Dynamic Locking Screws 5.0 vs. Standard Locking Screws in Fracture of Distal Femur Treated With Locked Plate Fixation

August 11, 2020 updated by: AO Innovation Translation Center

A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Pilot Study of Dynamic Locking Screws 5.0 vs. Standard Locking Screws in Fracture of Distal Femur Treated With Locked Plate Fixation

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of Dynamic Locking Screws (DLS) used to stabilize the shaft component of distal femur fractures in comparison to standard locking screws (SLS). The hypothesis is that DLS will lead to better functional outcomes (WOMAC score) due to increased and more symmetrical callus formation and fewer non-unions.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Wien, Austria
        • Wilhelminenspital
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Charité Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum
      • Homburg, Germany, 66421
        • Universitatsklinikum des Saarlandes
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • BGU Tübingen
      • Chur, Switzerland, 7000
        • Cantonal Hospital Chur
      • Luzern, Switzerland, 6000
        • Luzerner Kantonsspital
      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Universitatsspital Zurich
    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • UC Davis Medical Center
    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65212
        • University of Missouri Orthopaedics
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University Orthopedics
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
        • Harborview Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 120 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 21 years and older
  • Closed or open distal femur fracture (AO 33 A1-3, 33 C1-3) including distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty
  • Ability to walk independently prior to injury
  • Eligible for treatment with ORIF of the distal femur with a large fragment locking plate (LISS, LCP)
  • Willing and able to comply with post-operative protocol and return for follow-up.
  • Ability to understand the content of the patient information / informed consent form and participate in the clinical investigation
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Additional ipsi- or contralateral lower extremity fracture
  • Any kind of implant at the ipsilateral proximal femur
  • Pre-existing malunion or nonunion of the ipsilateral lower extremity
  • Segmental bone defect requiring bone grafting
  • More than 4 weeks between injury and surgery
  • Pathologic fracture due to a disease other than osteoporosis (eg, tumor, metastasis)
  • Polytrauma
  • Active malignancy
  • Any not medically managed severe systemic disease
  • Recent history of substance abuse (ie, recreational drugs, alcohol) that would preclude reliable assessment
  • Pregnancy or women planning to conceive within the study period
  • Prisoner
  • Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: DLS 5.0 (Dynamic Locking Screws)
ORIF with DLS 5.0 (Dynamic Locking Screws)
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the distal femur with a large fragment locking plate (LISS, LCP) and DLS 5.0
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: SLS (Standard locking screw)
ORIF with SLS (Standard locking screw)
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the distal femur with a large fragment locking plate (LISS, LCP)and SLS (Standard locking screw)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
To assess pain, stiffness, and physical function
12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed Up-and-go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: 12 weeks ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days
The TUG measures the time (in seconds) that it takes for an individual to rise from an armchair (chair seat height = 45 cm / 1.5 feet), walk 3 meters (= 10 feet) to a line drawn on the floor, turn around and return to the chair. The time is measured from a seated position (back against the backrest) with a stopwatch started on the command "ready - go" and stopped when the seated position is reached again.
12 weeks ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days
Quality of Life (EuroQol-5D)
Time Frame: Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
Assessment of passive ROM of the knee (flexion - extension)
6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
Full Weight-bearing Status
Time Frame: weekly measurement at home

Assessment of the timepoint when the patient :

  • can bear the whole body weight on the affected leg at single-leg-stance for 3 seconds
  • can walk without walking aid
  • has no intake of analgesics
  • has a pain level experienced at the fracture site during weight bearing over two consecutive measurements with a value of ≤ 3 as measured on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable
weekly measurement at home
WOMAC
Time Frame: Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
To assess pain, stiffness, and physical function
Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael J. Gardner, MD, Washington University School of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Sean E. Nork, MD, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Femur Fractures

Clinical Trials on DLS 5.0 (Dynamic locking screws)

3
Subscribe