Trial Comparing Metal Versus Plastic Stents for Preoperative Biliary Decompression

February 15, 2022 updated by: AdventHealth

Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Covered Metal and Plastic Stents for Preoperative Biliary Decompression in Pancreatic Cancer

Compare the performance of full covered metal stents and plastic stents for preoperative biliary decompression

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Covered self expandable metal stents (CSEMS) are three times larger in diameter than 10 Fr plastic stents. When compared to plastic stents, randomized trials have shown longer patency and fewer stent-related complications for CSEMS. The investigators hypothesize that placement of CSEMS would be a better treatment option for preoperative biliary decompression in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32814
        • Florida Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Patients with pancreatic cancer and mass in the head of pancreas causing jaundice.
  2. Patients 19 yrs of age and older
  3. Serum bilirubin > 2mg/dl
  4. CT: No evidence of distant metastasis or local vascular invasion (tumor surrounding portal or mesenteric vessels for more than 180 degrees of their circumference or an irregular vessel margin).

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Karnofsky score < 60
  2. Prior (ERCP or PTC) attempts at biliary decompression for the same indication
  3. Tumor-related gastric outlet obstruction (vomiting and oral intake of < 1L/day)
  4. Ongoing or planned neoadjuvant therapy
  5. Cholangitis at presentation or coagulopathy needing reversal medication
  6. Post-surgical anatomy
  7. Multiple extra-hepatic biliary strictures or concomitant stricture in liver hilum
  8. Failed ERCP's (Definition: Inability to deploy a biliary stent thereby requiring a PTC or surgery).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Metal stent
Patients randomized to one cohort will undergo placement of fully covered self expandable metal stents. The rates (%) of stent dysfunction and complications will be evaluated.
Rate of stent dysfunction (%) which includes persistent hyperbilirubinemia or cholangitis that warrant stent exchange by another ERCP.
Rates of procedural complications (%) such as pancreatitis, perforation or hemorrhage during stent placement will be assessed.
Active Comparator: Plastic Stent
At ERCP, a 10Fr plastic stent will be placed in the bile duct. The rates (%) of stent dysfunction and complications will be evaluated.
Rate of stent dysfunction (%) which includes persistent hyperbilirubinemia or cholangitis that warrant stent exchange by another ERCP.
Rates of procedural complications (%) such as pancreatitis, perforation or hemorrhage during stent placement will be assessed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications related to stent dysfunction
Time Frame: 30 days
Evaluate the rates of complications (%) related to stent dysfunction which include persistent hyperbilirubinemia and cholangitis that warrant stent exchange by a repeat ERCP.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural complications
Time Frame: 30 days
This will be measured as proportion of patients who encounter a procedural complication (%) during ERCP that includes pancreatitis, perforation or hemorrhage.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 22, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 21, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 21, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

A manuscript will be developed following completion of the study.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on Stent Dysfunction

3
Subscribe