Effects of Right Ventricular Pacemaker Lead Position Assessed by MRI

September 7, 2012 updated by: Alfred A Kocher, MD, Medical University of Vienna

Effects of Different Right Ventricular Lead Positioning on Cardiac Contraction Measured by Cardiac MRI: a Pilot Trial

Chronic right ventricular apical pacing has been associated with negative hemodynamic effects. Clinical outcome of right ventricular pacing can be influenced by multiple factors. An important factor seems to be optimal lead positioning. Data regarding left ventricular function impaired by lead positioning is insufficient. The aim of the present study therefore is to compare right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) with right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP). Outcome measurements are echocardiographic features, magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcome.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Department of Cardiac Surgery, MUV

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • patients with dysrhythmia requiring dual-chamber pacemaker implantation
  • planed MRI-pacemaker implantation (Accent MRI System,St. Jude Medical)
  • age between 18-90 years
  • no absolute pacemaker dependence
  • no present heart failure or any significant coronary heart disease (exclusion by anamnesis and echocardiography - LVH <15mm, LV EF>50%)
  • no previous myocardial infarction or significant coronary artery disease
  • life expectancy > 1 year
  • patients willing to participate in follow-up

Exclusion criteria:

  • Contraindications for MRI (Brain aneurysm clips, artificial heart valves, artificial joints, vascular stents)
  • Any contraindication for surgery
  • Absolute pacemaker dependence
  • Claustrophobia
  • GFR<30ml/min/1,73m2
  • Allergy to contrast agent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RVAP lead

Pacemaker lead implantation:

Pacemaker leads will be placed in specific predefined RA and RV sites according to randomization. In this arm pacemaker leads will be placed in the RV apex. The successful lead positioning at its target location will be verified by surface ECG and by fluoroscopy.

In this arm pacemaker leads will be placed in the RV apex.
Experimental: RVSP arm

Pacemaker lead implantation:

Pacemaker leads will be placed in specific predefined RA and RV sites according to randomization. In this arm pacemaker leads will be placed in the RV septum. The successful lead positioning at its target location will be verified by surface ECG and by fluoroscopy.

In this arm pacemaker leads will be placed in the RV septum.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ejection Fraction
Time Frame: 6 month
As primary endpoint the difference of ventricular function in both groups will be taken. Therefore the Ejection Fraction is measured in cardiac MRI and Echocardiography. There may be a different development of contraction, whether the lead is placed in the ventricular apex or the ventricular septum.
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alfred Kocher, MD, Department of Cardiac Surgery

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 10, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EC 023/2012

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Late Complication From Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation

Subscribe