A Non-Interventional Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

September 14, 2016 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Multi-national, Multi-center Non-interventional Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Tocilizumab

This multi-center observational study will evaluate the use and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Eligible patients initiated on RoActemra/Actemra treatment according to the licensed label will be followed for 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Balikpapan, Indonesia, 76121
      • Bandung, Indonesia, 40161
      • Central Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
      • Central Java, Indonesia
      • Denpasar, Indonesia
      • Jakarta, Indonesia
      • Malang, Indonesia, 65111
      • Manado, Indonesia, 95115
      • Medan, Indonesia, 20157

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis initiating treatment with RoActemra/Actemra

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
  • Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis according to the revised (1987) ACR criteria
  • Patient in whom the treating physician has made the decision to commence RoActemra/Actemra treatment in accordance with the local label (DMARD-IR, TNF-IR or need of RoActemra/Actemra monotherapy); this can include patients who have received RoActemra/Actemra treatment within 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have received RoActemra/Actemra more than 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit
  • Patients who have previously received RoActemra/Actemra in a clinical trial or for compassionate use
  • Patients who have received treatment with an investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is longer) before starting treatment with RoActemra/Actemra
  • Patients with a history of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Rheumatoid Arthritis Participants
Participants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and the Disease Activity Score based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) who were on tocilizumab treatment within 8 weeks prior to start of study will receive tocilizumab in accordance with the licensed label recommendations, and will be observed for 6 months. The study is designed as non-interventional, no additional intervention in terms of follow-up visit, complementary examination or medication is required.
Tocilizumab in accordance with the licensed label recommendation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Remained on Tocilizumab Treatment at 6 Months After Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With RA Diagnosis
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 5
Percentage of participants was reported based on the timing RA was diagnosed. Timings included more than 5 years, less than 5 years. Participants with unknown timing were reported under "unknown".
Baseline up to Day 5
Percentage of Participants With Different Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 5
BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared and measured as kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2). BMI from 16 to 18.5 = underweight, BMI from 18.5 to 25= normal weight, BMI from 25 to 30= overweight, BMI from 30 to 40 = obese.
Baseline up to Day 5
Percentage of Participants With Rheumatoid Factor Status
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 5
Percentage of participants with rheumatoid factor status was reported as "positive" or "negative".
Baseline up to Day 5
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Citrullinated Cyclic Peptide (Anti-CCP) Status
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 5
Percentage of participants with anti-CCP status were reported as "positive", negative" and "unknown".
Baseline up to Day 5
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2.6 Units in DAS28 From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participants' disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], participant's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity [visual analog scale (VAS): 0 millimeter (mm)=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014*PtGA of disease activity. A total possible score of 0 to approximately 10, with higher score indicating worse disease activity. A reduction of at least 2.6 units from Baseline in DAS28 was considered as significant clinical improvement.
Baseline, Month 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Number of Participants Achieving a Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Criteria
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
Response was determined using EULAR criteria based upon DAS28 absolute scores at the assessment visit and the DAS28 improvement from Baseline. Participants with a score less than or equal to (≤) 3.2 and DAS28 improvement of greater than (>) 1.2 points were assessed as having a 'good' response. Participants with a score ≤3.2 and DAS28 improvement of >0.6 to ≤1.2 points, score of >3.2 and ≤5.1 with DAS28 improvement of >0.6 to ≤1.2 points, score of >3.2 and ≤5.1 with DAS28 improvement of >1.2 points, score of >5.1 and DAS28 improvement of >1.2 points were assessed as having a 'moderate' response. Participants with a score ≤3.2 and DAS28 improvement of ≤ 0.6 points, score of >3.2 and ≤5.1 with DAS28 improvement of ≤ 0.6 points, score of >5.1 and DAS28 improvement of >0.6 to ≤1.2 points, score of >5.1 and DAS28 improvement of ≤ 0.6 points were assessed as having a 'no' response.
Baseline up to Month 6
Number of Participants With Different Types of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
The SDAI was calculated as [SJC (28 joints) + TJC (28 joints) + VAS patient global assessment of disease activity + VAS physician global assessment of disease activity+CRP level(milligram/deciliter {mg/dL})]. VAS assessments: 0 centimeters (cm)=no disease activity to 10 cm=maximum disease activity'. Scores ranged from 0 to 86, with higher scores also indicating increased disease activity. SDAI score ≤ 3.3 is 'remission', score > 3.3 and ≤ 11 is 'low disease activity', score > 11 and ≤ 26 is 'moderate disease activity', score > 26 is 'high disease activity'. SDAI was reported as 'not available' for participants with no data on physical/patient global assessment of disease activity.
Baseline up to Month 6
Number of Participants With Different Types of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
The CDAI was calculated as [SJC (28 joints) + TJC (28 joints) + VAS patient global assessment of disease activity + VAS physician global assessment of disease activity]. VAS assessments: 0 cm =no disease activity to 100 cm=maximum disease activity'. CDAI scores ranged from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased disease activity. CDAI score ≤ 2.8 is 'remission', score > 2.8 and ≤ 10 is 'low disease activity', score > 10 and ≤ 22 is 'moderate disease activity', score > 22 is 'high disease activity'. CDAI was reported as 'not available' for participants with no data on physical/patient global assessment of disease activity.
Baseline up to Month 6
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR Criteria
Time Frame: Month 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
ACR20/50/70 percent (%) response is defined as a ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both TJC28 and SJC28, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS, left end of the line 0 cm=no pain to right end of the line 10 cm=unbearable pain; Patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; health assessment questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate].
Month 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Number of Participants With Reduction/Withdrawal of Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and/or Corticosteroids
Time Frame: Baseline, up to Month 6
Participants with reduction/withdrawal of DMARDs and corticosteroids at baseline (before trial period) and up to Month 6 (during trial period) were reported.
Baseline, up to Month 6
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6
Physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours was assessed using a VAS where left end of the line 0 mm=no disease activity to right end of the line 100 mm=maximum disease activity.
Baseline, Months 3, 6
Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Modifications
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
Baseline up to Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 21, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 24, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Tocilizumab

Subscribe