Lenalidomide, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone (RAD) Versus Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (VRD) for Induction in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Followed by Response-adapted Consolidation and Lenalidomide Maintenance

April 26, 2023 updated by: Wuerzburg University Hospital

Lenalidomide, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone (RAD) Versus Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (VRD) for Induction in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Followed by Response-adapted Consolidation and Lenalidomide Maintenance - A Randomized Multicenter Phase III Trial by Deutsche Studiengruppe Multiples Myelom (DSMM XIV

The investigators propose this study utilizing Lenalidomide, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone (RAD) as comparator arm for Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (VRD) with the latter being considered a novel "standard" as an induction protocol, since response in general occurs early after starting treatment we decided to choose three cycles of either induction regimen.

Together with the "novel compounds", tandem high-dose melphalan is still the standard of care; it seems desirable to re-address the question of the number of transplant (single vs. double high-dose melphalan) procedures required in the context of triplet-induction protocols utilizing at least one of the novel compounds.

Thus, the question to be asked in the current protocol is whether immediate lenalidomide maintenance (i.e. following one cycle of high-dose therapy) as an investigational agent will result in identical progression free survival (PFS) when compared to tandem high-dose melphalan with deferred maintenance therapy.

Despite induction with novel compounds, approximately 25 - 40% of patients will be in less than very good partial response. Very recently, achievement of less than VGPR was confirmed to negatively impact on both PFS as well as overall survival (OS). Therefore, allogeneic stem cell transplantation is considered the standard of care in patients with suboptimal response to a first autograft.

In the current protocol, the standard for favourable responders (tandem-autologous transplant) is combined with 3 years of lenalidomide maintenance. This approach will be investigated for patients with less than VGPR following a first autotransplant and compared to the current standard of intensification in poor responders (allogeneic transplantation).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

406

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Med. Klinik IV, Hämatologie u. Onkologie
      • Berg, Germany, 82335
        • Schön Klinik Starnberger See, Hämatologie und Onkologie
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Hämatologie, Onkologie u. Tumorimmunologie
      • Bremen, Germany, 28177
        • Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin I
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
      • Erlangen, Germany, 91054
        • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Medizinische Klinik 5
      • Flensburg, Germany, 24939
        • Malteser Krankenhaus St. Franziskus-Hospital, medizinische Klinik I
      • Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 60596
        • Klinikum der Johann Woflgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Mai
      • Frankfurt/Oder, Germany, 15236
        • Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder) GmbH Medizinische Klinik I
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79106
        • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Abteilung für Innere Medizin I
      • Greifswald, Germany, 17475
        • Universitätmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin C
      • Hamm, Germany, 59071
        • St. Marien-Hospital gem. GmbHKna
      • Homburg/Saar, Germany, 66421
        • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes Innere Medizin I
      • Jena, Germany, 07747
        • Klinikum der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Klinikum für Innrere Medizin II
      • Karlsruhe, Germany, 76133
        • Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe Medizinische Klinik III, Abt. Hämatologie u. Onkologie
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, II. Med. Poliklinik
      • Kiel, Germany, 24116
        • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II im städtischen Krankenhaus Kiel
      • Koblenz, Germany, 56068
        • Stiftungsklinikum Mittelrhein GmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin
      • Lübeck, Germany, 23538
        • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Medizinische Klinik I
      • Mannheim, Germany, 68167
        • Universitätsmedizin Mannheim medizinische Klinik III
      • München, Germany, 80804
        • Klinikum Schwabing
      • München, Germany, 81366
        • Klinikum der Universität München-Großhadern
      • München, Germany, 81675
        • III. Med. Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München
      • Münster, Germany, 48149
        • Universitätsklinikum Münster, Medizinische Klinik u. Poliklinik A
      • Nürnberg, Germany, 90419
        • Klinikum Nürnberg Nord, 5. Medizinische LKinik, Onkologie/Hämatologie
      • Oldenburg, Germany, 26133
        • Klinikum Oldenburg GmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin II
      • Regensburg, Germany, 93053
        • Uniklinikum Regensburg, Abteilung für Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie
      • Stuttgart, Germany, 70376
        • Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Abt. Hämatologie, Onkologie u. Palliativmedizin
      • Ulm, Germany, 89081
        • Universitätsklinikum Ulm,Klinik für Innere Medizin III
      • Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany, 78048
        • Schwarzwald-Baar Klinkum Villingen-Schwennigen GmbH
      • Wiesbaden, Germany, 65199
        • Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Klinik Innere Medizin III
      • Wuerzburg, Germany, 97080
        • Universitätsklinikum Wuerzburg, Medizinische Klinik II

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
  • Patients willing and able to undergo autologous and allogeneic transplantation
  • no previous systemic therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma (dexamethasone at a cumulative dose of 320 mg; plasmapheresis/dialysis without concomitant chemotherapy, local irradiation of bone lesions; and surgical intervention is accepted as pretreatment)
  • Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma according to common diagnostic criteria including presence of CRAB and measurable disease parameters
  • Cardiac ejection fraction (LVEF) of at least 50%
  • Corrected DLCO of at least 50% ; alternatively pO2 [art.] of at least 70mmHg
  • Karnofsky performance status of greater or equal to 50%
  • adequate bone marrow function
  • adequate serum chemistry values
  • Use of adequate contraception for female subjects with childbearing potential and male subjects
  • Bone marrow sample available for analysis of molecular cytogenetics
  • Able to administer low molecular-weight heparin as a prophylactic anticoagulation therapy for the first three months(applicable for subjects randomized to RAD) and able to administer ASS 100 mg/d (applicable for subjects randomized to VRD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk
  • History of myocardial infarction; NYHA Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias; concomitant pericarditis or peri-/myocarditis
  • Use of any other experimental drug or therapy within 28 days of baseline
  • Greater or equal to Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy on clinical examination within 14 days before enrollment
  • Known intolerance of boron
  • Hypersensitivity to acyclovir or similar anti-viral drug
  • Prior malignancy except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical, breast or prostate cancer
  • HIV positive, active hepatitis B, C or D viral infection, known CMV reactivation/active infection, EBV reactivation/active infection or treponema pallidum infection
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Non-secretory MM
  • Clinically relevant active infection or serious co-morbid medical conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: single stem cell transplant, 3-year lenalidomide maintenance
Arm A
Induction: two versus one novel drug maintenance: lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy
Experimental: tandem autologous transplant, lenalidomide maintenance
Arm B
Induction: two versus one novel drug maintenance: lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy
Active Comparator: allogeneic stem cell transplant, lenalidomide maintenance
Arm C
Induction: two versus one novel drug maintenance: lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy
Experimental: tandem autologous transplant
Arm D
Induction: two versus one novel drug maintenance: lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary efficacy endpoint for the induction phase is the rate of patients with CR at first restaging
Time Frame: within 8 days after end of last induction cycle ((Day 92(RAD); Day 71(VRD))
within 8 days after end of last induction cycle ((Day 92(RAD); Day 71(VRD))
In the consolidation phase the primary efficacy endpoint for comparison II (response <VGPR after first ASCT) is the PFS rate
Time Frame: 3 years after the first ASCT, calculated from day 1 of ASCT.
3 years after the first ASCT, calculated from day 1 of ASCT.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
ORR following 3 cycles of induction treatment (VRD vs RAD)
Time Frame: within 8 days after end of last induction cycle
within 8 days after end of last induction cycle
CR and ORR at the end of the whole treatment programme
Time Frame: at the end of the whole treatment programme (approx. 8 years)
at the end of the whole treatment programme (approx. 8 years)
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 8 years from study entry
8 years from study entry
Incidence, severity and relationship of SAEs
Time Frame: 30 days post last dosing of study drug
30 days post last dosing of study drug
Numbers of hospital stays and hospitalization days
Time Frame: within two years from second restaging
within two years from second restaging

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Stefan Knop, MD, Wuerzburg University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Hermann Einsele, MD, Wuerzburg University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 14, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Previously Untreated Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Lenalidomide, Bortezomib

3
Subscribe