A Multimodal Strategy to Screen for and Rule-Out Delayed High-Grade Conduction Disturbances After TAVR (LATETAVI)

May 19, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Electrocardiogram (ECG)-based algorithms have been proposed to guide post-TAVI conduction management; however, their ability to predict clinically relevant delayed conduction disturbances remains limited. The research team hypothesized that a rationalized strategy combining ECG findings with simple pre-procedural computed tomography (CT), derived criteria and implantation depth of the device, could improve risk stratification, reduce unnecessary pacemaker implantation (PPI) and preserve patient safety.

The investigator conducted a retrospective, multicenter study including 209 consecutive participants who underwent TAVR between February 2023 and September 2024 who were free from permanent pacemaker implantation at discharge. The investigator evaluated the performance of an ECG-based risk stratification algorithm previously described associated with pre-procedural CT parameters, including (membranous septum length, extent of valvular and subvalvular calcifications) and implantation depth. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe delayed conduction disturbances (including high-grade or complete atrioventricular block, severe or symptomatic bradycardia requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPI)) occurring at 3 months in patients according to the presence or absence of risk criteria defined by the algorithm. Secondary endpoints included the algorithm's positive and negative predictive values, assessment of non-syncopal conduction disorders, impact on post-procedural intensive care admission, timing of delayed conduction disturbances, delayed elective pacemaker indications, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and cardiac-related rehospitalizations.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

209

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34090
        • Faculté de médecine montpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consisted of 209 consecutive patients underwent TAVR using contemporary transcatheter valve prostheses and were managed according to a standardized ECG-based post-procedural conduction monitoring algorithm.

Only patients without pre-existing permanent pacemaker implantation and without immediate post-procedural indication for permanent pacing were included in the analysis. This population represents a clinically relevant group in whom post-discharge conduction risk stratification is particularly challenging and in whom optimization of monitoring strategies is most impactful.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient aged over 18 years
  • underwent TAVI, regardless of the access route and valve type
  • discharged from the hospital without a pacemaker

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a pre-existing pacemaker prior to TAVI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Participants discharged after TAVI without permanent pacemaker
Participants discharged after TAVI without permanent pacemaker, not meeting any algorithm-defined risk criteria. ECG at baseline/post-procedure shows no qualifying conduction abnormality, and pre-procedural CT shows no high-risk anatomic features (e.g., membranous septum ≥ 6 mm and no high-risk valvular/LVOT ( left ventricular outflow tract) calcifications). Procedural characteristics (e.g., implantation depth) are not in the high-risk range. Follow-up according to standard of care at ~1 and ~3 months.

Data collected from the medical records of patients followed in the participating centers

Pre- and post-TAVI conduction disturbances that did not warrant in-hospital permanent pacemaker implantation, including:

age, sex, key care dates (procedure, discharge, follow-up visits). Cardiac CT anatomy: membranous septum length; location/extent of valvular and LVOT calcifications Procedural details: annular perimeter/area; device implantation depth; device oversizing vs annulus.

Clinical course & outcomes: non-syncopal conduction disturbances; ICU stay (need and impact); timing of delayed conduction disturbances; delayed/elective PPI indications (e.g., persistent left bundle branch block (LBBB) with heart failure); mortality (all-cause and cardiovascular); cardiac rehospitalizations; survival status at follow-up.

12-lead ECGs, cardiac CT, medical reports, medical history.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of severe delayed conduction disturbances occurring at 3 months in patients according to the presence or absence of risk criteria
Time Frame: From hospital discharge (index TAVI) to 3 months post-procedure between February 2023 and September 2024
Percentage of participants discharged without a permanent pacemaker who develop a severe delayed conduction disturbance within 3 months, defined as high-grade AV (atrioventricular) block or severe/symptomatic bradyarrhythmia (e.g., sinus node dysfunction or atrial fibrillation (AF) with ventricular rate <40 bpm) requiring therapeutic intervention (medication change, unplanned hospitalization, temporary or permanent pacemaker). Events are ascertained from ECGs/clinical assessments/records at routine ~1- and ~3-month follow-up and reported overall and stratified by the protocol-defined risk algorithm (ECG, cardiac CT anatomy-including membranous septum length and valvular/LVOT calcifications-and implantation depth).
From hospital discharge (index TAVI) to 3 months post-procedure between February 2023 and September 2024

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 23, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Left Bundle-Branch Block

Clinical Trials on retrospective health data collection

Subscribe