- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01673516
Effect of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Resistant Hypertension and Cardiovascular Hemodynamic in Comparison to Intensive Medical Therapy Utilizing Impedance Cardiography (OsloRDN)
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular disease, affecting approximately 1 billion1 people worldwide. Hypertension is a major public health concern, because of its complications (coronary artery disease, heart failure, renal disease, stroke). Early blood pressure control in hypertensive patients guarantees the best prevention of cardiovascular events on the long term (2007 ESH-ESC Guidelines on the Management of Hypertension; VALUE study). However, in spite of education efforts and antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure control rates remain low. The most common cause of uncontrolled BP is inadequate pharmacological treatment, because the selection of antihypertensive agents is often done independently of the hemodynamic status of the patient (volemic status, peripheral resistance, cardiac inotropy).
The sympatho-renal axis describes the dual role of the kidney as originator of some central nervous system afferent signals and recipient of efferent sympathetic signals. Both the contribution of the kidney to central sympathetic drive and the consequences of sympathetic efferent drive to the kidney contribute to the development and sustenance of hypertension. Poly-pharmacy strategies for the treatment of elevated blood pressure have identified populations of patients with treatment resistant hypertension.
Treatment Resistant Hypertension(TRH) is a blood pressure that remains above goal in spite of the concomitant use of antihypertensive medications from more than 3 drug classes. Patients who require more than 4 drug classes to have their blood pressure controlled are also considered to have resistant hypertension. Preferably, the regimen should include a diuretic and all doses should be optimal2 .The true prevalence of treatment resistant hypertension is unknown. In clinical trials from 20 to 40% of randomized patients did not reach blood pressure targets3. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in USA (2003-2008), non-pregnant adults with hypertension were classified as resistant if their blood pressure was 140/90 mmHg or higher and if they reported using antihypertensive medications from 3 different drug classes or drugs from 4 antihypertensive drug classes regardless of blood pressure. The prevalence was 12.8% of the drug-treated hypertensive population. Risk factors for treatment-resistant hypertension include older age and obesity .
Treatment-resistant patients are more likely to have albuminuria, reduced renal function, and a history of diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, stroke or heart failure. They are at increased risk of cardiovascular complications although the true incidence of death and morbidity remains currently unknown.
In the Spanish Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry5, 8295 of 68045 treated patients (12.2%) had treatment resistant hypertension, defined as an office blood pressure equal to or exceeding 140 mm Hg systolic and/or 90 mm Hg diastolic.
RDN is a novel procedure which has been approved safe and gives a remarkable reduction of BP in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients. The HOTMAN® System is a novel impedance cardiographic device, measuring and calculating hemodynamic parameters. The HOTMAN® System may help the physician to control blood pressure in patients with resistance hypertension.
* Our pilot study(Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension after witnessed intake of medication before qualifying ambulatory blood pressure.Fadl Elmula FE, Hoffmann P, Fossum E, Brekke M, Gjønnæss E, Hjørnholm U, Kjær VN, Rostrup M, Kjeldsen SE, Os I, Stenehjem AE, Høieggen A.Hypertension. 2013 Sep;62(3):526-32)has showed that The mean office and ambulatory BPs remained unchanged at 1, 3, and 6 months in the 6 patients, whereas there was no known change in antihypertensive medication. Two patients, however, had a fall in both office and ambulatory BPs. Our findings question whether BP falls in response to RDN in patients with true treatment-resistant hypertension.That is why we intended to do an intrim analysis after inclusion of around 30% of the total number planned to be included in the study.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Oslo, Norway, 0424
- Oslo University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Average SBP >140mmHg, measured per guidelines
- 24 hour average ABPM daytime SBP >135mm/Hg
- On stable medication regimen of full tolerated doses of 3 or more antihypertensive meds, with one being a diuretic
- No changes for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to screening
- No planned medication changes for 6 months
- Age 18-80 years
- At minimum, 3 antihypertensive medications must meet one or more of the following full dose criteria:
- Highest labeled dose according to medication's labeling
- Highest usual dose per clinical guidelines-JNC-7
- Highest tolerated dose
- Highest appropriate dose for the patient per the PI's clinical judgment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hemodynamically or anatomically significant renal artery abnormalities or stenosis >50% or prior renal artery intervention
- eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73m2 (MDRD formula)
- Albumin/creatinine ratio > 50 mg/mmol
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Known alcohol or drug abuse
- Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension in past year
- Stenotic valvular heart disease for which BP reduction would be hazardous
- MI, unstable angina, or CVA in the prior 6 months
- Known primary pulmonary HTN
- Known pheochromocytoma, Cushing's disease, coarctation of the aorta, hyperthyroidism or hyperparathyroidism
- Known primary hyperaldosteronism not adequately treated.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: group Co
group Co receives intensive medical therapy utilizing integrated hemodynamic management calculated by impedance cardiography of "The HOTMAN® System"
|
Impedance Cardiography by HOTMAN system will evaluates non-invasively hemodynamic parameters in patients randomized to "group Co"
|
|
Active Comparator: group RDN
For patients who will be randomly assigned to undergo renal denervation by "The SymplicityTM Renal Denervation System", the femoral artery will be accessed with the standard endovascular technique and the catheter will be advanced into the renal artery and connected to a radiofrequency generator.
As in Symplicity HTN 1 and 2 trials, four-to-six discrete, low-power radiofrequency ablations lasting up to 2 min each and of 8 watts or less to obtain up to four-six ablations separated both longitudinally and rotationally within each renal artery.
During ablation, the catheter system monitored tip temperature and impedance, altering radiofrequency energy delivery in response to a predetermined algorithm.
|
For patients who will be randomly assigned to undergo renal denervation (group RDN), the femoral artery will be accessed with the standard endovascular technique and the catheter will be advanced into the renal artery and connected to a radiofrequency generator.
As in Simplicity HTN 1 and 2 trials, four-to-six discrete, low-power radiofrequency ablations lasting up to 2 min each and of 8 watts or less to obtain up to four-six ablations separated both longitudinally and rotationally within each renal artery.
During ablation, the catheter system monitored tip temperature and impedance, altering radiofrequency energy delivery in response to a predetermined algorithm.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute change in office systolic blood pressure(SBP)
Time Frame: at 6 months
|
is the absolute change in office SBP, after a 6 months follow-up.
|
at 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Short and long term safety of RDN as an interventional procedure
Time Frame: up to10 years
|
Safety of RDN will be assessed at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years by clinical, laboratory and radiology examinations.
|
up to10 years
|
|
Percentage of normalization of blood pressure(BP) at office, home and ABPM
Time Frame: at 6 months and later
|
This will include the percentage of normalization of daytime SBP at office, home and ABPM.
|
at 6 months and later
|
|
The normalization of hemodynamics.
Time Frame: at 6 month and later
|
The normalization of hemodynamics: Cardiac Index (CI), Heart rate, Stroke systemic vascular resistance index (SSVRI), pulse wave velocity(PWV) and central BP.
|
at 6 month and later
|
|
Cost effectiveness
Time Frame: At 6 month and later
|
It will be assessed the Cost effectiveness of Renal denervation as treatment of resistant hypertension compared to control group.
|
At 6 month and later
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The quality of life and side effects related to antihypertensive agents
Time Frame: at 6 months and later
|
The quality of life and side effects related to antihypertensive agents
|
at 6 months and later
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Aud Høieggen, MD, PhD, Oslo University Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Halvorsen LV, Bergland OU, Soraas CL, Larstorp ACK, Hjornholm U, Kjaer VN, Kringen MK, Clasen PE, Haldsrud R, Kjeldsen SE, Rostrup M, Fadl Elmula FEM, Opdal MS, Hoieggen A. Nonadherence by Serum Drug Analyses in Resistant Hypertension: 7-Year Follow-Up of Patients Considered Adherent by Directly Observed Therapy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 20;11(18):e025879. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025879. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
- Undrum Bergland O, Larstorp ACK, Lund Soraas C, Hoieggen A, Rostrup M, Norheim Kjaer V, Godang K, Sevre K, Fadl Elmula FEM. Changes in sympathetic nervous system activity after renal denervation: results from the randomised Oslo RDN study. Blood Press. 2021 Jun;30(3):154-164. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2020.1868286. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
- Fadl Elmula FE, Hoffmann P, Larstorp AC, Fossum E, Brekke M, Kjeldsen SE, Gjonnaess E, Hjornholm U, Kjaer VN, Rostrup M, Os I, Stenehjem A, Hoieggen A. Adjusted drug treatment is superior to renal sympathetic denervation in patients with true treatment-resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2014 May;63(5):991-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03246. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
- Kjeldsen SE, Narkiewicz K, Oparil S, Hedner T. Blood pressure lowering effect of renal sympathetic denervation or placebo? - building expectations for Symplicity-HTN 3. Blood Press. 2013 Oct;22(5):279-81. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2013.840445. No abstract available.
- Fadl Elmula FE, Hoffmann P, Fossum E, Brekke M, Gjonnaess E, Hjornholm U, Kjaer VN, Rostrup M, Kjeldsen SE, Os I, Stenehjem AE, Hoieggen A. Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension after witnessed intake of medication before qualifying ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertension. 2013 Sep;62(3):526-32. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01452. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2012/145/REK
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy
-
University of FloridaNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); Emory UniversityRecruitingHypertension, Resistant to Conventional TherapyUnited States
-
Ceric SàrlNot yet recruitingMultivessel Coronary Artery Disease | Hypertension Resistant to Conventional Therapy
-
Memorial Health University Medical CenterUnknownHypertension, Resistant to Conventional TherapyUnited States
-
University of CambridgeBritish Heart FoundationUnknownHypertension, Resistant to Conventional TherapyUnited Kingdom
-
Mayo ClinicWithdrawnHypertension, Resistant to Conventional TherapyUnited States
-
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian...Completed
-
University of ZurichTerminatedHypertension, Resistant to Conventional TherapySwitzerland
-
Hannover Medical SchoolMayo Clinic; Charite University, Berlin, Germany; University of Bristol; Vanderbilt...CompletedHypertension, Resistant to Conventional TherapyGermany
-
Universidade Federal de GoiasUnknownHypertension, Resistant to Conventional TherapyBrazil
-
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai HospitalHuazhong University of Science and Technology; Shanghai Jiao Tong University...UnknownThe Diagnosis and Treatment of Resistant Hypertension, the Prevalence and the Prognosis (doublepres)Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional TherapyChina
Clinical Trials on The HOTMAN® System
-
Hemo Sapiens, Inc.CompletedHypertensionFrance, Estonia, Italy, Norway, Poland
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesUniversity Hospital, Lille; Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle; Kremlin-Bicetre... and other collaboratorsRecruitingProlapse; Female | Prolapse Uterovaginal | Prolapse; CervixFrance
-
Candela CorporationCompleted
-
Microbot Medical, INCCompletedPeripheral Vascular InterventionsUnited States
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNot yet recruitingHearing Loss, CochlearUnited States
-
Brazilian Institute of Robotic SurgeryHospital Mater Dei SalvadorRecruitingProstate Carcinoma | Prostate Neoplasm | Pain Intensity Assessment | Quality of Life (QOL)Brazil
-
Zhejiang Zylox Medical Device Co., Ltd.Not yet recruitingPeripheral Artery DiseaseChina
-
Acutus MedicalCompletedTypical Atrial FlutterBelgium, United Kingdom