, sick-leave and complications.

Method: All patients operated on for reflux disease in Lund, Malmö,Trollättan and Kalmar are randomised between the two operations. Postoperatively, telephone interview is performed weekly the first two months. One year and ten years postoperatively. The patients are investigated with endoscopy, esophageal manometry, 24 hour pH-monitoring and symptom evaluation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kalmar, Sweden
        • Department of Surgery
      • Lund, Sweden
        • Department of Surgery
      • Malmö, Sweden
        • Department of Surgery
      • Trollhättan, Sweden
        • Department of Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age:18-65 years.
  • Good results of PPI treatment (<3 months) resulting in reduced heart burn and acid regurgitations.
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease as evidence by gastroscopy and pH-monitoring.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgery on the stomach
  • Patients with IBS (criteria ROM II)
  • Severe disease, for example diabetes mellitus, cardiopulmonary disease or renal disease, that would influence outcome measurement
  • Patients with active ulcer disease
  • Paraesophageal hernia
  • Patient that are incapable to understand the study information (for example mentally disorder, drug abuse)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Total fundoplication
Procedure: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication
Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication
Active Comparator: Anterior partial fundoplication
Procedure: Laparoscopic anterior partial fundoplication
Laparoscopic anterior fundoplication

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative flatulence?
Time Frame: Postoperative one year
To establish if there is a difference in the incidence of postoperative flatulence after the two different operative techniques.
Postoperative one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relapse? Complications? Functional problems?
Time Frame: Postoperatively three months, one year and ten years
To establish differences in relapse of reflux, incidence of postoperative dysphagia, dyspepsia, quality of life, hospital stay, sick-leave and complications.
Postoperatively three months, one year and ten years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pauline Djerf, Md, Region Skane

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 21, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastroesophageal Reflux

Clinical Trials on Nissen fundoplication

Subscribe